Nabila Dien Jasmine, Mohammad Ghani, Pitaloka Yuniartiningtyas, Iis Dewi Ratih
{"title":"Effectiveness of Intratympanic Steroid Injection on Hearing Threshold Improvement in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Nabila Dien Jasmine, Mohammad Ghani, Pitaloka Yuniartiningtyas, Iis Dewi Ratih","doi":"10.7874/jao.2026.00248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an otological emergency requiring early intervention to prevent permanent hearing impairment. Although recent studies have reported the effectiveness of intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI), evidence supporting its consistency across different clinical contexts remains limited. To evaluate the effectiveness of ITSI in improving hearing threshold(s) in patients diagnosed with SSNHL, and to examine whether treatment outcomes differ according to baseline hearing loss severity, clinical phenotype, and therapeutic role.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A quantitative meta-analysis of 16 eligible studies was performed. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model, with treatment effects expressed as Hedges' g, and publication bias was assessed using Egger's regression test. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the severity of initial hearing loss, presence of clinical comorbidities, and therapeutic strategy (primary versus salvage therapy). Differences with p≤0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ITSI significantly improved hearing thresholds, with a large pooled effect size (Hedges' g=-1.05; p<0.05). Egger's test indicated no significant publication bias (p=0.07). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in treatment effectiveness between moderate-to-severe and severe baseline hearing loss (p=0.20), or among the various clinical phenotypes (p=0.63). However, ITSI demonstrated greater effectiveness when used as primary therapy (Hedges' g= -1.24) compared with salvage therapy (Hedges' g=-0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ITSI was an effective intervention to improve hearing thresholds in patients with SSNHL. Treatment outcomes were not significantly influenced by baseline hearing loss severity or clinical phenotype, but were affected by the therapeutic role. Early use of ITSI as first-line therapy yielded the most optimal hearing recovery while remaining a valuable salvage option.</p>","PeriodicalId":44886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2026.00248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an otological emergency requiring early intervention to prevent permanent hearing impairment. Although recent studies have reported the effectiveness of intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI), evidence supporting its consistency across different clinical contexts remains limited. To evaluate the effectiveness of ITSI in improving hearing threshold(s) in patients diagnosed with SSNHL, and to examine whether treatment outcomes differ according to baseline hearing loss severity, clinical phenotype, and therapeutic role.
Materials and methods: A quantitative meta-analysis of 16 eligible studies was performed. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model, with treatment effects expressed as Hedges' g, and publication bias was assessed using Egger's regression test. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the severity of initial hearing loss, presence of clinical comorbidities, and therapeutic strategy (primary versus salvage therapy). Differences with p≤0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results: ITSI significantly improved hearing thresholds, with a large pooled effect size (Hedges' g=-1.05; p<0.05). Egger's test indicated no significant publication bias (p=0.07). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in treatment effectiveness between moderate-to-severe and severe baseline hearing loss (p=0.20), or among the various clinical phenotypes (p=0.63). However, ITSI demonstrated greater effectiveness when used as primary therapy (Hedges' g= -1.24) compared with salvage therapy (Hedges' g=-0.59).
Conclusions: ITSI was an effective intervention to improve hearing thresholds in patients with SSNHL. Treatment outcomes were not significantly influenced by baseline hearing loss severity or clinical phenotype, but were affected by the therapeutic role. Early use of ITSI as first-line therapy yielded the most optimal hearing recovery while remaining a valuable salvage option.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Audiology and Otology (JAO) (formerly known as Korean Journal of Audiology) aims to publish the most advanced findings for all aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear using state-of-the-art techniques and analyses. The journal covers recent trends related to the topics of audiology, otology, and neurotology conducted by professionals, with the goal of providing better possible treatment to people of all ages, from infants to the elderly, who suffer from auditory and/or vestibular disorders and thus, improving their quality of life. This journal encourages the submission of review papers about current professional issues, research papers presenting a scientific base and clinical application, and case papers with unique reports or clinical trials. We also invite letters to the editor and papers related to the manufacture and distribution of medical devices. This journal provides integrated views from otologists, audiologists, and other healthcare practitioners, offering readers high quality scientific and clinical information. This peer-reviewed and open access journal has been the official journal of the Korean Audiological Society since 1997 and of both the Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otological Society since 2017. It is published in English four times a year in January, April, July, and October.