Abigail M Tolentino, Yanqing Xu, Ming-Fo Hsu, Fawaz G Haj, Payam Vahmani
{"title":"Grass-Fed and Grain-Fed Beef Fats Similarly Improve Metabolic Outcomes Compared with Pork Fat in Diet-Induced Obese Mice.","authors":"Abigail M Tolentino, Yanqing Xu, Ming-Fo Hsu, Fawaz G Haj, Payam Vahmani","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2026.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although grass-fed and grain-fed production systems significantly affect the fatty acid composition of beef, evidence for distinct health outcomes remains limited despite widespread perceptions that grass-fed beef has health benefits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated whether chronic consumption of grass-fed versus grain-fed beef fat differentially affects metabolic outcomes compared with pork fat in a diet-induced obese mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty male C57BL/6J mice were fed a low-fat diet (LFD, 10% kcal fat) or a high-fat diet (HFD, 45% kcal fat) containing rendered pork fat (HFD-P), grain-fed beef fat (HFD-GN), or grass-fed beef fat (HFD-GS) for 16 weeks. Metabolic assessments included glucose and insulin tolerance tests, circulating biochemical and inflammatory markers, tissue fatty acid composition, and insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both beef fat groups similarly (P > 0.05) affected body weight, adiposity, glucose homeostasis, and insulin tolerance. Compared with HFD-P, both HFD-GS and HFD-GN reduced inguinal adiposity by ∼30% (P < 0.01) and improved glucose tolerance GTT AUC by ∼17% (P < 0.05), without differences in systemic insulin sensitivity as assessed by ITT, HOMA-IR, and insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation in adipose tissue (P > 0.05). Circulating inflammatory markers were lower with HFD-GS, with resistin concentrations ∼30% lower than HFD-GN and HFD-P and IL-6 concentrations ∼70% lower than HFD-P (P < 0.01). These responses coincided with distinct tissue fatty acid remodeling in HFD-GS mice, characterized by higher omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, trans vaccenic acid, and rumenic acid, and a lower omega-6/omega-3 ratio in blood and adipose compared with HFD-GN and HFD-P.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both beef fat sources similarly improved glucose tolerance and reduced adiposity compared with pork fat in HFD fed C57BL/6J mice. However, grass-fed beef fat may confer additional anti-inflammatory benefits associated with its distinct fatty acid composition.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry number and website where it was obtained: </strong>N/A REGISTRY AND REGISTRY NUMBER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OR META-ANALYSES: N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"101889"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2026.101889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although grass-fed and grain-fed production systems significantly affect the fatty acid composition of beef, evidence for distinct health outcomes remains limited despite widespread perceptions that grass-fed beef has health benefits.
Objective: We investigated whether chronic consumption of grass-fed versus grain-fed beef fat differentially affects metabolic outcomes compared with pork fat in a diet-induced obese mice.
Methods: Sixty male C57BL/6J mice were fed a low-fat diet (LFD, 10% kcal fat) or a high-fat diet (HFD, 45% kcal fat) containing rendered pork fat (HFD-P), grain-fed beef fat (HFD-GN), or grass-fed beef fat (HFD-GS) for 16 weeks. Metabolic assessments included glucose and insulin tolerance tests, circulating biochemical and inflammatory markers, tissue fatty acid composition, and insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results: Both beef fat groups similarly (P > 0.05) affected body weight, adiposity, glucose homeostasis, and insulin tolerance. Compared with HFD-P, both HFD-GS and HFD-GN reduced inguinal adiposity by ∼30% (P < 0.01) and improved glucose tolerance GTT AUC by ∼17% (P < 0.05), without differences in systemic insulin sensitivity as assessed by ITT, HOMA-IR, and insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation in adipose tissue (P > 0.05). Circulating inflammatory markers were lower with HFD-GS, with resistin concentrations ∼30% lower than HFD-GN and HFD-P and IL-6 concentrations ∼70% lower than HFD-P (P < 0.01). These responses coincided with distinct tissue fatty acid remodeling in HFD-GS mice, characterized by higher omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, trans vaccenic acid, and rumenic acid, and a lower omega-6/omega-3 ratio in blood and adipose compared with HFD-GN and HFD-P.
Conclusions: Both beef fat sources similarly improved glucose tolerance and reduced adiposity compared with pork fat in HFD fed C57BL/6J mice. However, grass-fed beef fat may confer additional anti-inflammatory benefits associated with its distinct fatty acid composition.
Clinical trial registry number and website where it was obtained: N/A REGISTRY AND REGISTRY NUMBER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OR META-ANALYSES: N/A.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.