Grass-Fed and Grain-Fed Beef Fats Similarly Improve Metabolic Outcomes Compared with Pork Fat in Diet-Induced Obese Mice.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Abigail M Tolentino, Yanqing Xu, Ming-Fo Hsu, Fawaz G Haj, Payam Vahmani
{"title":"Grass-Fed and Grain-Fed Beef Fats Similarly Improve Metabolic Outcomes Compared with Pork Fat in Diet-Induced Obese Mice.","authors":"Abigail M Tolentino, Yanqing Xu, Ming-Fo Hsu, Fawaz G Haj, Payam Vahmani","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2026.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although grass-fed and grain-fed production systems significantly affect the fatty acid composition of beef, evidence for distinct health outcomes remains limited despite widespread perceptions that grass-fed beef has health benefits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated whether chronic consumption of grass-fed versus grain-fed beef fat differentially affects metabolic outcomes compared with pork fat in a diet-induced obese mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty male C57BL/6J mice were fed a low-fat diet (LFD, 10% kcal fat) or a high-fat diet (HFD, 45% kcal fat) containing rendered pork fat (HFD-P), grain-fed beef fat (HFD-GN), or grass-fed beef fat (HFD-GS) for 16 weeks. Metabolic assessments included glucose and insulin tolerance tests, circulating biochemical and inflammatory markers, tissue fatty acid composition, and insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both beef fat groups similarly (P > 0.05) affected body weight, adiposity, glucose homeostasis, and insulin tolerance. Compared with HFD-P, both HFD-GS and HFD-GN reduced inguinal adiposity by ∼30% (P < 0.01) and improved glucose tolerance GTT AUC by ∼17% (P < 0.05), without differences in systemic insulin sensitivity as assessed by ITT, HOMA-IR, and insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation in adipose tissue (P > 0.05). Circulating inflammatory markers were lower with HFD-GS, with resistin concentrations ∼30% lower than HFD-GN and HFD-P and IL-6 concentrations ∼70% lower than HFD-P (P < 0.01). These responses coincided with distinct tissue fatty acid remodeling in HFD-GS mice, characterized by higher omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, trans vaccenic acid, and rumenic acid, and a lower omega-6/omega-3 ratio in blood and adipose compared with HFD-GN and HFD-P.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both beef fat sources similarly improved glucose tolerance and reduced adiposity compared with pork fat in HFD fed C57BL/6J mice. However, grass-fed beef fat may confer additional anti-inflammatory benefits associated with its distinct fatty acid composition.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry number and website where it was obtained: </strong>N/A REGISTRY AND REGISTRY NUMBER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OR META-ANALYSES: N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"101889"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2026.101889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although grass-fed and grain-fed production systems significantly affect the fatty acid composition of beef, evidence for distinct health outcomes remains limited despite widespread perceptions that grass-fed beef has health benefits.

Objective: We investigated whether chronic consumption of grass-fed versus grain-fed beef fat differentially affects metabolic outcomes compared with pork fat in a diet-induced obese mice.

Methods: Sixty male C57BL/6J mice were fed a low-fat diet (LFD, 10% kcal fat) or a high-fat diet (HFD, 45% kcal fat) containing rendered pork fat (HFD-P), grain-fed beef fat (HFD-GN), or grass-fed beef fat (HFD-GS) for 16 weeks. Metabolic assessments included glucose and insulin tolerance tests, circulating biochemical and inflammatory markers, tissue fatty acid composition, and insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: Both beef fat groups similarly (P > 0.05) affected body weight, adiposity, glucose homeostasis, and insulin tolerance. Compared with HFD-P, both HFD-GS and HFD-GN reduced inguinal adiposity by ∼30% (P < 0.01) and improved glucose tolerance GTT AUC by ∼17% (P < 0.05), without differences in systemic insulin sensitivity as assessed by ITT, HOMA-IR, and insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation in adipose tissue (P > 0.05). Circulating inflammatory markers were lower with HFD-GS, with resistin concentrations ∼30% lower than HFD-GN and HFD-P and IL-6 concentrations ∼70% lower than HFD-P (P < 0.01). These responses coincided with distinct tissue fatty acid remodeling in HFD-GS mice, characterized by higher omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, trans vaccenic acid, and rumenic acid, and a lower omega-6/omega-3 ratio in blood and adipose compared with HFD-GN and HFD-P.

Conclusions: Both beef fat sources similarly improved glucose tolerance and reduced adiposity compared with pork fat in HFD fed C57BL/6J mice. However, grass-fed beef fat may confer additional anti-inflammatory benefits associated with its distinct fatty acid composition.

Clinical trial registry number and website where it was obtained: N/A REGISTRY AND REGISTRY NUMBER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OR META-ANALYSES: N/A.

在饮食诱导的肥胖小鼠中,与猪肉脂肪相比,草饲和谷物饲的牛肉脂肪同样能改善代谢结果。
背景:尽管草饲和谷物饲生产系统显著影响牛肉的脂肪酸组成,但尽管普遍认为草饲牛肉有益健康,但关于不同健康结果的证据仍然有限。目的:我们研究在饮食诱导的肥胖小鼠中,与食用猪肉脂肪相比,长期食用草饲和谷物饲的牛肉脂肪对代谢结果的影响是否存在差异。方法:将60只雄性C57BL/6J小鼠分别饲喂含有猪脂肪(HFD, 10%千卡脂肪)、谷物饲牛脂肪(HFD- gn)或草饲牛脂肪(HFD- gs)的低脂饲粮(LFD, 10%千卡脂肪)或高脂饲粮(HFD, 45%千卡脂肪)16周。代谢评估包括葡萄糖和胰岛素耐量测试、循环生化和炎症标志物、组织脂肪酸组成和胰岛素刺激的Akt磷酸化。采用GraphPad Prism进行统计学分析,P < 0.05为显著性。结果:两组牛肉脂肪对体重、肥胖、葡萄糖稳态和胰岛素耐量的影响相似(P < 0.05)。与HFD-P相比,HFD-GS和HFD-GN将腹股沟脂肪减少了约30% (P < 0.01),将葡萄糖耐量GTT AUC提高了约17% (P < 0.05),而通过ITT、HOMA-IR和胰岛素刺激脂肪组织中Akt磷酸化评估的全身胰岛素敏感性没有差异(P < 0.05)。HFD-GS降低了循环炎症标志物,抵抗素浓度比HFD-GN和HFD-P低30%,IL-6浓度比HFD-P低70% (P < 0.01)。这些反应与HFD-GS小鼠明显的组织脂肪酸重塑相吻合,其特征是与HFD-GN和HFD-P相比,omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸、反式异戊酸和瘤胃酸含量较高,血液和脂肪中omega-6/omega-3比例较低。结论:与猪肉脂肪相比,两种牛肉脂肪来源同样改善了HFD喂养的C57BL/6J小鼠的葡萄糖耐量并降低了脂肪。然而,草饲牛肉脂肪可能具有额外的抗炎作用,这与它独特的脂肪酸组成有关。临床试验注册编号和获取网站:N/A系统评价或荟萃分析注册编号:N/A。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书