"TRACEBACK has probably saved my life": experiences of being notified about clinically significant cancer genetic information by the Australian TRACEBACK program.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Anishka Abeysinghe, Rachel Delahunty, Mary-Anne Young, Linh Nguyen, Paul A James, David Bowtell, Kathryn Alsop, Laura Forrest
{"title":"\"TRACEBACK has probably saved my life\": experiences of being notified about clinically significant cancer genetic information by the Australian TRACEBACK program.","authors":"Anishka Abeysinghe, Rachel Delahunty, Mary-Anne Young, Linh Nguyen, Paul A James, David Bowtell, Kathryn Alsop, Laura Forrest","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2026.102770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Australian TRACEBACK program retrospectively identified women with tubo-ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 who did not have genetic testing, most of whom were now deceased. Germline panel sequencing of 10 ovarian cancer-related genes was performed on tissue blocks or stored DNA. Probands or next of kin were notified of the sequencing outcome if a pathogenic variant was found. This exploratory study aimed to understand the experiences of probands and next of kin of receiving information from TRACEBACK, often unexpectedly.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven TRACEBACK participants were interviewed, and the qualitative data thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many participants described their initial shock and distress when they were notified unexpectedly about the germline information. However, these feelings were moderated by a sense of pragmatism as they gained understanding of their cancer risk management options. The majority valued TRACEBACK for enabling them to clarify their cancer risk through cascade testing, which provided opportunities for cancer prevention measures. Participants suggested germline results should be returned to biologically related relatives to minimise the risk of information not being communicated to at-risk relatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The benefits of unexpectedly receiving genetic information from TRACEBACK outweighed any potential harms, but consideration about to whom notification occurs is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"102770"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2026.102770","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Australian TRACEBACK program retrospectively identified women with tubo-ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 who did not have genetic testing, most of whom were now deceased. Germline panel sequencing of 10 ovarian cancer-related genes was performed on tissue blocks or stored DNA. Probands or next of kin were notified of the sequencing outcome if a pathogenic variant was found. This exploratory study aimed to understand the experiences of probands and next of kin of receiving information from TRACEBACK, often unexpectedly.

Method: Twenty-seven TRACEBACK participants were interviewed, and the qualitative data thematically analysed.

Results: Many participants described their initial shock and distress when they were notified unexpectedly about the germline information. However, these feelings were moderated by a sense of pragmatism as they gained understanding of their cancer risk management options. The majority valued TRACEBACK for enabling them to clarify their cancer risk through cascade testing, which provided opportunities for cancer prevention measures. Participants suggested germline results should be returned to biologically related relatives to minimise the risk of information not being communicated to at-risk relatives.

Conclusion: The benefits of unexpectedly receiving genetic information from TRACEBACK outweighed any potential harms, but consideration about to whom notification occurs is needed.

“TRACEBACK可能救了我的命”:澳大利亚TRACEBACK项目告知我有临床意义的癌症遗传信息的经历。
目的:澳大利亚TRACEBACK项目回顾性地确定了2000年至2016年间诊断为输卵管性卵巢癌的女性,这些女性没有进行基因检测,其中大多数已经去世。在组织块或储存的DNA上进行10个卵巢癌相关基因的种系面板测序。如果发现致病变异,则通知先证者或近亲测序结果。本探索性研究旨在了解先证者和近亲属从TRACEBACK接收信息的经历,通常是意外的。方法:对27名TRACEBACK参与者进行访谈,并对定性数据进行专题分析。结果:许多参与者描述了他们最初的震惊和痛苦,当他们意外地被告知生殖系信息。然而,当他们了解了自己的癌症风险管理选择后,这种感觉被一种实用主义感所缓和。大多数人认为TRACEBACK使他们能够通过级联测试明确自己的癌症风险,从而为癌症预防措施提供了机会。与会者建议,生殖系结果应返回给有生物学关系的亲属,以尽量减少信息不传达给有风险的亲属的风险。结论:意外地从TRACEBACK获得遗传信息的好处超过了任何潜在的危害,但需要考虑通知的对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书