Prevalence of Detrusor After-Contraction and Concomitant Urodynamic Findings: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Analysis of an Understudied Urodynamic Phenomenon.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alfredo Salazar Monroy, Jesús Héctor Cantú Elizondo, Arturo Pacheco Silva
{"title":"Prevalence of Detrusor After-Contraction and Concomitant Urodynamic Findings: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Analysis of an Understudied Urodynamic Phenomenon.","authors":"Alfredo Salazar Monroy, Jesús Héctor Cantú Elizondo, Arturo Pacheco Silva","doi":"10.5213/inj.2652222.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Detrusor after-contraction (DAC) is a urodynamic phenomenon whose clinical relevance remains contested, largely because no formal operational definition has been established. We conducted the first systematic review of DAC to characterize the definitional and methodological heterogeneity underlying its reported prevalence and its co-occurrence with other urodynamic findings. Exploratory quantitative pooling was performed to illustrate the magnitude of this heterogeneity, not to establish a clinically generalizable prevalence estimate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Scopus were searched from inception through February 2026 (PROSPERO: CRD420251131496). Studies reporting DAC prevalence with extractable numerator/denominator data in mostly adult (≥18 years), non-neurogenic populations were included. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models with logit transformation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Risk of bias was assessed using a checklist adapted from the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies (n = 7,131 patients) were included, applying at least four distinct operational definitions of DAC. Between-study heterogeneity was extreme (I² = 98.2%); an exploratory pooled DAC prevalence of 12.98% (95% CI 4.80-30.62%) is reported to illustrate this instability, with a 95% prediction interval (1.06-67.54%) spanning nearly the entire plausible range of proportions. Among DAC-positive patients, detrusor overactivity co-occurred in an exploratory pooled proportion of 48.57% (95% CI 25.50-72.26%; I² = 81.9%); in the absence of a DAC-negative comparator, this reflects co-occurrence rather than a demonstrated association. Pooled estimation of bladder outlet obstruction was not undertaken given incompatible definitional criteria across the only two studies providing extractable data (16.7% vs. 77.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The principal contribution of this review is the substantial definitional and methodological heterogeneity across studies of DAC, which precludes a clinically generalizable prevalence estimate. Detrusor overactivity co-occurs in approximately half of DAC-positive patients, an observation that warrants investigation with DAC-negative comparators before causal or associative interpretations can be drawn. Adoption of a uniform operational definition is necessary before meaningful comparisons across cohorts can be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":14466,"journal":{"name":"International Neurourology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Neurourology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2652222.111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Detrusor after-contraction (DAC) is a urodynamic phenomenon whose clinical relevance remains contested, largely because no formal operational definition has been established. We conducted the first systematic review of DAC to characterize the definitional and methodological heterogeneity underlying its reported prevalence and its co-occurrence with other urodynamic findings. Exploratory quantitative pooling was performed to illustrate the magnitude of this heterogeneity, not to establish a clinically generalizable prevalence estimate.

Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched from inception through February 2026 (PROSPERO: CRD420251131496). Studies reporting DAC prevalence with extractable numerator/denominator data in mostly adult (≥18 years), non-neurogenic populations were included. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models with logit transformation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Risk of bias was assessed using a checklist adapted from the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist.

Results: Five studies (n = 7,131 patients) were included, applying at least four distinct operational definitions of DAC. Between-study heterogeneity was extreme (I² = 98.2%); an exploratory pooled DAC prevalence of 12.98% (95% CI 4.80-30.62%) is reported to illustrate this instability, with a 95% prediction interval (1.06-67.54%) spanning nearly the entire plausible range of proportions. Among DAC-positive patients, detrusor overactivity co-occurred in an exploratory pooled proportion of 48.57% (95% CI 25.50-72.26%; I² = 81.9%); in the absence of a DAC-negative comparator, this reflects co-occurrence rather than a demonstrated association. Pooled estimation of bladder outlet obstruction was not undertaken given incompatible definitional criteria across the only two studies providing extractable data (16.7% vs. 77.8%).

Conclusions: The principal contribution of this review is the substantial definitional and methodological heterogeneity across studies of DAC, which precludes a clinically generalizable prevalence estimate. Detrusor overactivity co-occurs in approximately half of DAC-positive patients, an observation that warrants investigation with DAC-negative comparators before causal or associative interpretations can be drawn. Adoption of a uniform operational definition is necessary before meaningful comparisons across cohorts can be achieved.

尿逼肌收缩后的患病率和伴随的尿动力学结果:一项未充分研究的尿动力学现象的系统回顾和探索性分析。
目的:逼尿肌收缩后(DAC)是一种尿动力学现象,其临床意义仍有争议,主要是因为尚未建立正式的操作定义。我们对DAC进行了首次系统回顾,以确定其报告的患病率及其与其他尿动力学结果共同发生的定义和方法学异质性。探索性定量汇集是为了说明这种异质性的程度,而不是为了建立临床可推广的患病率估计。方法:检索PubMed和Scopus从成立到2026年2月(PROSPERO: CRD420251131496)。报告DAC患病率的研究包括大多数成人(≥18岁)、非神经源性人群中可提取的分子/分母数据。混合估计使用随机效应模型与logit变换和Hartung-Knapp平差进行计算。使用从JBI关键评估清单改编的清单评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入了5项研究(n = 7131例患者),应用了至少4种不同的DAC操作定义。研究间异质性极端(I²= 98.2%);据报道,12.98% (95% CI 4.80-30.62%)的探索性合并DAC患病率说明了这种不稳定性,95%的预测区间(1.06-67.54%)几乎跨越了整个合理的比例范围。在dac阳性患者中,逼尿肌过度活动合并发生率为48.57% (95% CI 25.50-72.26%; I²= 81.9%);在没有dac阴性比较国的情况下,这反映了共同发生,而不是证明存在关联。由于在仅有的两项研究中提供可提取数据的定义标准不一致(16.7%对77.8%),因此没有对膀胱出口梗阻进行汇总估计。结论:本综述的主要贡献是DAC研究的定义和方法学上的实质性异质性,这排除了临床推广的患病率估计。逼尿肌过度活动在大约一半的dac阳性患者中同时发生,这一观察结果值得与dac阴性比较者进行调查,然后才能得出因果或相关的解释。在进行有意义的队列比较之前,必须采用统一的业务定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Neurourology Journal
International Neurourology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
41
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Neurourology Journal (Int Neurourol J, INJ) is a quarterly international journal that publishes high-quality research papers that provide the most significant and promising achievements in the fields of clinical neurourology and fundamental science. Specifically, fundamental science includes the most influential research papers from all fields of science and technology, revolutionizing what physicians and researchers practicing the art of neurourology worldwide know. Thus, we welcome valuable basic research articles to introduce cutting-edge translational research of fundamental sciences to clinical neurourology. In the editorials, urologists will present their perspectives on these articles. The original mission statement of the INJ was published on October 12, 1997. INJ provides authors a fast review of their work and makes a decision in an average of three to four weeks of receiving submissions. If accepted, articles are posted online in fully citable form. Supplementary issues will be published interim to quarterlies, as necessary, to fully allow berth to accept and publish relevant articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书