Olivia M Zant, Chelsea Anderson, Addison Howell, Erin Schafer, Sharon Miller, Lauren Mathews
{"title":"Functional Listening Experiences of Autistic College Students: A Qualitative Study of Real-World Listening Demands.","authors":"Olivia M Zant, Chelsea Anderson, Addison Howell, Erin Schafer, Sharon Miller, Lauren Mathews","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Autistic individuals frequently report auditory processing differences, including difficulty perceiving speech in noise and heightened sound sensitivity. Although increased listening effort has been documented in autistic children, little is known about how autistic college students experience listening demands in higher education. This qualitative study explored the lived listening experiences of autistic college students across academic and everyday contexts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighteen autistic adults (ages 18-39 years) enrolled in or recently graduated from university programs participated in semistructured interviews via Zoom. Interviews explored listening experiences across classroom environments and everyday contexts. Reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework identified patterns and themes within the participant narratives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were generated through analysis: (1) affective cycle of listening, (2) strategic cognitive management of listening, (3) environmental contexts shape listening experiences, (4) social risk and stigma, and (5) inherent and developed listening strengths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Listening effort may represent an underrecognized barrier to educational participation for autistic college students. The present findings extend the existing frameworks of effortful listening by illustrating how cognitive, emotional, sensory, and social factors interact to shape listening experiences in real-world contexts. Importantly, these findings illustrate the value of incorporating lived experiences to better reflect the variability and subjective nature of listening, which traditional assessments may not fully reflect. For clinicians and educators, considering the contexts in which listening occurs alongside patient-reported experiences may support a more comprehensive understanding of listening-related demands and extend considerations beyond traditional auditory accommodations to improve education and communication participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Autistic individuals frequently report auditory processing differences, including difficulty perceiving speech in noise and heightened sound sensitivity. Although increased listening effort has been documented in autistic children, little is known about how autistic college students experience listening demands in higher education. This qualitative study explored the lived listening experiences of autistic college students across academic and everyday contexts.
Method: Eighteen autistic adults (ages 18-39 years) enrolled in or recently graduated from university programs participated in semistructured interviews via Zoom. Interviews explored listening experiences across classroom environments and everyday contexts. Reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework identified patterns and themes within the participant narratives.
Results: Five themes were generated through analysis: (1) affective cycle of listening, (2) strategic cognitive management of listening, (3) environmental contexts shape listening experiences, (4) social risk and stigma, and (5) inherent and developed listening strengths.
Conclusions: Listening effort may represent an underrecognized barrier to educational participation for autistic college students. The present findings extend the existing frameworks of effortful listening by illustrating how cognitive, emotional, sensory, and social factors interact to shape listening experiences in real-world contexts. Importantly, these findings illustrate the value of incorporating lived experiences to better reflect the variability and subjective nature of listening, which traditional assessments may not fully reflect. For clinicians and educators, considering the contexts in which listening occurs alongside patient-reported experiences may support a more comprehensive understanding of listening-related demands and extend considerations beyond traditional auditory accommodations to improve education and communication participation.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.