Corticospinal excitability scales with global arm cycling intensity but not instantaneous force.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
R L S Bilodeau, C Compton, D C Button, K E Power
{"title":"Corticospinal excitability scales with global arm cycling intensity but not instantaneous force.","authors":"R L S Bilodeau, C Compton, D C Button, K E Power","doi":"10.1007/s00421-026-06447-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Corticospinal excitability (CSE) is modulated during arm cycling, but its relationship with force production remains unclear. This study examined (1) how force output changes across arm cycling workloads and (2) whether CSE scales with force during rhythmic movement. Eleven healthy adults performed bilateral arm cycling at 25, 50, and 100 W at 60 rpm. Vector force was measured continuously across crank positions using instrumented handles. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation and cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited with transmastoid electrical stimulation were recorded from the biceps and triceps brachii at the 6 o'clock position to assess supraspinal and spinal excitability, respectively. Vector force increased with workload (p < 0.001) and peaked between 4 and 6 o'clock. MEP and CMEP amplitudes increased with workload in both the biceps (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and triceps (p = 0.003 and p = 0.041, respectively). Across pooled workloads, vector force was correlated with biceps MEP (r = 0.53, p = 0.002) and CMEP amplitudes (r = 0.37, p = 0.034), and with triceps MEP (r = 0.39, p = 0.031) and CMEP amplitudes (r = 0.50, p = 0.005). Within individual workloads, correlations between force and neural measures were consistently weak and non-significant for both muscles. These findings demonstrate that corticospinal excitability during arm cycling scales with overall workload but not with instantaneous force production, supporting the concept that descending neural drive primarily reflects task-level regulation rather than moment-to-moment force encoding during rhythmic movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06447-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corticospinal excitability (CSE) is modulated during arm cycling, but its relationship with force production remains unclear. This study examined (1) how force output changes across arm cycling workloads and (2) whether CSE scales with force during rhythmic movement. Eleven healthy adults performed bilateral arm cycling at 25, 50, and 100 W at 60 rpm. Vector force was measured continuously across crank positions using instrumented handles. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation and cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited with transmastoid electrical stimulation were recorded from the biceps and triceps brachii at the 6 o'clock position to assess supraspinal and spinal excitability, respectively. Vector force increased with workload (p < 0.001) and peaked between 4 and 6 o'clock. MEP and CMEP amplitudes increased with workload in both the biceps (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and triceps (p = 0.003 and p = 0.041, respectively). Across pooled workloads, vector force was correlated with biceps MEP (r = 0.53, p = 0.002) and CMEP amplitudes (r = 0.37, p = 0.034), and with triceps MEP (r = 0.39, p = 0.031) and CMEP amplitudes (r = 0.50, p = 0.005). Within individual workloads, correlations between force and neural measures were consistently weak and non-significant for both muscles. These findings demonstrate that corticospinal excitability during arm cycling scales with overall workload but not with instantaneous force production, supporting the concept that descending neural drive primarily reflects task-level regulation rather than moment-to-moment force encoding during rhythmic movement.

皮质脊髓兴奋性与整体手臂循环强度有关,而与瞬时力无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书