Exploring the risk of melanoma in people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Pub Date : 2026-10-10 DOI:10.1159/drm/ackag025
Upeksha Galappaththie, Amy Weber, Leanne Hall, Clare Heal
{"title":"Exploring the risk of melanoma in people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Upeksha Galappaththie, Amy Weber, Leanne Hall, Clare Heal","doi":"10.1159/drm/ackag025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The potential association between Parkinson's disease (PD) and melanoma has received increasing attention in the literature, yet its strength and direction remain incompletely understood. Previous studies vary considerably in diagnostic ascertainment, temporal relationship between the two conditions and analytic approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate this association while accounting for these methodological differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of four databases from inception to May 25, 2025 was conducted. Methodological study quality was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and JBI Analytical Cross-sectional checklist. GRADE was applied to assess the overall certainty of evidence. A random-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, of which three were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 2.55 (95% CI: 0.09-73.07). Although the point estimate was above the null, the confidence interval was extremely wide and included an OR of 1.0. Between-study heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 82.2%), and the certainty of evidence was rated as very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The available evidence regarding the association between PD and melanoma remains very uncertain. Although the pooled OR was above the null, the wide confidence interval, substantial heterogeneity and very low certainty of evidence prevent the drawing of firm conclusions regarding the magnitude or direction of this association. Current evidence is insufficient to support PD-specific melanoma screening recommendations, and further methodologically robust studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/drm/ackag025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The potential association between Parkinson's disease (PD) and melanoma has received increasing attention in the literature, yet its strength and direction remain incompletely understood. Previous studies vary considerably in diagnostic ascertainment, temporal relationship between the two conditions and analytic approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate this association while accounting for these methodological differences.

Methods: A comprehensive search of four databases from inception to May 25, 2025 was conducted. Methodological study quality was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and JBI Analytical Cross-sectional checklist. GRADE was applied to assess the overall certainty of evidence. A random-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2.

Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, of which three were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 2.55 (95% CI: 0.09-73.07). Although the point estimate was above the null, the confidence interval was extremely wide and included an OR of 1.0. Between-study heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 82.2%), and the certainty of evidence was rated as very low.

Conclusion: The available evidence regarding the association between PD and melanoma remains very uncertain. Although the pooled OR was above the null, the wide confidence interval, substantial heterogeneity and very low certainty of evidence prevent the drawing of firm conclusions regarding the magnitude or direction of this association. Current evidence is insufficient to support PD-specific melanoma screening recommendations, and further methodologically robust studies are warranted.

探索帕金森病患者患黑色素瘤的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书