Low-level light therapy for dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sjur Reppe, Yousif Subhi, Tore Steinkjer, Mazyar Yazdani, Miriam Kolko, Tor P Utheim, Fredrik Andreas Fineide
{"title":"Low-level light therapy for dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sjur Reppe, Yousif Subhi, Tore Steinkjer, Mazyar Yazdani, Miriam Kolko, Tor P Utheim, Fredrik Andreas Fineide","doi":"10.1111/aos.70252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A healthy tear film is vital for ocular surface integrity and relies on the coordinated function of the lacrimal glands, meibomian glands and conjunctival goblet cells. Dysfunction in any of these elements can lead to dry eye disease (DED). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of low-level light therapy (LLLT) as a standalone DED treatment. Although evidence for LLLT's therapeutic potential is growing, prior reviews have focused on short-term outcomes or combined LLLT with intense pulsed light. This meta-analysis consolidates current findings to clarify the clinical value of LLLT monotherapy in DED management. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies evaluating LLLT for DED. Study selection and data extraction were conducted according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed for Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) and tear meniscus height (TMH). Ten clinical studies were eligible for our systematic review, which included a total of 473 participants. Irradiation protocols included treatment sessions using wavelengths of 625-640 nm and/or 810-850 nm, with each session lasting a minimum of 10 min. In our meta-analyses, LLLT monotherapy was associated with significant improvements in OSDI (weighted mean difference [WMD] -11.42, p < 0.00001), NIBUT (WMD +1.49 s, p = 0.005), and TMH (WMD +0.04 mm, p = 0.007). Sensitivity analyses restricted to eligible RCTs confirmed significant effects on OSDI and NIBUT, but not on TMH. No adverse events were reported. LLLT appears to be well tolerated and may improve signs and symptoms of DED, particularly ocular discomfort. It may represent a promising standalone treatment option for patients in whom combination regimens involving IPL treatment are contraindicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.70252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A healthy tear film is vital for ocular surface integrity and relies on the coordinated function of the lacrimal glands, meibomian glands and conjunctival goblet cells. Dysfunction in any of these elements can lead to dry eye disease (DED). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of low-level light therapy (LLLT) as a standalone DED treatment. Although evidence for LLLT's therapeutic potential is growing, prior reviews have focused on short-term outcomes or combined LLLT with intense pulsed light. This meta-analysis consolidates current findings to clarify the clinical value of LLLT monotherapy in DED management. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies evaluating LLLT for DED. Study selection and data extraction were conducted according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed for Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) and tear meniscus height (TMH). Ten clinical studies were eligible for our systematic review, which included a total of 473 participants. Irradiation protocols included treatment sessions using wavelengths of 625-640 nm and/or 810-850 nm, with each session lasting a minimum of 10 min. In our meta-analyses, LLLT monotherapy was associated with significant improvements in OSDI (weighted mean difference [WMD] -11.42, p < 0.00001), NIBUT (WMD +1.49 s, p = 0.005), and TMH (WMD +0.04 mm, p = 0.007). Sensitivity analyses restricted to eligible RCTs confirmed significant effects on OSDI and NIBUT, but not on TMH. No adverse events were reported. LLLT appears to be well tolerated and may improve signs and symptoms of DED, particularly ocular discomfort. It may represent a promising standalone treatment option for patients in whom combination regimens involving IPL treatment are contraindicated.

低强度光治疗干眼病和睑板腺功能障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书