Semaglutide in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity: The Gap Between Discussion and Use.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-10-12 DOI:10.1159/crd/absag023
Ivana Jurin, Tomislav Jakljevic
{"title":"Semaglutide in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity: The Gap Between Discussion and Use.","authors":"Ivana Jurin, Tomislav Jakljevic","doi":"10.1159/crd/absag023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Semaglutide improves symptoms and physical function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and obesity. Whether discussion of treatment is accompanied by its use in routine care is less well understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed treatment discussion, follow-up medication records and documented reasons for non-initiation in 159 patients from a prospective registry. Available follow-up information was retained when assessment dates were incompletely transcribed. Associations with registry-recorded diabetes or prediabetes were explored using Firth logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Semaglutide was discussed or offered in 148/159 patients (93.1%). Among 148 baseline nonusers with subsequent medication information, it was newly recorded in 23 (15.5%). Recorded diabetes or prediabetes was associated with this outcome (adjusted odds ratio 3.76, 95% confidence interval 1.08-19.93), but a sensitivity analysis restricting the reference group by glycated haemoglobin was inconclusive. Among 125 patients without subsequently recorded semaglutide, affordability concerns were documented in 55 (44.0%), safety concerns in 48 (38.4%), and both in 38 (30.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frequent discussion of semaglutide coexisted with infrequent documentation of subsequent use. Financial and medication-related concerns commonly overlapped. These findings identify a gap in routine care without establishing its causal determinants or verifying treatment initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/crd/absag023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Semaglutide improves symptoms and physical function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and obesity. Whether discussion of treatment is accompanied by its use in routine care is less well understood.

Methods: We retrospectively assessed treatment discussion, follow-up medication records and documented reasons for non-initiation in 159 patients from a prospective registry. Available follow-up information was retained when assessment dates were incompletely transcribed. Associations with registry-recorded diabetes or prediabetes were explored using Firth logistic regression.

Results: Semaglutide was discussed or offered in 148/159 patients (93.1%). Among 148 baseline nonusers with subsequent medication information, it was newly recorded in 23 (15.5%). Recorded diabetes or prediabetes was associated with this outcome (adjusted odds ratio 3.76, 95% confidence interval 1.08-19.93), but a sensitivity analysis restricting the reference group by glycated haemoglobin was inconclusive. Among 125 patients without subsequently recorded semaglutide, affordability concerns were documented in 55 (44.0%), safety concerns in 48 (38.4%), and both in 38 (30.4%).

Conclusion: Frequent discussion of semaglutide coexisted with infrequent documentation of subsequent use. Financial and medication-related concerns commonly overlapped. These findings identify a gap in routine care without establishing its causal determinants or verifying treatment initiation.

西马鲁肽在保留射血分数和肥胖的心力衰竭中的应用:讨论和使用之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书