Education and training interventions for healthcare workers to prevent sexual harassment.

IF 11.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Therese K Dalsbø, Rakel Aasheim Greve, Ingrid L Jørgensen, Marita S Fønhus
{"title":"Education and training interventions for healthcare workers to prevent sexual harassment.","authors":"Therese K Dalsbø, Rakel Aasheim Greve, Ingrid L Jørgensen, Marita S Fønhus","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD016096.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Sexual harassment is common among healthcare workers and is associated with poor mental health, job dissatisfaction, and workforce attrition. Education and training may help prevent sexual harassment, but their effectiveness in healthcare settings has not been systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of education and training interventions on knowledge and skills for managing sexual harassment, and to assess their impact on the incidence of sexual harassment towards healthcare workers in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP, together with reference checking and contact with study authors, to identify eligible studies. The latest search date was March 2025.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving healthcare workers comparing education or training interventions with control (no intervention, waiting list, placebo, or minimal intervention) or different types of education or training to prevent sexual harassment in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Our critical outcomes were knowledge and skills in managing sexual harassment and the incidence of all types of sexual harassment perpetrated by patients, visitors, coworkers, and management. Important outcomes were anxiety, depression, burnout, sick leave, staff turnover, disability, and perception of the organisational climate related to harassment.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool to assess risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>We synthesised results for each outcome using random-effects model meta-analysis. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We included two studies from Taiwan with a total of 170 nurses. Most participants were young women with little work experience. The intervention group received education to prevent sexual harassment, and the comparison group received a different type of education to prevent sexual harassment. We found no studies that had a comparison group without any active educational or training components.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>Education and training interventions to prevent sexual harassment compared to control (no intervention, waiting list, placebo, or minimal intervention) in healthcare workers No studies addressed this comparison. Education and training interventions to prevent sexual harassment compared to other education and training interventions for healthcare workers We found two studies reporting on education and training interventions to prevent sexual harassment compared to other education and training interventions in healthcare workers. Educational interventions to prevent sexual harassment probably increase sexual harassment prevention knowledge slightly ('sexual harassment prevention', mean difference (MD) 4.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 8.28; P = 0.71; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; 2 RCTs, 168 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may increase management skills slightly ('coping behaviour', MD 6.36, 95% CI -6.84 to 19.56; P = 0.43; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; 2 RCTs, 168 participants; low-certainty evidence) and ('prevention strategy', MD 11.70, 95% CI 2.56 to 20.85; P = 0.22; I<sup>2</sup> = 33%; 2 RCTs, 168 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study evaluated the incidence of sexual harassment, anxiety, depression, burnout, sick leave, staff turnover, disability, or perception of the organisational climate related to harassment. Adverse effects were not measured or reported in the included studies. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to low. We judged the overall risk of bias as low, and we identified no inconsistency or publication bias. However, imprecision was more of a concern given the low number of participants and relatively broad CIs around the effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Healthcare workers may benefit from education and training compared to another type of education and training. The benefits were modest and were measured as increased knowledge ('sexual harassment prevention') and management skills ('coping behaviour' and 'prevention strategy'). The certainty of the evidence is moderate to low, and future studies could make the findings more robust. There is a need for future studies investigating other types of outcomes such as anxiety, depression, burnout, sick leave, staff turnover, disability, and perception of the organisational climate related to harassment. It would also be valuable to assess a wider range of healthcare workers, as we only found studies in nurses. No studies addressed the effects of education and training compared to control groups (no intervention, waiting list, placebo, or minimal intervention). The decision to offer sexual harassment education and training to healthcare workers is supported by the existing evidence. However, other contextual factors may also be considered, as well as healthcare workers' preferences to participate in educational activities.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Registration: Cochrane Collaboration, 19th of December 2023.</p><p><strong>Title: </strong>Education and training interventions for health care workers to prevent sexual harassment. Identification number: EMID:9ba735d2b5367171. Authors: Therese K Dalsbø, Rakel Aasheim Greve, Ingrid L Jørgensen, Marita S Fønhus.</p><p><strong>Protocol: </strong>Published on the 6th of February 2025 available via Cochrane Library at https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD016096.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD016096"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13656299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD016096.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Sexual harassment is common among healthcare workers and is associated with poor mental health, job dissatisfaction, and workforce attrition. Education and training may help prevent sexual harassment, but their effectiveness in healthcare settings has not been systematically evaluated.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of education and training interventions on knowledge and skills for managing sexual harassment, and to assess their impact on the incidence of sexual harassment towards healthcare workers in healthcare settings.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP, together with reference checking and contact with study authors, to identify eligible studies. The latest search date was March 2025.

Eligibility criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving healthcare workers comparing education or training interventions with control (no intervention, waiting list, placebo, or minimal intervention) or different types of education or training to prevent sexual harassment in healthcare settings.

Outcomes: Our critical outcomes were knowledge and skills in managing sexual harassment and the incidence of all types of sexual harassment perpetrated by patients, visitors, coworkers, and management. Important outcomes were anxiety, depression, burnout, sick leave, staff turnover, disability, and perception of the organisational climate related to harassment.

Risk of bias: We used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool to assess risk of bias.

Synthesis methods: We synthesised results for each outcome using random-effects model meta-analysis. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

Included studies: We included two studies from Taiwan with a total of 170 nurses. Most participants were young women with little work experience. The intervention group received education to prevent sexual harassment, and the comparison group received a different type of education to prevent sexual harassment. We found no studies that had a comparison group without any active educational or training components.

Synthesis of results: Education and training interventions to prevent sexual harassment compared to control (no intervention, waiting list, placebo, or minimal intervention) in healthcare workers No studies addressed this comparison. Education and training interventions to prevent sexual harassment compared to other education and training interventions for healthcare workers We found two studies reporting on education and training interventions to prevent sexual harassment compared to other education and training interventions in healthcare workers. Educational interventions to prevent sexual harassment probably increase sexual harassment prevention knowledge slightly ('sexual harassment prevention', mean difference (MD) 4.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 8.28; P = 0.71; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 168 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may increase management skills slightly ('coping behaviour', MD 6.36, 95% CI -6.84 to 19.56; P = 0.43; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 168 participants; low-certainty evidence) and ('prevention strategy', MD 11.70, 95% CI 2.56 to 20.85; P = 0.22; I2 = 33%; 2 RCTs, 168 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study evaluated the incidence of sexual harassment, anxiety, depression, burnout, sick leave, staff turnover, disability, or perception of the organisational climate related to harassment. Adverse effects were not measured or reported in the included studies. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to low. We judged the overall risk of bias as low, and we identified no inconsistency or publication bias. However, imprecision was more of a concern given the low number of participants and relatively broad CIs around the effect estimates.

Authors' conclusions: Healthcare workers may benefit from education and training compared to another type of education and training. The benefits were modest and were measured as increased knowledge ('sexual harassment prevention') and management skills ('coping behaviour' and 'prevention strategy'). The certainty of the evidence is moderate to low, and future studies could make the findings more robust. There is a need for future studies investigating other types of outcomes such as anxiety, depression, burnout, sick leave, staff turnover, disability, and perception of the organisational climate related to harassment. It would also be valuable to assess a wider range of healthcare workers, as we only found studies in nurses. No studies addressed the effects of education and training compared to control groups (no intervention, waiting list, placebo, or minimal intervention). The decision to offer sexual harassment education and training to healthcare workers is supported by the existing evidence. However, other contextual factors may also be considered, as well as healthcare workers' preferences to participate in educational activities.

Funding: This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

Registration: Registration: Cochrane Collaboration, 19th of December 2023.

Title: Education and training interventions for health care workers to prevent sexual harassment. Identification number: EMID:9ba735d2b5367171. Authors: Therese K Dalsbø, Rakel Aasheim Greve, Ingrid L Jørgensen, Marita S Fønhus.

Protocol: Published on the 6th of February 2025 available via Cochrane Library at https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD016096.

对保健工作者进行教育和培训,以防止性骚扰。
理由:性骚扰在卫生保健工作者中很常见,并与心理健康状况不佳、对工作不满意和劳动力流失有关。教育和培训可能有助于预防性骚扰,但其在医疗保健环境中的有效性尚未得到系统评估。目的:评估管理性骚扰知识和技能方面的教育和培训干预措施的有效性,并评估其对医疗保健机构医护人员遭受性骚扰发生率的影响。检索方法:我们检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、AMED、CINAHL、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO ICTRP,并进行了参考资料检查和与研究作者的联系,以确定符合条件的研究。最新的搜索日期是2025年3月。入选标准:我们纳入了涉及医护人员的随机对照试验(RCTs),将教育或培训干预与对照组(无干预、等候名单、安慰剂或最小干预)或不同类型的教育或培训进行比较,以防止医疗机构中的性骚扰。结果:我们的关键结果是管理性骚扰的知识和技能,以及由患者、来访者、同事和管理层实施的各种类型的性骚扰的发生率。重要的结果是焦虑、抑郁、倦怠、病假、员工离职、残疾和对与骚扰有关的组织氛围的看法。偏倚风险:我们使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险。综合方法:我们使用随机效应模型荟萃分析综合了每个结局的结果。我们使用GRADE来评估每个结果证据的确定性。纳入研究:我们纳入两项来自台湾的研究,共170名护士。大多数参与者都是没有多少工作经验的年轻女性。干预组接受性骚扰预防教育,对照组接受不同类型的性骚扰预防教育。我们没有发现一个没有任何积极的教育或培训成分的对照组。结果综合:将卫生保健工作者预防性骚扰的教育和培训干预与对照(无干预、等候名单、安慰剂或最小干预)进行比较,没有研究解决这一比较。我们发现两项研究报告了预防性骚扰的教育和培训干预措施与卫生保健工作者的其他教育和培训干预措施的比较。预防性骚扰的教育干预可能会略微增加预防性骚扰的知识(“性骚扰预防”,平均差异(MD) 4.74, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.21 ~ 8.28;P = 0.71;I2 = 0%;2项随机对照试验,168名受试者;中等确定性证据)并可能略微提高管理技能(“应对行为”,MD 6.36, 95% CI -6.84至19.56;P = 0.43; I2 = 0%; 2项随机对照试验,168名受试者;低确定性证据)和(“预防策略”,MD 11.70, 95% CI 2.56至20.85;P = 0.22; I2 = 33%; 2项随机对照试验,168名受试者;低确定性证据)。没有研究评估性骚扰、焦虑、抑郁、倦怠、病假、员工离职、残疾或对与骚扰有关的组织氛围的看法的发生率。在纳入的研究中没有测量或报告不良反应。证据的确定性从中等到低。我们认为总体偏倚风险较低,没有发现不一致或发表偏倚。然而,考虑到参与者人数少,影响估计的ci相对较宽,不准确性更令人担忧。作者的结论:卫生保健工作者可能受益于教育和培训而另一种类型的教育和培训。这些好处并不明显,主要体现在知识(“性骚扰预防”)和管理技能(“应对行为”和“预防策略”)的提高。证据的确定性是中等到低的,未来的研究可能会使这些发现更加有力。未来有必要对其他类型的结果进行研究,如焦虑、抑郁、倦怠、病假、员工离职、残疾和对与骚扰有关的组织氛围的看法。评估更大范围的医护人员也很有价值,因为我们只发现了护士的研究。与对照组(无干预、等候名单、安慰剂或最小干预)相比,没有研究讨论教育和培训的效果。向卫生保健工作者提供性骚扰教育和培训的决定得到了现有证据的支持。然而,其他背景因素也可以被考虑,以及医护人员参与教育活动的偏好。 资金来源:Cochrane综述没有专门的资金来源。注册:Cochrane Collaboration, 2023年12月19日。题目:保健工作者预防性骚扰的教育和培训干预措施。识别号:EMID:9ba735d2b5367171。作者:Therese K dalsborg, Rakel Aasheim Greve, Ingrid L Jørgensen, Marita S Fønhus。协议:于2025年2月6日发布,可通过Cochrane图书馆(https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD016096)获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书