Role of Psychological Resilience on Emotional Health in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Marta Katarzyna Hreńczuk, Tomasz Dawid Piątek, Joanna Gotlib-Małkowska, Mariusz Panczyk, Piotr Małkowski
{"title":"Role of Psychological Resilience on Emotional Health in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Marta Katarzyna Hreńczuk, Tomasz Dawid Piątek, Joanna Gotlib-Małkowska, Mariusz Panczyk, Piotr Małkowski","doi":"10.12659/AOT.952824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Psychological resilience is an increasingly recognized important protective factor for emotional health after solid organ transplantation; however, its role in the early post-transplant period is insufficiently explored. This study examined the role of psychological resilience in emotional health among kidney and liver transplant recipients, using a cross-sectional indirect-effect model. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted at 4 transplant centers in Poland. Adult kidney and liver transplant recipients were assessed the day before hospital discharge after transplantation (mean hospital stay: 19.62 days). The study included 117 participants (68.4% kidney and 31.6% liver transplant recipients). Perceived social support was assessed with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), psychological resilience with the Psychological Resilience Scale (SPP-25), and overall emotional distress with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Cross-sectional mediation analyses tested an indirect-effect model with MSPSS as the independent variable (X), SPP-25 as the mediator (M), and emotional distress measured by the HADS as the outcome variable (Y). RESULTS Participants reported moderate to high psychological resilience and high perceived social support, particularly from family and significant others, along with low to moderate emotional distress. Mediation analyses showed associations between perceived social support and emotional distress were statistically significant only as indirect effects mediated by psychological resilience. CONCLUSIONS In the early post-transplant period, psychological resilience is statistically associated with emotional health and may serve as an important mediator linking perceived social support to lower levels of emotional distress. These findings are consistent with a theoretical indirect-effect model and underscore the need for longitudinal studies to clarify temporal relationships in psychological adaptation after transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"31 ","pages":"e952824"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13676066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.952824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Psychological resilience is an increasingly recognized important protective factor for emotional health after solid organ transplantation; however, its role in the early post-transplant period is insufficiently explored. This study examined the role of psychological resilience in emotional health among kidney and liver transplant recipients, using a cross-sectional indirect-effect model. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted at 4 transplant centers in Poland. Adult kidney and liver transplant recipients were assessed the day before hospital discharge after transplantation (mean hospital stay: 19.62 days). The study included 117 participants (68.4% kidney and 31.6% liver transplant recipients). Perceived social support was assessed with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), psychological resilience with the Psychological Resilience Scale (SPP-25), and overall emotional distress with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Cross-sectional mediation analyses tested an indirect-effect model with MSPSS as the independent variable (X), SPP-25 as the mediator (M), and emotional distress measured by the HADS as the outcome variable (Y). RESULTS Participants reported moderate to high psychological resilience and high perceived social support, particularly from family and significant others, along with low to moderate emotional distress. Mediation analyses showed associations between perceived social support and emotional distress were statistically significant only as indirect effects mediated by psychological resilience. CONCLUSIONS In the early post-transplant period, psychological resilience is statistically associated with emotional health and may serve as an important mediator linking perceived social support to lower levels of emotional distress. These findings are consistent with a theoretical indirect-effect model and underscore the need for longitudinal studies to clarify temporal relationships in psychological adaptation after transplantation.

心理弹性对肾、肝移植受者情绪健康的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书