Enzo Lofredo Amorim, Edward Araujo Júnior, Mucio Cevulla da Silva Lourenço, Daniel Giatti de Sousa, Felipe Muniz Ferreira, Maria Fernanda Dos Santos Lobo, Henrique Provinciatto, Eduardo Moreira Nader, Antonio Braga, Roberta Granese
{"title":"Perinatal Outcomes of Pleuro-Amniotic Shunting in Isolated Pleural Effusions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Enzo Lofredo Amorim, Edward Araujo Júnior, Mucio Cevulla da Silva Lourenço, Daniel Giatti de Sousa, Felipe Muniz Ferreira, Maria Fernanda Dos Santos Lobo, Henrique Provinciatto, Eduardo Moreira Nader, Antonio Braga, Roberta Granese","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03809-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pleuro-amniotic shunting has been proposed for fetal pleural effusion, although its safety and efficacy remain uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of the fetal therapy for isolated pleural effusion through a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central were searched for studies reporting outcomes of fetuses undergoing pleuro-amniotic shunting for isolated pleural effusion. The primary outcomes were overall survival and resolution of fetal hydrops. Single-arm random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled event rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies comprising 416 fetuses treated with pleuro-amniotic shunting were included. The pooled overall survival rate was 65.36% (95% CI 59.46-70.83; I<sup>2</sup> = 30.7%). Resolution of fetal hydrops occurred in 62.25% of cases (95% CI 54.27-69.62; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). A total of 62 catheter displacements were recorded, corresponding to a combined prevalence of 17.13% (95% CI 13.59-21.36). Overall, there were 155 preterm births, resulting in a pooled prevalence of 69.67% (95% CI 61.24-76.95; I<sup>2</sup> = 26.9%). Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) prevalence was 17.65% (95% CI 7.78-35.28; I<sup>2</sup> = 84.5%; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pleuro-amniotic shunting achieves overall survival in approximately two-thirds of treated fetuses and resolving fetal hydrops in most cases. However, the procedure may be associated with preterm birth and PROM, underscoring the need for multidisciplinary perinatal management. Although the evidence is limited, these findings support pleuro-amniotic shunting as a promising treatment for progressive isolated fetal pleural effusion and highlight the need for prospective studies to optimize patient selection and perinatal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03809-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pleuro-amniotic shunting has been proposed for fetal pleural effusion, although its safety and efficacy remain uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of the fetal therapy for isolated pleural effusion through a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central were searched for studies reporting outcomes of fetuses undergoing pleuro-amniotic shunting for isolated pleural effusion. The primary outcomes were overall survival and resolution of fetal hydrops. Single-arm random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled event rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Ten retrospective cohort studies comprising 416 fetuses treated with pleuro-amniotic shunting were included. The pooled overall survival rate was 65.36% (95% CI 59.46-70.83; I2 = 30.7%). Resolution of fetal hydrops occurred in 62.25% of cases (95% CI 54.27-69.62; I2 = 0%). A total of 62 catheter displacements were recorded, corresponding to a combined prevalence of 17.13% (95% CI 13.59-21.36). Overall, there were 155 preterm births, resulting in a pooled prevalence of 69.67% (95% CI 61.24-76.95; I2 = 26.9%). Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) prevalence was 17.65% (95% CI 7.78-35.28; I2 = 84.5%; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Pleuro-amniotic shunting achieves overall survival in approximately two-thirds of treated fetuses and resolving fetal hydrops in most cases. However, the procedure may be associated with preterm birth and PROM, underscoring the need for multidisciplinary perinatal management. Although the evidence is limited, these findings support pleuro-amniotic shunting as a promising treatment for progressive isolated fetal pleural effusion and highlight the need for prospective studies to optimize patient selection and perinatal care.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.