Grazing reshapes plant nitrogen use trade-off between soil uptake and internal remobilization

IF 6.2 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Lin Wu, Kexin Li, Ziyuan Ma, Hao Wang, Yanlong Li, Yadong Wang, Pengfei Xing, Zhicheng Jin, Tongrui Zhang, Frank Yonghong Li
{"title":"Grazing reshapes plant nitrogen use trade-off between soil uptake and internal remobilization","authors":"Lin Wu,&nbsp;Kexin Li,&nbsp;Ziyuan Ma,&nbsp;Hao Wang,&nbsp;Yanlong Li,&nbsp;Yadong Wang,&nbsp;Pengfei Xing,&nbsp;Zhicheng Jin,&nbsp;Tongrui Zhang,&nbsp;Frank Yonghong Li","doi":"10.1111/tpj.71168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Perennial plants rely on two key ecological strategies to supply nitrogen (N) for photosynthetic tissue construction: root N remobilization (internal cycling) and soil N uptake. How plants trade-off these strategies determines the economy of N use and is likely context-dependent. Yet, it is rarely quantified <i>in situ</i> across growth stages and under varying management, limiting the mechanistic understanding of how plants rebalance N-use trade-offs to adapt to grazing disturbance. To address this gap, we conducted an <i>in situ</i> experiment using <sup>15</sup>N isotope labelling techniques in a semiarid grassland to quantify the contributions of these two strategies at two plant growth stages under nil, summer or autumn grazing. We found that the plant relied more on soil N uptake (58%) during the regreen stage, but more on N remobilization (57%) during the rapid-growth stage. Grazing, especially in autumn, significantly leaned N use trade-off toward conservative N remobilization. The shift in plant N use strategies was driven primarily by plant growth demand and soil N supply, but not root N stock. Plant N use trade-off leaned toward internal cycling when source traits were below or sink traits were above the thresholds, for example, soil N availability &lt;9.0 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> or shoot carbon content &gt;41.88%. Our study highlights the importance of the N resource-sink relations in mediating the trade-off in plant N use strategies, buffering grazing stress to grassland plants. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for improving ecosystem N cycling modeling and adaptive grazing management.</p>","PeriodicalId":233,"journal":{"name":"The Plant Journal","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13656187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Plant Journal","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tpj.71168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perennial plants rely on two key ecological strategies to supply nitrogen (N) for photosynthetic tissue construction: root N remobilization (internal cycling) and soil N uptake. How plants trade-off these strategies determines the economy of N use and is likely context-dependent. Yet, it is rarely quantified in situ across growth stages and under varying management, limiting the mechanistic understanding of how plants rebalance N-use trade-offs to adapt to grazing disturbance. To address this gap, we conducted an in situ experiment using 15N isotope labelling techniques in a semiarid grassland to quantify the contributions of these two strategies at two plant growth stages under nil, summer or autumn grazing. We found that the plant relied more on soil N uptake (58%) during the regreen stage, but more on N remobilization (57%) during the rapid-growth stage. Grazing, especially in autumn, significantly leaned N use trade-off toward conservative N remobilization. The shift in plant N use strategies was driven primarily by plant growth demand and soil N supply, but not root N stock. Plant N use trade-off leaned toward internal cycling when source traits were below or sink traits were above the thresholds, for example, soil N availability <9.0 mg kg−1 or shoot carbon content >41.88%. Our study highlights the importance of the N resource-sink relations in mediating the trade-off in plant N use strategies, buffering grazing stress to grassland plants. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for improving ecosystem N cycling modeling and adaptive grazing management.

放牧重塑了植物氮素利用在土壤吸收和内部再动员之间的权衡。
多年生植物依靠两种关键的生态策略为光合组织建设提供氮:根系氮再运输(内部循环)和土壤氮吸收。植物如何权衡这些策略决定了氮利用的经济性,并且可能依赖于环境。然而,在不同的生长阶段和不同的管理下,很少对其进行原位量化,这限制了对植物如何平衡氮利用权衡以适应放牧干扰的机制理解。为了解决这一差距,我们在半干旱草地上进行了一项原位实验,使用15N同位素标记技术来量化这两种策略在零放牧、夏季放牧和秋季放牧两个植物生长阶段的贡献。研究发现,在复绿期,植物主要依赖于土壤氮的吸收(58%),而在快速生长期,植物主要依赖于氮的再动员(57%)。放牧,尤其是秋季放牧,显著倾向于氮素利用平衡向保守氮素再动员倾斜。植物氮素利用策略的转变主要受植物生长需求和土壤氮供应的驱动,而不受根系氮储量的影响。当源性状低于阈值或汇性状高于阈值时,如土壤氮有效性-1或地上部碳含量>41.88%,植物氮利用权衡倾向于内部循环。本研究强调了氮资源库关系在调节植物氮利用策略的权衡、缓冲放牧胁迫对草地植物的重要性。这些发现为改进生态系统氮循环模型和适应性放牧管理提供了机制基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Plant Journal
The Plant Journal 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
415
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Publishing the best original research papers in all key areas of modern plant biology from the world"s leading laboratories, The Plant Journal provides a dynamic forum for this ever growing international research community. Plant science research is now at the forefront of research in the biological sciences, with breakthroughs in our understanding of fundamental processes in plants matching those in other organisms. The impact of molecular genetics and the availability of model and crop species can be seen in all aspects of plant biology. For publication in The Plant Journal the research must provide a highly significant new contribution to our understanding of plants and be of general interest to the plant science community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书