Filippo Dagnino, Stephan Korn, Danesha Daniels, Zhiyu Qian, Daniel Stelzl, Hanna Zurl, Klara Pohl, Mei-Chin Hsieh, Brenda Y Hernandez, Andrea Piccolini, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò M Buffi, Stuart R Lipsitz, Amanda Reich, Joel S Weissman, Alexander P Cole, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Hari S Iyer
{"title":"Association of Travel Time With Definitive Prostate Cancer Treatment: A United States Registry Cohort Study.","authors":"Filippo Dagnino, Stephan Korn, Danesha Daniels, Zhiyu Qian, Daniel Stelzl, Hanna Zurl, Klara Pohl, Mei-Chin Hsieh, Brenda Y Hernandez, Andrea Piccolini, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò M Buffi, Stuart R Lipsitz, Amanda Reich, Joel S Weissman, Alexander P Cole, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Hari S Iyer","doi":"10.1002/cam4.72376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) mortality disparities are partly driven by unequal access to care. Transportation barriers may limit access to definitive treatment. We studied how driving travel time affects receipt of definitive PCa treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study of men with non-metastatic PCa (2000-2015; follow-up through 2018) across the metropolitan area cancer registries of seven US states. Travel time was estimated using Google Maps isochrones representing driving time thresholds to reach the hospital appended to geomasked residential addresses. Outcomes were \"no treatment,\" \"radical surgery,\" or \"radiotherapy\". Covariate-adjusted multinomial logistic regression with interaction terms assessed modification by sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 132,939 men, of whom 37.0% received no treatment, 41.0% underwent surgery, and 22.0% received radiotherapy. Longer driving time (≥ 90 min vs. < 30 min) was associated with higher radical prostatectomy (aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.12), but lower radiotherapy (0.72, 95% CI: 0.69-0.76). Subgroup analyses revealed higher surgery associated with longer driving times among those in nSES Q1 (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.21-1.45) vs. Q5 (aOR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.04), those in low (aOR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.24) vs. high (aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.98-1.09) population density areas, and those with regional (aOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.14-1.48) vs. localized (aOR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09) disease. Longer driving time was mostly associated with lower odds of radiotherapy across sociodemographic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher travel time was associated with lower radiotherapy receipt, but higher surgery use in deprived and rural patients, warranting further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"15 10","pages":"e72376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) mortality disparities are partly driven by unequal access to care. Transportation barriers may limit access to definitive treatment. We studied how driving travel time affects receipt of definitive PCa treatment.
Materials and methods: We conducted a cohort study of men with non-metastatic PCa (2000-2015; follow-up through 2018) across the metropolitan area cancer registries of seven US states. Travel time was estimated using Google Maps isochrones representing driving time thresholds to reach the hospital appended to geomasked residential addresses. Outcomes were "no treatment," "radical surgery," or "radiotherapy". Covariate-adjusted multinomial logistic regression with interaction terms assessed modification by sociodemographic factors.
Results: The study included 132,939 men, of whom 37.0% received no treatment, 41.0% underwent surgery, and 22.0% received radiotherapy. Longer driving time (≥ 90 min vs. < 30 min) was associated with higher radical prostatectomy (aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.12), but lower radiotherapy (0.72, 95% CI: 0.69-0.76). Subgroup analyses revealed higher surgery associated with longer driving times among those in nSES Q1 (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.21-1.45) vs. Q5 (aOR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.04), those in low (aOR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.24) vs. high (aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.98-1.09) population density areas, and those with regional (aOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.14-1.48) vs. localized (aOR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09) disease. Longer driving time was mostly associated with lower odds of radiotherapy across sociodemographic subgroups.
Conclusions: Higher travel time was associated with lower radiotherapy receipt, but higher surgery use in deprived and rural patients, warranting further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.