Enhanced observation for management of agitated, confused or distressed behaviours in acute general hospitals: systematic review of quality and safety considerations.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Phoebe Averill, Simon Arday, Jan Kruczynski, Sirpa Tölli, Robert Latchford, Chris Sims, Dani Lewis, Ananya Hein, Nutmeg Hallett, Erik Mayer
{"title":"Enhanced observation for management of agitated, confused or distressed behaviours in acute general hospitals: systematic review of quality and safety considerations.","authors":"Phoebe Averill, Simon Arday, Jan Kruczynski, Sirpa Tölli, Robert Latchford, Chris Sims, Dani Lewis, Ananya Hein, Nutmeg Hallett, Erik Mayer","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.12130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People who are agitated, confused or distressed seldom receive holistic care within acute general hospitals. Unmet needs relating to conditions such as mental illnesses, learning disabilities or dementia can contribute to patient behaviours which staff find challenging to manage (e.g. self-harm). Enhanced observation, involving one-to-one care and monitoring, is a restrictive intervention often used to manage these presentations. The characteristics and outcomes of high-quality enhanced observation in this setting remain ill-defined, compromising quality and safety.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To understand what constitutes high-quality, safe enhanced observation in an acute general hospital for patients presenting with agitated, confused or distressed behaviours.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was performed, involving searches of five bibliographic databases, hand-searching, and forward and backward citation searching. Data describing the characteristics of high-quality, safe enhanced observation practice were eligible and included in a framework-based synthesis. Quality and safety outcomes were summarised thematically. Studies were appraised for quality, and data interpretation was shaped by lived experience experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty studies were included. Enhanced observation practice was influenced by individual staff members (e.g. attitudes), teams (e.g. teamwork fluency) and wider organisational factors (e.g. leadership, organisational culture). The quality and safety problems identified included self-harm, aggression and staff neglect of caring responsibilities during enhanced observation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings on the characteristics and outcomes of high-quality, safe enhanced observation provision should inform the development of evidence-based guidance to support improved, standardised practice in acute general hospitals. Evidence gaps with respect to patient experiences of enhanced observation and trauma-informed approaches to its delivery warrant urgent attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 6","pages":"e259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.12130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People who are agitated, confused or distressed seldom receive holistic care within acute general hospitals. Unmet needs relating to conditions such as mental illnesses, learning disabilities or dementia can contribute to patient behaviours which staff find challenging to manage (e.g. self-harm). Enhanced observation, involving one-to-one care and monitoring, is a restrictive intervention often used to manage these presentations. The characteristics and outcomes of high-quality enhanced observation in this setting remain ill-defined, compromising quality and safety.

Aims: To understand what constitutes high-quality, safe enhanced observation in an acute general hospital for patients presenting with agitated, confused or distressed behaviours.

Method: A systematic review was performed, involving searches of five bibliographic databases, hand-searching, and forward and backward citation searching. Data describing the characteristics of high-quality, safe enhanced observation practice were eligible and included in a framework-based synthesis. Quality and safety outcomes were summarised thematically. Studies were appraised for quality, and data interpretation was shaped by lived experience experts.

Results: Fifty studies were included. Enhanced observation practice was influenced by individual staff members (e.g. attitudes), teams (e.g. teamwork fluency) and wider organisational factors (e.g. leadership, organisational culture). The quality and safety problems identified included self-harm, aggression and staff neglect of caring responsibilities during enhanced observation.

Conclusions: Findings on the characteristics and outcomes of high-quality, safe enhanced observation provision should inform the development of evidence-based guidance to support improved, standardised practice in acute general hospitals. Evidence gaps with respect to patient experiences of enhanced observation and trauma-informed approaches to its delivery warrant urgent attention.

加强对急性综合医院焦虑、困惑或痛苦行为管理的观察:对质量和安全考虑的系统审查。
背景:人们谁是激动,困惑或痛苦很少接受整体护理在急性综合医院。与精神疾病、学习障碍或痴呆等病症相关的未满足需求可能导致患者行为难以管理(例如自残)。加强观察,包括一对一护理和监测,是一种限制性干预措施,通常用于管理这些症状。在这种情况下,高质量强化观察的特征和结果仍然不明确,影响了质量和安全性。目的:了解是什么构成了高质量,安全的加强观察在急性综合医院的患者表现出激动,困惑或痛苦的行为。方法:采用5个文献数据库检索、手工检索、前后引文检索等方法进行系统综述。描述高质量、安全的强化观测实践特征的数据符合条件,并纳入基于框架的综合。按主题总结质量和安全结果。对研究的质量进行评估,数据解释由生活经验专家塑造。结果:纳入50项研究。工作人员个人(例如态度)、团队(例如团队合作的流畅性)和更广泛的组织因素(例如领导力、组织文化)影响了观察实践的加强。所查明的质量和安全问题包括在加强观察期间自残、攻击和工作人员忽视照顾责任。结论:关于高质量、安全的强化观察提供的特点和结果的发现,应该为基于证据的指导的发展提供信息,以支持急诊综合医院改进、标准化的实践。加强观察的患者经验和创伤知情方法方面的证据差距值得紧急关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书