Oral and Fecal Microbial Dysbiosis as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.
{"title":"Oral and Fecal Microbial Dysbiosis as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.","authors":"Saidi Hu, Zhouyan Chen, Yanxia Li, Qingyan Liao, Mingdong Luo, Danyang Song, Hanyue Yu, Yuetong Gao, Shuanglong Yang, Siran Wan, Shunhong Zhang, Chenchen Luo, Lin-Yong Zhao","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal (EC), gastric (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), impose a substantial global burden, with early detection remaining crucial for improving patient outcomes. The oral and gut microbiota are increasingly implicated in cancer development and hold promise as sources of non-invasive biomarkers. However, current evidence on microbiome-based diagnostics remains fragmented, and a systematic comparison of the diagnostic accuracy between oral and fecal sampling across multiple GI cancer types is lacking. To address this gap, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to December 31, 2025, identified 43 case-control studies (59 cohorts) comprising 4452 cancer patients and 5809 controls. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.824-0.867), though with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 86.5%). By cancer type, pooled AUCs were 0.746 for EC (5 cohorts), 0.886 for GC (8 cohorts), and 0.850 for CRC (46 cohorts). A bivariate analysis of 20 cohorts comparing sample types found no statistically significant difference in diagnostic performance between oral (sAUC = 0.863) and fecal sampling (sAUC = 0.820; p = 0.369). While these exploratory findings suggest that oral and fecal microbial biomarkers may offer comparable diagnostic accuracy for GI cancers, with oral sampling presenting a more practical option for screening, the results are preliminary. Significant heterogeneity, a limited number of oral cohorts, and the absence of clinical control groups highlight the need for large-scale prospective studies with direct comparisons and real-world validation to validate these biomarkers for clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70779","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal (EC), gastric (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), impose a substantial global burden, with early detection remaining crucial for improving patient outcomes. The oral and gut microbiota are increasingly implicated in cancer development and hold promise as sources of non-invasive biomarkers. However, current evidence on microbiome-based diagnostics remains fragmented, and a systematic comparison of the diagnostic accuracy between oral and fecal sampling across multiple GI cancer types is lacking. To address this gap, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to December 31, 2025, identified 43 case-control studies (59 cohorts) comprising 4452 cancer patients and 5809 controls. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.824-0.867), though with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 86.5%). By cancer type, pooled AUCs were 0.746 for EC (5 cohorts), 0.886 for GC (8 cohorts), and 0.850 for CRC (46 cohorts). A bivariate analysis of 20 cohorts comparing sample types found no statistically significant difference in diagnostic performance between oral (sAUC = 0.863) and fecal sampling (sAUC = 0.820; p = 0.369). While these exploratory findings suggest that oral and fecal microbial biomarkers may offer comparable diagnostic accuracy for GI cancers, with oral sampling presenting a more practical option for screening, the results are preliminary. Significant heterogeneity, a limited number of oral cohorts, and the absence of clinical control groups highlight the need for large-scale prospective studies with direct comparisons and real-world validation to validate these biomarkers for clinical translation.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories:
-Cancer Epidemiology-
Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics-
Infectious Causes of Cancer-
Innovative Tools and Methods-
Molecular Cancer Biology-
Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment-
Tumor Markers and Signatures-
Cancer Therapy and Prevention