Oral and Fecal Microbial Dysbiosis as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Saidi Hu, Zhouyan Chen, Yanxia Li, Qingyan Liao, Mingdong Luo, Danyang Song, Hanyue Yu, Yuetong Gao, Shuanglong Yang, Siran Wan, Shunhong Zhang, Chenchen Luo, Lin-Yong Zhao
{"title":"Oral and Fecal Microbial Dysbiosis as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.","authors":"Saidi Hu, Zhouyan Chen, Yanxia Li, Qingyan Liao, Mingdong Luo, Danyang Song, Hanyue Yu, Yuetong Gao, Shuanglong Yang, Siran Wan, Shunhong Zhang, Chenchen Luo, Lin-Yong Zhao","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal (EC), gastric (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), impose a substantial global burden, with early detection remaining crucial for improving patient outcomes. The oral and gut microbiota are increasingly implicated in cancer development and hold promise as sources of non-invasive biomarkers. However, current evidence on microbiome-based diagnostics remains fragmented, and a systematic comparison of the diagnostic accuracy between oral and fecal sampling across multiple GI cancer types is lacking. To address this gap, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to December 31, 2025, identified 43 case-control studies (59 cohorts) comprising 4452 cancer patients and 5809 controls. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.824-0.867), though with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 86.5%). By cancer type, pooled AUCs were 0.746 for EC (5 cohorts), 0.886 for GC (8 cohorts), and 0.850 for CRC (46 cohorts). A bivariate analysis of 20 cohorts comparing sample types found no statistically significant difference in diagnostic performance between oral (sAUC = 0.863) and fecal sampling (sAUC = 0.820; p = 0.369). While these exploratory findings suggest that oral and fecal microbial biomarkers may offer comparable diagnostic accuracy for GI cancers, with oral sampling presenting a more practical option for screening, the results are preliminary. Significant heterogeneity, a limited number of oral cohorts, and the absence of clinical control groups highlight the need for large-scale prospective studies with direct comparisons and real-world validation to validate these biomarkers for clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70779","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal (EC), gastric (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), impose a substantial global burden, with early detection remaining crucial for improving patient outcomes. The oral and gut microbiota are increasingly implicated in cancer development and hold promise as sources of non-invasive biomarkers. However, current evidence on microbiome-based diagnostics remains fragmented, and a systematic comparison of the diagnostic accuracy between oral and fecal sampling across multiple GI cancer types is lacking. To address this gap, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to December 31, 2025, identified 43 case-control studies (59 cohorts) comprising 4452 cancer patients and 5809 controls. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.824-0.867), though with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 86.5%). By cancer type, pooled AUCs were 0.746 for EC (5 cohorts), 0.886 for GC (8 cohorts), and 0.850 for CRC (46 cohorts). A bivariate analysis of 20 cohorts comparing sample types found no statistically significant difference in diagnostic performance between oral (sAUC = 0.863) and fecal sampling (sAUC = 0.820; p = 0.369). While these exploratory findings suggest that oral and fecal microbial biomarkers may offer comparable diagnostic accuracy for GI cancers, with oral sampling presenting a more practical option for screening, the results are preliminary. Significant heterogeneity, a limited number of oral cohorts, and the absence of clinical control groups highlight the need for large-scale prospective studies with direct comparisons and real-world validation to validate these biomarkers for clinical translation.

口腔和粪便微生物生态失调作为胃肠道癌症的无创诊断生物标志物:诊断准确性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
胃肠道(GI)癌症,包括食管癌(EC)、胃癌(GC)和结直肠癌(CRC),给全球带来了巨大的负担,早期发现对于改善患者预后仍然至关重要。口腔和肠道微生物群越来越多地与癌症的发展有关,并有望成为非侵入性生物标志物的来源。然而,目前关于基于微生物组的诊断的证据仍然不完整,并且缺乏对多种胃肠道癌症类型的口腔和粪便采样之间诊断准确性的系统比较。为了解决这一差距,系统检索PubMed, Embase和Scopus,截至2025年12月31日,确定了43个病例对照研究(59个队列),包括4452名癌症患者和5809名对照。合并曲线下面积(AUC)为0.846 (95% CI: 0.824-0.867),但存在较大异质性(I2 = 86.5%)。按癌症类型划分,EC的合并auc为0.746(5个队列),GC为0.886(8个队列),CRC为0.850(46个队列)。对20个比较样本类型的队列进行双变量分析发现,口腔(sAUC = 0.863)和粪便(sAUC = 0.820; p = 0.369)的诊断性能无统计学差异。虽然这些探索性发现表明,口腔和粪便微生物生物标志物可能对胃肠道癌症提供相当的诊断准确性,但口腔采样提供了更实用的筛查选择,但结果是初步的。显著的异质性,有限数量的口服队列,以及缺乏临床对照组,突出了需要进行大规模的前瞻性研究,直接比较和现实世界验证,以验证这些生物标志物的临床翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书