Field investigation on prefabricated radiant drain (PRD) vacuum preloading for soft ground reinforcement effectiveness: a case study

IF 6.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Huayang Lei, Jiankai Li, Shuangxi Feng, Tianlu Ma, Guoqing Zhang, Shengpeng Yu
{"title":"Field investigation on prefabricated radiant drain (PRD) vacuum preloading for soft ground reinforcement effectiveness: a case study","authors":"Huayang Lei,&nbsp;Jiankai Li,&nbsp;Shuangxi Feng,&nbsp;Tianlu Ma,&nbsp;Guoqing Zhang,&nbsp;Shengpeng Yu","doi":"10.1007/s11440-026-03034-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conventional vacuum preloading methods often encounter issues such as clogging around prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs), leading to uneven soil consolidation and differential ground settlement. To address these limitations, the prefabricated radiant drain (PRD) vacuum preloading method was proposed. To verify the engineering performance of the PRD vacuum preloading technology under real and complex geological conditions, this study investigates the effectiveness of the PRD vacuum preloading method in reinforcing soft ground through a full-scale field test at the Huanghua Port Bulk Cargo Terminal Mineral Powder Storage Yard Project in Hebei Province, China. The test compared the PRD method with the conventional PVD vacuum preloading technique over an area of more than 200 m<sup>2</sup>. Results indicate that the PRD method significantly enhances soil reinforcement, increasing average surface settlement by 35.6% and reducing final average pore water pressure by 24.5% compared to the conventional method. The average vane shear strength of the soil after reinforcement using PRD increased by 21.7%, while the average water content decreased by 22.0%. Additionally, PRD effectively mitigated non-uniform consolidation, reducing differential pore water pressure changes by 38.1% and decreasing the variation in soil shear strength at both the PRD locations and the midpoints between adjacent PRDs. This study confirms that PRD technology offers significant advantages in efficiently and environmentally friendly reinforcing soft ground and recycling dredged silt, providing valuable insights for similar projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"21 8","pages":"5219 - 5237"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-026-03034-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional vacuum preloading methods often encounter issues such as clogging around prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs), leading to uneven soil consolidation and differential ground settlement. To address these limitations, the prefabricated radiant drain (PRD) vacuum preloading method was proposed. To verify the engineering performance of the PRD vacuum preloading technology under real and complex geological conditions, this study investigates the effectiveness of the PRD vacuum preloading method in reinforcing soft ground through a full-scale field test at the Huanghua Port Bulk Cargo Terminal Mineral Powder Storage Yard Project in Hebei Province, China. The test compared the PRD method with the conventional PVD vacuum preloading technique over an area of more than 200 m2. Results indicate that the PRD method significantly enhances soil reinforcement, increasing average surface settlement by 35.6% and reducing final average pore water pressure by 24.5% compared to the conventional method. The average vane shear strength of the soil after reinforcement using PRD increased by 21.7%, while the average water content decreased by 22.0%. Additionally, PRD effectively mitigated non-uniform consolidation, reducing differential pore water pressure changes by 38.1% and decreasing the variation in soil shear strength at both the PRD locations and the midpoints between adjacent PRDs. This study confirms that PRD technology offers significant advantages in efficiently and environmentally friendly reinforcing soft ground and recycling dredged silt, providing valuable insights for similar projects.

预制辐射漏(PRD)真空预压对软土地基加固效果的现场研究:一个实例研究
传统的真空预压方法经常会遇到预制垂直排水管(PVDs)周围堵塞等问题,导致土壤固结不均匀和地面沉降差异。针对这些局限性,提出了预制辐射漏极(PRD)真空预压方法。为了验证PRD真空预压技术在真实复杂地质条件下的工程性能,本研究通过对河北省黄骅港散货码头矿粉堆场工程的全尺寸现场试验,研究了PRD真空预压技术在软土地基加固中的有效性。试验将PRD方法与传统PVD真空预压技术在200多平方米的面积上进行了比较。结果表明,与常规方法相比,PRD方法显著增强了土体的加固效果,平均地表沉降增加35.6%,最终平均孔隙水压力降低24.5%。PRD加固后土体的平均叶片抗剪强度提高了21.7%,平均含水率下降了22.0%。此外,珠江三角洲有效地缓解了非均匀固结,将孔隙水压力差变化减少了38.1%,并降低了珠江三角洲地区和邻近珠江三角洲之间中点的土壤抗剪强度变化。这项研究证实珠三角技术在有效和环保地加固软土地基和回收疏浚淤泥方面具有显著优势,为类似项目提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书