Observed drained shear performance of rubber–sand mixtures under fixed principal stress orientations

IF 6.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Beibing Dai, Pengfei Liu, Haojie Zheng, Jun Yang
{"title":"Observed drained shear performance of rubber–sand mixtures under fixed principal stress orientations","authors":"Beibing Dai,&nbsp;Pengfei Liu,&nbsp;Haojie Zheng,&nbsp;Jun Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11440-026-02977-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A number of hollow-cylinder torsional shear tests were done in the drained condition to investigate the strength and deformation behaviour of rubber–sand mixtures (RSMs) at various major principal stress orientations (<i>α</i><sub><i>σ</i></sub> = 0°~90°). The test results indicate that the addition of rubber particles makes the shear strength of granular soils reduce and the volumetric contraction increase, with the minimum shear strength and maximum volumetric strain occurring around <i>α</i><sub><i>σ</i></sub> = 45°~75° for RSMs. The stress–dilatancy relationship can be described by a linear function for pure sand and a cubic function for RSMs, which is revealed to be also dependent on the major principal stress orientation <i>α</i><sub><i>σ</i></sub>. The phenomenon of stress–strain non-coaxiality is observed for both pure sand and RSMs at <i>α</i><sub><i>σ</i></sub> = 15°, 30°, 60°, and 75°, and the strength envelope takes on an asymmetric semicircular shape in the deviatoric stress plane. The occurrence of the minimum shear strength at <i>α</i><sub><i>σ</i></sub> = 45°~75° is correlated with a relatively small orientation difference between the mobilized shear plane and the bedding plane at <i>α</i><sub><i>σ</i></sub> = 45°~75°; a small orientation discrepancy between these two planes makes particles easily slide and experience a less marked interlocking effect along the shear failure plane. Furthermore, the stress–strain non-coaxiality is clarified from a theoretical perspective, through an analysis of plastic strain increment development based on the strain Mohr circle and conceptual model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"21 8","pages":"4607 - 4625"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-026-02977-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of hollow-cylinder torsional shear tests were done in the drained condition to investigate the strength and deformation behaviour of rubber–sand mixtures (RSMs) at various major principal stress orientations (ασ = 0°~90°). The test results indicate that the addition of rubber particles makes the shear strength of granular soils reduce and the volumetric contraction increase, with the minimum shear strength and maximum volumetric strain occurring around ασ = 45°~75° for RSMs. The stress–dilatancy relationship can be described by a linear function for pure sand and a cubic function for RSMs, which is revealed to be also dependent on the major principal stress orientation ασ. The phenomenon of stress–strain non-coaxiality is observed for both pure sand and RSMs at ασ = 15°, 30°, 60°, and 75°, and the strength envelope takes on an asymmetric semicircular shape in the deviatoric stress plane. The occurrence of the minimum shear strength at ασ = 45°~75° is correlated with a relatively small orientation difference between the mobilized shear plane and the bedding plane at ασ = 45°~75°; a small orientation discrepancy between these two planes makes particles easily slide and experience a less marked interlocking effect along the shear failure plane. Furthermore, the stress–strain non-coaxiality is clarified from a theoretical perspective, through an analysis of plastic strain increment development based on the strain Mohr circle and conceptual model.

观察固定主应力方向下橡胶-砂混合料的排水剪切性能
在排水条件下,对橡胶-砂混合料(rsm)在不同主应力方向(ασ = 0°~90°)下的强度和变形特性进行了试验研究。试验结果表明:橡胶颗粒的加入使颗粒土的抗剪强度降低,体积收缩增大,最小抗剪强度和最大体积应变出现在ασ = 45°~75°附近;对于纯砂,应力-剪胀关系可以用线性函数来描述,对于rsm,则可以用三次函数来描述,并且还依赖于主应力方向ασ。在ασ = 15°、30°、60°和75°时,纯砂和rsm均出现应力-应变非同轴现象,且强度包络线在偏应力面上呈现不对称的半圆形状。ασ = 45°~75°处出现最小抗剪强度与ασ = 45°~75°处动员剪切面与顺层面取向差较小有关;这两个面之间的取向差异很小,使得颗粒容易沿着剪切破坏面滑动,并且经历不太明显的联锁效应。此外,通过基于应变莫尔圆和概念模型的塑性应变增量发展分析,从理论角度阐明了应力-应变非同轴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书