Thermodynamic and Emission Performance of SOFC-GT Hybrids with Dual Recirculation Strategies

IF 3.4 4区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Suthin Pholboorn, Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, Dang Saebea, Amornchai Arpornwichanop
{"title":"Thermodynamic and Emission Performance of SOFC-GT Hybrids with Dual Recirculation Strategies","authors":"Suthin Pholboorn,&nbsp;Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot,&nbsp;Dang Saebea,&nbsp;Amornchai Arpornwichanop","doi":"10.1007/s11814-026-00777-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine (SOFC-GT) hybrid systems offer high efficiency and low emissions for sustainable power generation. This study compares two SOFC-GT configurations with different exhaust gas recirculation strategies: SOFC-GT-RAN (anode recirculation) and SOFC-GT-RAB (afterburner recirculation). Both systems were modeled in Aspen Plus using methane with 10% pre-reforming. Parametric analyses were conducted to examine the influence of fuel utilization, steam-to-carbon ratio, SOFC operating temperature, and recirculation ratio on system performance. The results show that SOFC-GT-RAN consistently outperforms SOFC-GT-RAB in terms of power output, efficiency, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. At optimal conditions (SOFC temperature = 1173 K, fuel utilization = 0.90, steam-to-carbon ratio = 2.0, anode recirculation ratio = 0.30, afterburner recirculation ratio = 0.10), SOFC-GT-RAN achieved SOFC and net powers of 208.51 kW and 207.47 kW, compared to 156.43 kW and 158.01 kW for SOFC-GT-RAB. Energy and exergy efficiencies were 93.18% and 89.81% for RAN, substantially higher than 70.96% and 68.40% for RAB. Moreover, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were lower for RAN (205.98 kg/MWh) than for RAB (268.82 kg/MWh). These findings confirm that anode exhaust gas recirculation provides superior technical and environmental performance, highlighting SOFC-GT-RAN as a promising pathway for efficient and clean hybrid power generation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":684,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"43 12","pages":"3415 - 3430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11814-026-00777-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine (SOFC-GT) hybrid systems offer high efficiency and low emissions for sustainable power generation. This study compares two SOFC-GT configurations with different exhaust gas recirculation strategies: SOFC-GT-RAN (anode recirculation) and SOFC-GT-RAB (afterburner recirculation). Both systems were modeled in Aspen Plus using methane with 10% pre-reforming. Parametric analyses were conducted to examine the influence of fuel utilization, steam-to-carbon ratio, SOFC operating temperature, and recirculation ratio on system performance. The results show that SOFC-GT-RAN consistently outperforms SOFC-GT-RAB in terms of power output, efficiency, and CO2 emissions. At optimal conditions (SOFC temperature = 1173 K, fuel utilization = 0.90, steam-to-carbon ratio = 2.0, anode recirculation ratio = 0.30, afterburner recirculation ratio = 0.10), SOFC-GT-RAN achieved SOFC and net powers of 208.51 kW and 207.47 kW, compared to 156.43 kW and 158.01 kW for SOFC-GT-RAB. Energy and exergy efficiencies were 93.18% and 89.81% for RAN, substantially higher than 70.96% and 68.40% for RAB. Moreover, CO2 emissions were lower for RAN (205.98 kg/MWh) than for RAB (268.82 kg/MWh). These findings confirm that anode exhaust gas recirculation provides superior technical and environmental performance, highlighting SOFC-GT-RAN as a promising pathway for efficient and clean hybrid power generation.

双循环策略下SOFC-GT混合动力汽车的热力学与排放性能
固体氧化物燃料电池-燃气轮机(SOFC-GT)混合动力系统为可持续发电提供高效率和低排放。本研究比较了两种具有不同废气再循环策略的SOFC-GT配置:SOFC-GT- ran(阳极再循环)和SOFC-GT- rab(加力再循环)。两种体系都在Aspen Plus中使用10%预重整的甲烷进行建模。通过参数分析,考察了燃料利用率、蒸汽碳比、SOFC工作温度和再循环比对系统性能的影响。结果表明,SOFC-GT-RAN在功率输出、效率和二氧化碳排放方面始终优于SOFC-GT-RAB。在最佳条件下(SOFC温度= 1173 K,燃料利用率= 0.90,蒸汽碳比= 2.0,阳极再循环比= 0.30,加力再循环比= 0.10),SOFC- gt - ran的SOFC和净功率分别为208.51 kW和207.47 kW,而SOFC- gt - rab的SOFC和净功率分别为156.43 kW和158.01 kW。RAN的能量效率和火用效率分别为93.18%和89.81%,显著高于RAB的70.96%和68.40%。此外,RAN的二氧化碳排放量(205.98 kg/MWh)低于RAB (268.82 kg/MWh)。这些研究结果证实,阳极废气再循环具有卓越的技术和环境性能,突出了SOFC-GT-RAN作为高效清洁混合发电的有前途的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
310
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering provides a global forum for the dissemination of research in chemical engineering. The Journal publishes significant research results obtained in the Asia-Pacific region, and simultaneously introduces recent technical progress made in other areas of the world to this region. Submitted research papers must be of potential industrial significance and specifically concerned with chemical engineering. The editors will give preference to papers having a clearly stated practical scope and applicability in the areas of chemical engineering, and to those where new theoretical concepts are supported by new experimental details. The Journal also regularly publishes featured reviews on emerging and industrially important subjects of chemical engineering as well as selected papers presented at international conferences on the subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书