{"title":"Association of virulence genes with biofilm formation in clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Abdulhamit Çalı, Safiye Göçer","doi":"10.1007/s00203-026-05261-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis examined association between virulence gene carriage and phenotypic biofilm formation in human clinical <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> isolates. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on April 9, 2026, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261405485). Eligible studies used microplate-based biofilm assessment, detected virulence genes, and provided extractable 2 × 2 data. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios (OR). Twenty-six studies comprising 1848 isolates were included. For strong versus non-strong biofilm formation, <i>esp</i> (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.32–4.13), <i>efaA</i> (OR 26.28, 95% CI 1.12–614.84), and <i>sprE</i> (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.18–7.92) showed significant associations, although <i>efaA</i> and <i>sprE</i> estimates were based on few studies and were imprecise. For any biofilm versus no biofilm formation, <i>asa1</i> (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.39–4.67), <i>esp</i> (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.82–4.04), <i>agg</i> (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.25–2.78), and <i>cylA</i> (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.20–3.91) were significant. Sensitivity analyses identified <i>esp</i> as the most consistent association, although heterogeneity remained for strong biofilm formation. Gene-biofilm associations were gene-specific and phenotype-dependent. <i>esp</i> positivity alone is insufficient to predict biofilm phenotype because biofilm formation is multifactorial and context dependent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8279,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Microbiology","volume":"209 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-026-05261-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined association between virulence gene carriage and phenotypic biofilm formation in human clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolates. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on April 9, 2026, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261405485). Eligible studies used microplate-based biofilm assessment, detected virulence genes, and provided extractable 2 × 2 data. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios (OR). Twenty-six studies comprising 1848 isolates were included. For strong versus non-strong biofilm formation, esp (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.32–4.13), efaA (OR 26.28, 95% CI 1.12–614.84), and sprE (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.18–7.92) showed significant associations, although efaA and sprE estimates were based on few studies and were imprecise. For any biofilm versus no biofilm formation, asa1 (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.39–4.67), esp (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.82–4.04), agg (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.25–2.78), and cylA (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.20–3.91) were significant. Sensitivity analyses identified esp as the most consistent association, although heterogeneity remained for strong biofilm formation. Gene-biofilm associations were gene-specific and phenotype-dependent. esp positivity alone is insufficient to predict biofilm phenotype because biofilm formation is multifactorial and context dependent.
期刊介绍:
Research papers must make a significant and original contribution to
microbiology and be of interest to a broad readership. The results of any
experimental approach that meets these objectives are welcome, particularly
biochemical, molecular genetic, physiological, and/or physical investigations into
microbial cells and their interactions with their environments, including their eukaryotic hosts.
Mini-reviews in areas of special topical interest and papers on medical microbiology, ecology and systematics, including description of novel taxa, are also published.
Theoretical papers and those that report on the analysis or ''mining'' of data are
acceptable in principle if new information, interpretations, or hypotheses
emerge.