Online identification for characterizing renal pressure–flow dynamics during ex vivo rabbit kidney NMP: A proof-of-concept study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.bbe.2026.09.001
Shiwei Wang, Junwei Jiang, Jiang Zhang, Jie Hou, Hanlin Wang, Xiaolei Chen, Haowen Luo, Shutong Bai, Daidi Zhong, Pan Yang
{"title":"Online identification for characterizing renal pressure–flow dynamics during ex vivo rabbit kidney NMP: A proof-of-concept study","authors":"Shiwei Wang,&nbsp;Junwei Jiang,&nbsp;Jiang Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Hou,&nbsp;Hanlin Wang,&nbsp;Xiaolei Chen,&nbsp;Haowen Luo,&nbsp;Shutong Bai,&nbsp;Daidi Zhong,&nbsp;Pan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.bbe.2026.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Objective</strong>Ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) supports kidney preservation and assessment, but conventional measurements mainly describe operating-point or endpoint conditions. This proof-of-concept study examined whether controlled flow perturbation and online system identification can characterize renal pressure–flow dynamics during rabbit kidney NMP.</div><div><strong>Methods</strong>Three isolated rabbit kidneys (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></math></span>) were perfused on a custom NMP platform. Pseudo-random binary sequence perturbations were applied to nominal pump-commanded perfusion flow, with renal arterial pressure as the output. Second-, third-, and fourth-order transfer-function models were identified using recursive least squares with adaptive multiple forgetting factors (RLS-MFF). Chronological online tracking was assessed using FIT and RMSE; fixed training-end models were evaluated using AIC/BIC, residual autocorrelation, and Ljung–Box testing. Parameter trajectories and frequency responses were also examined.</div><div><strong>Results</strong>Online adaptive tracking accuracy increased with model order. For the selected third-order structure, online-evaluation FIT ranged from 84.81% to 86.00%, with a mean RMSE of 1.48 mmHg. Fourth-order models achieved the highest FIT and lowest RMSE but required two additional coefficients. AIC/BIC favored the third-order model in two records, while both third- and fourth-order structures satisfied the primary 10-lag Ljung–Box criterion in two of three records.</div><div><strong>Conclusion</strong>Controlled hydraulic perturbation and adaptive online identification provided kidney-specific pressure–flow dynamic descriptors during rabbit kidney NMP. The third-order model offered a parsimonious common structure across records. With only three kidneys and no independent kidney-quality reference outcome, the findings demonstrate methodological feasibility rather than validated organ assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55381,"journal":{"name":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":"46 4","pages":"Pages 676-695"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521626000690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveEx vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) supports kidney preservation and assessment, but conventional measurements mainly describe operating-point or endpoint conditions. This proof-of-concept study examined whether controlled flow perturbation and online system identification can characterize renal pressure–flow dynamics during rabbit kidney NMP.
MethodsThree isolated rabbit kidneys (n=3) were perfused on a custom NMP platform. Pseudo-random binary sequence perturbations were applied to nominal pump-commanded perfusion flow, with renal arterial pressure as the output. Second-, third-, and fourth-order transfer-function models were identified using recursive least squares with adaptive multiple forgetting factors (RLS-MFF). Chronological online tracking was assessed using FIT and RMSE; fixed training-end models were evaluated using AIC/BIC, residual autocorrelation, and Ljung–Box testing. Parameter trajectories and frequency responses were also examined.
ResultsOnline adaptive tracking accuracy increased with model order. For the selected third-order structure, online-evaluation FIT ranged from 84.81% to 86.00%, with a mean RMSE of 1.48 mmHg. Fourth-order models achieved the highest FIT and lowest RMSE but required two additional coefficients. AIC/BIC favored the third-order model in two records, while both third- and fourth-order structures satisfied the primary 10-lag Ljung–Box criterion in two of three records.
ConclusionControlled hydraulic perturbation and adaptive online identification provided kidney-specific pressure–flow dynamic descriptors during rabbit kidney NMP. The third-order model offered a parsimonious common structure across records. With only three kidneys and no independent kidney-quality reference outcome, the findings demonstrate methodological feasibility rather than validated organ assessment.
兔离体肾NMP过程中肾脏压力-血流动力学特征的在线识别:一项概念验证研究
目的体外恒温机器灌注(NMP)支持肾脏保存和评估,但常规测量主要描述操作点或终点条件。这项概念验证研究考察了控制流量扰动和在线系统识别是否可以表征兔肾脏NMP期间的肾脏压力-流动动力学。方法3个离体兔肾(n=3)在特制的NMP平台上灌注。伪随机二值序列扰动应用于标称泵命令灌注流量,肾动脉压作为输出。采用递归最小二乘法和自适应多重遗忘因子(RLS-MFF)对二、三、四阶传递函数模型进行了识别。使用FIT和RMSE评估时间在线跟踪;使用AIC/BIC、残差自相关和Ljung-Box检验对固定训练端模型进行评估。参数轨迹和频率响应也进行了检查。结果在线自适应跟踪精度随模型阶数的增加而增加。对于所选择的三阶结构,在线评价FIT范围为84.81% ~ 86.00%,平均RMSE为1.48 mmHg。四阶模型获得了最高的FIT和最低的RMSE,但需要两个附加系数。AIC/BIC在两个记录中倾向于三阶模型,而在三个记录中的两个记录中,三阶和四阶结构都满足初级10滞后Ljung-Box准则。结论可控水力扰动和自适应在线辨识是兔肾NMP过程中肾特异性压力-流量动态描述符。三阶模型在记录之间提供了一个简洁的公共结构。只有三个肾脏,没有独立的肾脏质量参考结果,研究结果证明了方法上的可行性,而不是验证的器官评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering is a quarterly journal, founded in 1981, devoted to publishing the results of original, innovative and creative research investigations in the field of Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering, which bridges mathematical, physical, chemical and engineering methods and technology to analyse physiological processes in living organisms as well as to develop methods, devices and systems used in biology and medicine, mainly in medical diagnosis, monitoring systems and therapy. The Journal''s mission is to advance scientific discovery into new or improved standards of care, and promotion a wide-ranging exchange between science and its application to humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书