Legacy plugged and buried wells: A limited contribution to Germany's methane emissions

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
S. Schloemer, M. Blumenberg, S.F.A. Jordan
{"title":"Legacy plugged and buried wells: A limited contribution to Germany's methane emissions","authors":"S. Schloemer,&nbsp;M. Blumenberg,&nbsp;S.F.A. Jordan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2026.104801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells are increasingly recognized as potential contributors to anthropogenic greenhouse gas inventories. However, empirical data regarding the long-term integrity of plugged and buried wells in Germany remains sparse. This study aims to quantify CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes from legacy wells in Lower Saxony (Northern Germany) to evaluate their environmental relevance.</div><div>We conducted a field survey of 92 wells. The study design employed a multi-tiered approach, integrating surface flux measurements with soil gas analysis. To distinguish between deep thermogenic leakage and shallow biogenic signals, we analyzed soil gas compositions (hydrocarbons, CO<sub>2</sub>) and stable carbon isotope ratios at both, well locations and reference grids.</div><div>Statistical analysis reveals no significant differences in methane concentrations or flux rates between well locations and reference sites. Of the 92 wells examined, 20 showed at least one positive emission at the surface. Only 3 indicate time-varying and low leaking of natural gas (max 40 mg/h/well); two revealed an anomaly (possible shallow biogenic gas) and the remainder are considered natural background levels or are caused by other processes (e.g. peat mining).</div><div>The findings suggest that plugged and buried wells in Germany do not reveal systemic integrity failures and indicates that abandonment practices are effective. Further, microbial methane oxidation in the vadose zone may also serve as an efficient natural filter. While caution is warranted when upscaling these results to the &gt;25,000 legacy wells nationwide, this study implies that these features represent a limited contribution to Germany’s methane emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104801"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583626002331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methane (CH4) emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells are increasingly recognized as potential contributors to anthropogenic greenhouse gas inventories. However, empirical data regarding the long-term integrity of plugged and buried wells in Germany remains sparse. This study aims to quantify CH4 fluxes from legacy wells in Lower Saxony (Northern Germany) to evaluate their environmental relevance.
We conducted a field survey of 92 wells. The study design employed a multi-tiered approach, integrating surface flux measurements with soil gas analysis. To distinguish between deep thermogenic leakage and shallow biogenic signals, we analyzed soil gas compositions (hydrocarbons, CO2) and stable carbon isotope ratios at both, well locations and reference grids.
Statistical analysis reveals no significant differences in methane concentrations or flux rates between well locations and reference sites. Of the 92 wells examined, 20 showed at least one positive emission at the surface. Only 3 indicate time-varying and low leaking of natural gas (max 40 mg/h/well); two revealed an anomaly (possible shallow biogenic gas) and the remainder are considered natural background levels or are caused by other processes (e.g. peat mining).
The findings suggest that plugged and buried wells in Germany do not reveal systemic integrity failures and indicates that abandonment practices are effective. Further, microbial methane oxidation in the vadose zone may also serve as an efficient natural filter. While caution is warranted when upscaling these results to the >25,000 legacy wells nationwide, this study implies that these features represent a limited contribution to Germany’s methane emissions.
堵井和埋井的遗留问题:对德国甲烷排放的贡献有限
废弃油气井排放的甲烷(CH4)越来越被认为是人为温室气体清单的潜在贡献者。然而,关于德国封堵井和埋藏井的长期完整性的经验数据仍然很少。本研究旨在量化下萨克森州(德国北部)遗留井的CH4通量,以评估其环境相关性。我们对92口井进行了现场调查。研究设计采用多层方法,将地表通量测量与土壤气体分析相结合。为了区分深层热源泄漏和浅层生物源信号,我们分析了井位和参考网格的土壤气体组成(碳氢化合物、二氧化碳)和稳定碳同位素比率。统计分析显示,井位和参考地点之间的甲烷浓度或通量率没有显著差异。在调查的92口井中,有20口井地表至少有一口正排放。只有3个为时变、低泄漏天然气(最大40 mg/h/井);其中两个显示了异常(可能是浅层生物气),其余的被认为是自然背景水平或由其他过程(如泥炭开采)引起的。研究结果表明,在德国,堵井和埋井并没有显示出系统完整性的缺陷,表明弃井措施是有效的。此外,微生物甲烷氧化在气包带也可以作为一个有效的天然过滤器。当将这些结果扩大到全国25000口老井时,需要谨慎,但这项研究表明,这些特征对德国甲烷排放的贡献有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书