Geospatial allocation of biogenic CO2 supply and demand for CCUS in Finland: A scenario analysis

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Onni Linjala, Lauri Kujanpää
{"title":"Geospatial allocation of biogenic CO2 supply and demand for CCUS in Finland: A scenario analysis","authors":"Onni Linjala,&nbsp;Lauri Kujanpää","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2026.104805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the availability, infrastructure demand and supply costs of biogenic CO2 for carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) in Finland. A heuristic geospatial allocation model that aims to minimize CO2 transport demand is developed to evaluate potential CO2 supply and hub configurations under policy-based CCUS deployment scenarios. The examined large industrial facilities in Finland emit 29 Mt of biogenic CO2 annually. Due to the lack of domestic geological storage capacity and the need for CO2 shipping, the model consistently forms CCS hubs near seaports adjacent to large emission sources. Within the scenarios and system boundary examined, centralized CCU hubs can reduce investments, but the cost benefit is largely offset by increased transport demand. Seasonally variable sources have higher specific investment costs when dimensioned for peak load but excluding such sources from a hub-based CCUS system appears to yield little or no economic advantage because the hub areas expand and transport demand increases. Across the scenarios examined, the levelized cost of CO2 supply, including capture, compression and transport to CCS hub ports or utilization sites, ranges from 79 to 95 €/tCO2. With a CO2 capture volume of 14.8 Mtpa, investments in CO2 supply infrastructure range from EUR 3.5 to 5.0 billion. For CO2 utilization capacities ranging from 3.7 to 11.1 Mtpa, investments in CO2 utilization and hydrogen production infrastructure range from EUR 3.6 to 9.5 billion. The findings provide insights into CCUS infrastructure planning in regions with abundant CO2 sources but limited domestic geological storage capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104805"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583626002379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the availability, infrastructure demand and supply costs of biogenic CO2 for carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) in Finland. A heuristic geospatial allocation model that aims to minimize CO2 transport demand is developed to evaluate potential CO2 supply and hub configurations under policy-based CCUS deployment scenarios. The examined large industrial facilities in Finland emit 29 Mt of biogenic CO2 annually. Due to the lack of domestic geological storage capacity and the need for CO2 shipping, the model consistently forms CCS hubs near seaports adjacent to large emission sources. Within the scenarios and system boundary examined, centralized CCU hubs can reduce investments, but the cost benefit is largely offset by increased transport demand. Seasonally variable sources have higher specific investment costs when dimensioned for peak load but excluding such sources from a hub-based CCUS system appears to yield little or no economic advantage because the hub areas expand and transport demand increases. Across the scenarios examined, the levelized cost of CO2 supply, including capture, compression and transport to CCS hub ports or utilization sites, ranges from 79 to 95 €/tCO2. With a CO2 capture volume of 14.8 Mtpa, investments in CO2 supply infrastructure range from EUR 3.5 to 5.0 billion. For CO2 utilization capacities ranging from 3.7 to 11.1 Mtpa, investments in CO2 utilization and hydrogen production infrastructure range from EUR 3.6 to 9.5 billion. The findings provide insights into CCUS infrastructure planning in regions with abundant CO2 sources but limited domestic geological storage capacity.
芬兰CCUS生物源CO2供需的地理空间分配:情景分析
本研究考察了芬兰用于碳捕获、利用和封存(CCUS)的生物源二氧化碳的可用性、基础设施需求和供应成本。开发了一种启发式地理空间分配模型,旨在最大限度地减少二氧化碳运输需求,以评估基于策略的CCUS部署场景下潜在的二氧化碳供应和枢纽配置。被调查的芬兰大型工业设施每年排放2900万吨生物二氧化碳。由于国内缺乏地质储存能力和二氧化碳运输的需要,该模型始终在靠近大型排放源的海港附近形成CCS中心。在研究的场景和系统边界内,集中式CCU枢纽可以减少投资,但成本效益在很大程度上被增加的运输需求所抵消。当考虑峰值负荷时,季节性可变源具有更高的特定投资成本,但从基于枢纽的CCUS系统中排除此类源似乎很少或根本没有经济优势,因为枢纽区域扩大和运输需求增加。在研究的所有情景中,二氧化碳供应的平准化成本,包括捕集、压缩和运输到CCS枢纽港口或利用地点,从79欧元到95欧元/吨二氧化碳不等。二氧化碳捕集量为1480万吨/年,二氧化碳供应基础设施的投资从35亿欧元到50亿欧元不等。二氧化碳利用能力为370万至11100万吨/年,二氧化碳利用和氢气生产基础设施的投资为36亿至95亿欧元。这一发现为二氧化碳来源丰富但国内地质储存能力有限的地区的CCUS基础设施规划提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书