{"title":"Effect of acidity on flavor perception and retronasal aroma release intensity of Gewürztraminer wine paired with boiled chicken","authors":"Xue Gong, Tianlong Chen, Feng Zhao, Xinglian Xu, Xue Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2026.120012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated sensory perception and in vivo retronasal aroma release of Gewürztraminer wine subjected to three pH-adjustment treatments (pH 2.8, pH 3.3, and pH 3.8) during co-consumption with boiled chicken. Sensory evaluations and proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) were used to characterize static and temporal sensory responses and retronasal aroma-release patterns. The pH 2.8 treatment exhibited significantly higher intensities of floral (23.16%-40.88%), citrus (24.27%-45.77%), stone (28.04%-40.35%) and tropical (24.28%-42.42%) fruit aromas than the pH 3.3 and pH 3.8 treatments (<em>P</em> < 0.05), but its perceived wine body was 39.22% lower than that of the pH 3.8 treatment (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Dynamic sensory tests indicated that the pH 3.3 treatment generally showed earlier and higher pre-swallowing maxima for the principal floral and fruity attributes and received the highest overall liking score, whereas the pH 2.8 treatment showed greater cumulative aroma perception and stronger post-swallowing persistence. PTR-TOF-MS analysis further showed that overall retronasal ion-release intensity was highest in the pH 2.8 treatment. Eight ions associated with flavor differences among the pH-adjusted treatments, particularly those involving the pH 2.8 treatment, were tentatively assigned to nine candidate volatile compounds, including decanoic acid, ethyl octanoate, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,3-butanediol, citronellol, ethyl 2-hydroxypropionate, ethyl hexadecanoate, 2-phenylethyl acetate, and benzyl alcohol. Candidate chicken-associated volatile compounds may contribute to floral and fruity perception and enhance overall aroma complexity. This work provides insight into flavor responses associated with acidity adjustment during wine-food co-consumption and offers a theoretical basis for evidence-based wine-food pairing and white-wine flavor optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 120012"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643826010248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated sensory perception and in vivo retronasal aroma release of Gewürztraminer wine subjected to three pH-adjustment treatments (pH 2.8, pH 3.3, and pH 3.8) during co-consumption with boiled chicken. Sensory evaluations and proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) were used to characterize static and temporal sensory responses and retronasal aroma-release patterns. The pH 2.8 treatment exhibited significantly higher intensities of floral (23.16%-40.88%), citrus (24.27%-45.77%), stone (28.04%-40.35%) and tropical (24.28%-42.42%) fruit aromas than the pH 3.3 and pH 3.8 treatments (P < 0.05), but its perceived wine body was 39.22% lower than that of the pH 3.8 treatment (P < 0.05). Dynamic sensory tests indicated that the pH 3.3 treatment generally showed earlier and higher pre-swallowing maxima for the principal floral and fruity attributes and received the highest overall liking score, whereas the pH 2.8 treatment showed greater cumulative aroma perception and stronger post-swallowing persistence. PTR-TOF-MS analysis further showed that overall retronasal ion-release intensity was highest in the pH 2.8 treatment. Eight ions associated with flavor differences among the pH-adjusted treatments, particularly those involving the pH 2.8 treatment, were tentatively assigned to nine candidate volatile compounds, including decanoic acid, ethyl octanoate, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,3-butanediol, citronellol, ethyl 2-hydroxypropionate, ethyl hexadecanoate, 2-phenylethyl acetate, and benzyl alcohol. Candidate chicken-associated volatile compounds may contribute to floral and fruity perception and enhance overall aroma complexity. This work provides insight into flavor responses associated with acidity adjustment during wine-food co-consumption and offers a theoretical basis for evidence-based wine-food pairing and white-wine flavor optimization.
期刊介绍:
LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.