Effect of acidity on flavor perception and retronasal aroma release intensity of Gewürztraminer wine paired with boiled chicken

IF 7.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
LWT - Food Science and Technology Pub Date : 2026-10-15 Epub Date: 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2026.120012
Xue Gong, Tianlong Chen, Feng Zhao, Xinglian Xu, Xue Zhao
{"title":"Effect of acidity on flavor perception and retronasal aroma release intensity of Gewürztraminer wine paired with boiled chicken","authors":"Xue Gong,&nbsp;Tianlong Chen,&nbsp;Feng Zhao,&nbsp;Xinglian Xu,&nbsp;Xue Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2026.120012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated sensory perception and in vivo retronasal aroma release of Gewürztraminer wine subjected to three pH-adjustment treatments (pH 2.8, pH 3.3, and pH 3.8) during co-consumption with boiled chicken. Sensory evaluations and proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) were used to characterize static and temporal sensory responses and retronasal aroma-release patterns. The pH 2.8 treatment exhibited significantly higher intensities of floral (23.16%-40.88%), citrus (24.27%-45.77%), stone (28.04%-40.35%) and tropical (24.28%-42.42%) fruit aromas than the pH 3.3 and pH 3.8 treatments (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), but its perceived wine body was 39.22% lower than that of the pH 3.8 treatment (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Dynamic sensory tests indicated that the pH 3.3 treatment generally showed earlier and higher pre-swallowing maxima for the principal floral and fruity attributes and received the highest overall liking score, whereas the pH 2.8 treatment showed greater cumulative aroma perception and stronger post-swallowing persistence. PTR-TOF-MS analysis further showed that overall retronasal ion-release intensity was highest in the pH 2.8 treatment. Eight ions associated with flavor differences among the pH-adjusted treatments, particularly those involving the pH 2.8 treatment, were tentatively assigned to nine candidate volatile compounds, including decanoic acid, ethyl octanoate, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,3-butanediol, citronellol, ethyl 2-hydroxypropionate, ethyl hexadecanoate, 2-phenylethyl acetate, and benzyl alcohol. Candidate chicken-associated volatile compounds may contribute to floral and fruity perception and enhance overall aroma complexity. This work provides insight into flavor responses associated with acidity adjustment during wine-food co-consumption and offers a theoretical basis for evidence-based wine-food pairing and white-wine flavor optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 120012"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643826010248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated sensory perception and in vivo retronasal aroma release of Gewürztraminer wine subjected to three pH-adjustment treatments (pH 2.8, pH 3.3, and pH 3.8) during co-consumption with boiled chicken. Sensory evaluations and proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) were used to characterize static and temporal sensory responses and retronasal aroma-release patterns. The pH 2.8 treatment exhibited significantly higher intensities of floral (23.16%-40.88%), citrus (24.27%-45.77%), stone (28.04%-40.35%) and tropical (24.28%-42.42%) fruit aromas than the pH 3.3 and pH 3.8 treatments (P < 0.05), but its perceived wine body was 39.22% lower than that of the pH 3.8 treatment (P < 0.05). Dynamic sensory tests indicated that the pH 3.3 treatment generally showed earlier and higher pre-swallowing maxima for the principal floral and fruity attributes and received the highest overall liking score, whereas the pH 2.8 treatment showed greater cumulative aroma perception and stronger post-swallowing persistence. PTR-TOF-MS analysis further showed that overall retronasal ion-release intensity was highest in the pH 2.8 treatment. Eight ions associated with flavor differences among the pH-adjusted treatments, particularly those involving the pH 2.8 treatment, were tentatively assigned to nine candidate volatile compounds, including decanoic acid, ethyl octanoate, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,3-butanediol, citronellol, ethyl 2-hydroxypropionate, ethyl hexadecanoate, 2-phenylethyl acetate, and benzyl alcohol. Candidate chicken-associated volatile compounds may contribute to floral and fruity perception and enhance overall aroma complexity. This work provides insight into flavor responses associated with acidity adjustment during wine-food co-consumption and offers a theoretical basis for evidence-based wine-food pairing and white-wine flavor optimization.
酸度对geww酒与水煮鸡配餐风味感知及鼻后香气释放强度的影响
本研究研究了三种pH调节处理(pH 2.8、pH 3.3和pH 3.8)下的geww rztraminer葡萄酒与水煮鸡共饮时的感官知觉和体内后鼻香气释放。感官评价和质子转移反应飞行时间质谱(PTR-TOF-MS)用于表征静态和时间感觉反应和鼻后香气释放模式。与pH 3.3和pH 3.8处理相比,pH 2.8处理的花(23.16% ~ 40.88%)、柑橘(24.27% ~ 45.77%)、石核(28.04% ~ 40.35%)和热带水果(24.28% ~ 42.42%)香气强度显著提高(P <; 0.05),但感知到的酒体比pH 3.8处理低39.22% (P <; 0.05)。动态感官测试表明,pH 3.3处理总体上表现出更早、更高的主要花香和水果属性的预吞最大值,总体喜欢得分最高,而pH 2.8处理则表现出更大的累积香气感知和更强的吞咽后持久性。PTR-TOF-MS分析进一步表明,pH为2.8时,总后鼻离子释放强度最高。8个离子与不同pH值处理(尤其是pH值为2.8的处理)的风味差异有关,并被初步确定为9种候选挥发性化合物,包括癸酸、辛酸乙酯、2,4-二叔丁基苯酚、2,3-丁二醇、香茅醇、2-羟丙酸乙酯、十六酸乙酯、2-苯乙酸乙酯和苯甲醇。候选的与鸡有关的挥发性化合物可能有助于花香和水果的感觉,并提高整体香气的复杂性。本研究揭示了酒食共食过程中酸度调节对风味的影响,为基于证据的酒食搭配和白葡萄酒风味优化提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT - Food Science and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1724
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书