Experimental comparison of MPCM slurry and conductive particle suspensions for enhanced heat transport in solar thermal systems

IF 7.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Applied Thermal Engineering Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-22 DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.133320
Hee Jun Jeong, Su Woong Hyun, Jae Hyuk Kim, Dong Ho Shin
{"title":"Experimental comparison of MPCM slurry and conductive particle suspensions for enhanced heat transport in solar thermal systems","authors":"Hee Jun Jeong,&nbsp;Su Woong Hyun,&nbsp;Jae Hyuk Kim,&nbsp;Dong Ho Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.133320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Solar thermal collectors require heat transfer fluids that combine high thermal transport and storage capacity with dispersion stability and acceptable hydraulic performance. In this study, microencapsulated phase change material slurry (MPCS), expanded graphite (EG) and copper (Cu) suspensions, and EG enhanced MPCS were experimentally compared in the same closed loop solar thermal system under equivalent operating conditions. Heat transport, convective heat transfer, dispersion stability, hydraulic performance, and costs were evaluated to distinguish latent heat storage from conductive enhancement. The settling velocities of MPCM, EG, and Cu were 0.007, 0.130, and 1.160 mm/s, respectively, demonstrating the superior dispersion stability of MPCM. The 30 vol% MPCS exhibited a latent heat capacity of 46.2 kJ/kg and a total specific thermal storage capacity of 133.7 kJ/kg over 25–50 °C, approximately 28.3% higher than that of water, with latent heat accounting for approximately 34.6% of the total specific storage capacity. Increasing the flow rate from 1 to 8 L/min increased the average Nusselt number from approximately 7.5 to 37 and the heat transport rate from 81.2 to 400.5 kJ/h. The hydraulic heat transport index (HHTI) was introduced to quantify the balance between useful heat transport and pumping demand, identifying 4–5 L/min as a practical operating range. EG exhibited better thermal hydraulic performance than Cu because of its lower settling tendency and hydraulic penalty. Adding 1.0 vol% EG to 30 vol% MPCS increased heat transport from 335.7 to 380.0 kJ/h and HHTI from 0.78 to 0.88. These results provide a common experimental basis for comparing latent storage and conductive enhancement and demonstrate the potential of combining both mechanisms while accounting for dispersion stability and hydraulic resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8201,"journal":{"name":"Applied Thermal Engineering","volume":"307 ","pages":"Article 133320"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431126036288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solar thermal collectors require heat transfer fluids that combine high thermal transport and storage capacity with dispersion stability and acceptable hydraulic performance. In this study, microencapsulated phase change material slurry (MPCS), expanded graphite (EG) and copper (Cu) suspensions, and EG enhanced MPCS were experimentally compared in the same closed loop solar thermal system under equivalent operating conditions. Heat transport, convective heat transfer, dispersion stability, hydraulic performance, and costs were evaluated to distinguish latent heat storage from conductive enhancement. The settling velocities of MPCM, EG, and Cu were 0.007, 0.130, and 1.160 mm/s, respectively, demonstrating the superior dispersion stability of MPCM. The 30 vol% MPCS exhibited a latent heat capacity of 46.2 kJ/kg and a total specific thermal storage capacity of 133.7 kJ/kg over 25–50 °C, approximately 28.3% higher than that of water, with latent heat accounting for approximately 34.6% of the total specific storage capacity. Increasing the flow rate from 1 to 8 L/min increased the average Nusselt number from approximately 7.5 to 37 and the heat transport rate from 81.2 to 400.5 kJ/h. The hydraulic heat transport index (HHTI) was introduced to quantify the balance between useful heat transport and pumping demand, identifying 4–5 L/min as a practical operating range. EG exhibited better thermal hydraulic performance than Cu because of its lower settling tendency and hydraulic penalty. Adding 1.0 vol% EG to 30 vol% MPCS increased heat transport from 335.7 to 380.0 kJ/h and HHTI from 0.78 to 0.88. These results provide a common experimental basis for comparing latent storage and conductive enhancement and demonstrate the potential of combining both mechanisms while accounting for dispersion stability and hydraulic resistance.
MPCM浆液与导电颗粒悬浮液在太阳能热系统中增强热传递的实验比较
太阳能集热器要求传热流体结合高热传输和存储能力,分散稳定性和可接受的水力性能。在相同的闭环太阳能热系统中,实验比较了微胶囊化相变材料浆料(MPCS)、膨胀石墨(EG)和铜(Cu)悬浮液以及EG增强的微胶囊化相变材料浆料(MPCS)在等效工况下的性能。热传输、对流传热、分散稳定性、水力性能和成本进行了评估,以区分潜热储存和传导增强。MPCM、EG和Cu的沉降速度分别为0.007、0.130和1.160 mm/s,表明MPCM具有良好的分散稳定性。在25-50°C范围内,30 vol% MPCS的潜热容量为46.2 kJ/kg,总比热存储量为133.7 kJ/kg,比水的潜热存储量高28.3%,潜热占总比热存储量的34.6%。当流量从1 L/min增加到8 L/min时,平均努塞尔数从7.5增加到37,传热速率从81.2增加到4000.5 kJ/h。引入水力热传递指数(HHTI)来量化有效热传递与抽水需求之间的平衡,确定4-5 L/min为实际操作范围。EG具有较低的沉降倾向和水力损失,表现出较好的热水力性能。在30 vol%的MPCS中加入1.0 vol%的EG,使热传递量从335.7增加到380.0 kJ/h, HHTI从0.78增加到0.88。这些结果为比较潜伏储存和导电增强提供了共同的实验基础,并证明了在考虑分散稳定性和水力阻力的情况下将这两种机制结合起来的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Thermal Engineering
Applied Thermal Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1474
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Applied Thermal Engineering disseminates novel research related to the design, development and demonstration of components, devices, equipment, technologies and systems involving thermal processes for the production, storage, utilization and conservation of energy, with a focus on engineering application. The journal publishes high-quality and high-impact Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor on cutting-edge innovations in research, and recent advances or issues of interest to the thermal engineering community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书