Narrative identity, mental illness, and recovery: A systematic review across diagnoses

IF 11.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Dorthe Kirkegaard Thomsen, Anne Mai Pedersen, Jonathan M. Adler, Rikke Amalie Agergaard Jensen, Majse Lind
{"title":"Narrative identity, mental illness, and recovery: A systematic review across diagnoses","authors":"Dorthe Kirkegaard Thomsen, Anne Mai Pedersen, Jonathan M. Adler, Rikke Amalie Agergaard Jensen, Majse Lind","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individuals across a range of mental illnesses struggle with identity problems. These problems are important to investigate because they may represent vulnerability to mental illness, emerge as consequences of psychopathology, and pose barriers to recovery. The narrative identity approach is especially suited to illuminate identity problems because it combines a first-person perspective with systematic quantitative studies and provides a strong theoretical foundation for recovery-oriented care. We present a pre-registered systematic review across diagnoses to examine 1) how mental illness is associated with narrative identity and 2) whether narrative identity is related to recovery. After screening 2,327 abstracts, we identified 75 relevant papers. The studies sampled individuals with a range of diagnoses and employed a multitude of narrative identity and recovery measures. Our synthesis suggests that across the examined mental illnesses, narrative identity is less coherent and with adversely affected meaning-making and self-event connections as well as more negatively emotionally toned with lower agency and lower communion themes. The evidence was most robust for schizophrenia, which was more often studied. Regarding relations between narrative identity and recovery, we could not detect consistent patterns, likely due to the complex pairing of multiple narrative identity and recovery measures combined with small sample sizes. Future research could examine a broader array of mental illnesses with respect to transdiagnostic and disorder-specific narrative identity problems and prioritize well-powered, prospective and carefully controlled studies to gain a deeper understanding of the sources of narrative identity problems and the predictive power of narrative identity in relation to recovery.","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals across a range of mental illnesses struggle with identity problems. These problems are important to investigate because they may represent vulnerability to mental illness, emerge as consequences of psychopathology, and pose barriers to recovery. The narrative identity approach is especially suited to illuminate identity problems because it combines a first-person perspective with systematic quantitative studies and provides a strong theoretical foundation for recovery-oriented care. We present a pre-registered systematic review across diagnoses to examine 1) how mental illness is associated with narrative identity and 2) whether narrative identity is related to recovery. After screening 2,327 abstracts, we identified 75 relevant papers. The studies sampled individuals with a range of diagnoses and employed a multitude of narrative identity and recovery measures. Our synthesis suggests that across the examined mental illnesses, narrative identity is less coherent and with adversely affected meaning-making and self-event connections as well as more negatively emotionally toned with lower agency and lower communion themes. The evidence was most robust for schizophrenia, which was more often studied. Regarding relations between narrative identity and recovery, we could not detect consistent patterns, likely due to the complex pairing of multiple narrative identity and recovery measures combined with small sample sizes. Future research could examine a broader array of mental illnesses with respect to transdiagnostic and disorder-specific narrative identity problems and prioritize well-powered, prospective and carefully controlled studies to gain a deeper understanding of the sources of narrative identity problems and the predictive power of narrative identity in relation to recovery.
叙述性身份,精神疾病和康复:跨诊断的系统回顾
患有一系列精神疾病的人都在与身份问题作斗争。调查这些问题很重要,因为它们可能代表易患精神疾病,作为精神病理学的后果出现,并对康复构成障碍。叙事身份方法特别适合阐释身份问题,因为它将第一人称视角与系统的定量研究相结合,为康复导向的护理提供了强有力的理论基础。我们提出了一项预先注册的系统综述,旨在研究1)精神疾病与叙事认同之间的关系,以及2)叙事认同是否与康复有关。在筛选了2327篇摘要后,我们确定了75篇相关论文。这些研究抽样了一系列诊断的个体,并采用了大量的叙事身份和恢复措施。我们的综合研究表明,在所研究的精神疾病中,叙述性身份不太连贯,对意义制造和自我事件联系产生不利影响,并且在较低的代理和较低的交流主题中,情绪上更消极。证据最有力的是精神分裂症,它更常被研究。关于叙事认同和恢复之间的关系,我们无法发现一致的模式,可能是由于多种叙事认同和恢复措施的复杂配对以及小样本量。未来的研究可以研究更广泛的精神疾病,包括跨诊断和特定障碍的叙事认同问题,并优先考虑有力的、前瞻性的和精心控制的研究,以更深入地了解叙事认同问题的来源,以及叙事认同与康复的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书