Current Strengths and Limitations of Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic (TKTD) Models for Freshwater Microalgae

IF 12.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
环境科学与技术 Pub Date : 2026-10-20 Epub Date: 2026-10-07 DOI:10.1021/acs.est.6c05753
Emma Yenney, Nina Cedergreen
{"title":"Current Strengths and Limitations of Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic (TKTD) Models for Freshwater Microalgae","authors":"Emma Yenney,&nbsp;Nina Cedergreen","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.6c05753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic\r\n(TKTD) models are increasingly\r\nused\r\nto enhance environmental risk assessment by linking laboratory toxicity\r\ndata with dynamic exposure scenarios. For freshwater microalgae, which\r\nare crucial primary producers, TKTD approaches offer a framework to\r\npredict population growth inhibition and recovery under fluctuating\r\nchemical stress. A review of 12 studies (2012–2023) applying\r\nTKTD models to freshwater planktonic microalgae was conducted to compare\r\ntheir structural assumptions, end points, and validation methods.\r\nThese models mainly focus on green algae and herbicides that inhibit\r\nphotosystem II, with limited exploration of other taxonomic groups\r\nor modes of action. The complexity of models varies significantly,\r\nfrom simple structures assuming rapid equilibrium between external\r\nand internal chemical concentrations to mechanistic models that explicitly\r\nincorporate TK components and damage progression. While simple models\r\nsupport regulatory use, omitting TK processes can reduce their effectiveness\r\nfor chemicals with delayed effects or complex uptake behaviors. Expanding\r\ntaxonomic coverage and enhancing external validation under realistic\r\nexposure conditions is crucial to increasing the ecological relevance\r\nof algal TKTD modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"60 41","pages":"29229–29244"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6c05753","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) models are increasingly used to enhance environmental risk assessment by linking laboratory toxicity data with dynamic exposure scenarios. For freshwater microalgae, which are crucial primary producers, TKTD approaches offer a framework to predict population growth inhibition and recovery under fluctuating chemical stress. A review of 12 studies (2012–2023) applying TKTD models to freshwater planktonic microalgae was conducted to compare their structural assumptions, end points, and validation methods. These models mainly focus on green algae and herbicides that inhibit photosystem II, with limited exploration of other taxonomic groups or modes of action. The complexity of models varies significantly, from simple structures assuming rapid equilibrium between external and internal chemical concentrations to mechanistic models that explicitly incorporate TK components and damage progression. While simple models support regulatory use, omitting TK processes can reduce their effectiveness for chemicals with delayed effects or complex uptake behaviors. Expanding taxonomic coverage and enhancing external validation under realistic exposure conditions is crucial to increasing the ecological relevance of algal TKTD modeling.

淡水微藻毒物动力学(TKTD)模型的现状、优势和局限性
毒物动力学(TKTD)模型通过将实验室毒性数据与动态暴露情景联系起来,越来越多地用于加强环境风险评估。淡水微藻是重要的初级生产者,TKTD方法为预测波动化学胁迫下种群生长抑制和恢复提供了一个框架。对2012-2023年12项淡水浮游微藻应用TKTD模型的研究进行了综述,比较了它们的结构假设、终点和验证方法。这些模型主要集中在抑制光系统II的绿藻和除草剂上,对其他分类群或作用方式的探索有限。模型的复杂性差异很大,从简单的结构假设外部和内部化学浓度之间的快速平衡到明确包含TK成分和损伤进展的机制模型。虽然简单的模型支持监管使用,但忽略TK过程可能会降低其对具有延迟效应或复杂摄取行为的化学品的有效性。扩大分类覆盖范围和增强现实暴露条件下的外部验证对于提高藻类TKTD建模的生态相关性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书