Endotypic Traits of Hypopnea-Predominant OSA: The Role of Hypopnea Criteria.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shinn-Jye Liang, Liang-Wen Hang, Chun-Sen Huang, Eysteinn Finnsson, Jón S Ágústsson, Scott A Sands, Wan-Ju Cheng
{"title":"Endotypic Traits of Hypopnea-Predominant OSA: The Role of Hypopnea Criteria.","authors":"Shinn-Jye Liang, Liang-Wen Hang, Chun-Sen Huang, Eysteinn Finnsson, Jón S Ágústsson, Scott A Sands, Wan-Ju Cheng","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypopnea-predominant OSA (HypoOSA) represents a distinct phenotype compared to apnea-predominant OSA. Nevertheless, hypopnea has been defined using varying criteria, leading to differences in the estimation of AHI. This study investigated the endotypic traits of HypoOSA, as defined by ≥ 4% desaturation (4% OD) and ≥ 3% desaturation or arousal (3% ODA) criteria for hypopnea and how AHI and endotypic traits differ by criteria. We prospectively enrolled 765 adult patients with moderate-to-severe OSA from a single sleep centre. Endotypic traits were obtained from in-laboratory polysomnographic studies. Respiratory events were scored twice using 3% ODA and 4% OD criteria. Endotypic traits characterizing HypoOSA, defined as AHI comprising < 50% apneas, were identified and compared to apnea-predominant OSA. Within-subject differences in endotypic traits between the hypopnea criteria were analysed. We observed that 4% OD and 3% ODA identified 40.3% and 57.0% patients as HypoOSA, respectively. Compared to apnea-predominant OSA, HypoOSA was characterized by a lower arousal threshold, higher compensation and less collapsible upper airway, regardless of hypopnea criteria used. Compared with the 4% OD criterion, the 3% ODA criterion for hypopnea increased AHI by 33%, whereas the proportion of time with SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90% and endotypic traits showed less variation. Patients with low consistency in AHI estimates between the two criteria showed lower AHI and favourable upper airway pathology compared to the high consistency group. In conclusion, HypoOSA is characterized by lower arousal threshold and favourable upper airway patency. Different hypopnea criteria resulted in variation in AHI, particularly among patients with lower AHI, whereas hypoxic burden and endotypic traits remained relatively stable.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70472"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypopnea-predominant OSA (HypoOSA) represents a distinct phenotype compared to apnea-predominant OSA. Nevertheless, hypopnea has been defined using varying criteria, leading to differences in the estimation of AHI. This study investigated the endotypic traits of HypoOSA, as defined by ≥ 4% desaturation (4% OD) and ≥ 3% desaturation or arousal (3% ODA) criteria for hypopnea and how AHI and endotypic traits differ by criteria. We prospectively enrolled 765 adult patients with moderate-to-severe OSA from a single sleep centre. Endotypic traits were obtained from in-laboratory polysomnographic studies. Respiratory events were scored twice using 3% ODA and 4% OD criteria. Endotypic traits characterizing HypoOSA, defined as AHI comprising < 50% apneas, were identified and compared to apnea-predominant OSA. Within-subject differences in endotypic traits between the hypopnea criteria were analysed. We observed that 4% OD and 3% ODA identified 40.3% and 57.0% patients as HypoOSA, respectively. Compared to apnea-predominant OSA, HypoOSA was characterized by a lower arousal threshold, higher compensation and less collapsible upper airway, regardless of hypopnea criteria used. Compared with the 4% OD criterion, the 3% ODA criterion for hypopnea increased AHI by 33%, whereas the proportion of time with SpO2 < 90% and endotypic traits showed less variation. Patients with low consistency in AHI estimates between the two criteria showed lower AHI and favourable upper airway pathology compared to the high consistency group. In conclusion, HypoOSA is characterized by lower arousal threshold and favourable upper airway patency. Different hypopnea criteria resulted in variation in AHI, particularly among patients with lower AHI, whereas hypoxic burden and endotypic traits remained relatively stable.

低呼吸显性OSA的内源性特征:低呼吸标准的作用。
低呼吸优势型OSA (HypoOSA)与呼吸优势型OSA相比表现出不同的表型。然而,低通气的定义标准不同,导致对AHI的估计存在差异。本研究探讨了HypoOSA的内型特征,即低通气的≥4%去饱和(4% OD)和≥3%去饱和或觉醒(3% ODA)标准,以及AHI和内型特征在不同标准下的差异。我们前瞻性地从一个睡眠中心招募了765名患有中度至重度OSA的成年患者。内型特征是通过实验室多导睡眠图研究获得的。使用3% ODA和4% OD标准对呼吸事件进行两次评分。表征HypoOSA的内型特征,定义为AHI包含2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书