Dennis Rivera-Cash, Alo Rodriguez, Ankshita Dasgupta, Juan Rivera, Aniruddha Hazra, Jade Pagkas-Bather, Jose I Gutierrez, Moira C McNulty, Maria Pyra
{"title":"Perceptions of DoxyPEP use Among Racial & Ethnic Minority Patients.","authors":"Dennis Rivera-Cash, Alo Rodriguez, Ankshita Dasgupta, Juan Rivera, Aniruddha Hazra, Jade Pagkas-Bather, Jose I Gutierrez, Moira C McNulty, Maria Pyra","doi":"10.1007/s40615-026-03062-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To maximize the impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) in controlling the bacterial STI epidemic, understanding of the barriers to delivering doxyPEP to the most vulnerable populations is essential. Guided by the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior) framework, we interviewed 26 racial and ethnically diverse participants eligible for doxyPEP to identify barriers and facilitators to doxyPEP use. Participants reported facilitators such as: knowledge; positive clinical encounters; community normalization; and beliefs regarding efficacy, peer attitudes and motivations around doxyPEP. Barriers included confusion with HIV PrEP and a need for more knowledge; access to healthcare or negative experiences with healthcare; limited community awareness and concerns around disclosure. However, participants also described potential solutions, including specific knowledge needed, low barrier and non-judgmental healthcare, home STI testing, and increased community awareness and normalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-026-03062-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To maximize the impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) in controlling the bacterial STI epidemic, understanding of the barriers to delivering doxyPEP to the most vulnerable populations is essential. Guided by the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior) framework, we interviewed 26 racial and ethnically diverse participants eligible for doxyPEP to identify barriers and facilitators to doxyPEP use. Participants reported facilitators such as: knowledge; positive clinical encounters; community normalization; and beliefs regarding efficacy, peer attitudes and motivations around doxyPEP. Barriers included confusion with HIV PrEP and a need for more knowledge; access to healthcare or negative experiences with healthcare; limited community awareness and concerns around disclosure. However, participants also described potential solutions, including specific knowledge needed, low barrier and non-judgmental healthcare, home STI testing, and increased community awareness and normalization.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.