Corridors increase ant diversity over time.

IF 4.3
Ecology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70527
Melissa A Burt, Susan R Whitehead, Julian Resasco
{"title":"Corridors increase ant diversity over time.","authors":"Melissa A Burt, Susan R Whitehead, Julian Resasco","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, habitat loss and fragmentation pose significant threats to biodiversity. Habitat corridors are often used in fragmented landscapes to reconnect isolated patches. However, understanding how corridors function can be challenging, as their effects may be confounded with simultaneous changes to habitat area, edge amount, and connectivity among patches. Here, we used a long-term, landscape scale experiment to investigate two potential mechanisms by which corridors may influence biodiversity-via increasing habitat connectivity or through increasing the amount of edge. With pitfall trap sampling conducted over 5 years (9-15 years since site establishment), we assessed the relative effects of connectivity and edge effects by measuring ant biodiversity in four ways: (1) taxonomic diversity, (2) functional diversity, (3) community composition, and (4) site-to-site variance in community composition (i.e., beta diversity). We found evidence of both connectivity and edge effects on ant diversity and community composition. Taxonomic diversity increased linearly in all patch types over time, yet accumulated more quickly in connected than in isolated patches. The faster accumulation of taxonomic diversity in connected patches was associated with greater site-to-site variance in community composition. Although we found no differences in mean taxonomic diversity within patches (alpha diversity), the faster accumulation of taxonomic diversity and greater beta diversity among patches with corridors suggests that ant diversity in connected patches may eventually surpass that of isolated patch types. Finally, while we found no effect of edge amount for how fast taxonomic diversity accumulated over time, functional group diversity accumulated more quickly in winged patches that have more edge habitat relative to interior habitat than rectangular patches. Taken together, these results add to a body of literature that shows the potential for habitat corridors to have positive effects on biodiversity by increasing connectivity and that these effects may continue to accrue over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":93986,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 10","pages":"e70527"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13653127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, habitat loss and fragmentation pose significant threats to biodiversity. Habitat corridors are often used in fragmented landscapes to reconnect isolated patches. However, understanding how corridors function can be challenging, as their effects may be confounded with simultaneous changes to habitat area, edge amount, and connectivity among patches. Here, we used a long-term, landscape scale experiment to investigate two potential mechanisms by which corridors may influence biodiversity-via increasing habitat connectivity or through increasing the amount of edge. With pitfall trap sampling conducted over 5 years (9-15 years since site establishment), we assessed the relative effects of connectivity and edge effects by measuring ant biodiversity in four ways: (1) taxonomic diversity, (2) functional diversity, (3) community composition, and (4) site-to-site variance in community composition (i.e., beta diversity). We found evidence of both connectivity and edge effects on ant diversity and community composition. Taxonomic diversity increased linearly in all patch types over time, yet accumulated more quickly in connected than in isolated patches. The faster accumulation of taxonomic diversity in connected patches was associated with greater site-to-site variance in community composition. Although we found no differences in mean taxonomic diversity within patches (alpha diversity), the faster accumulation of taxonomic diversity and greater beta diversity among patches with corridors suggests that ant diversity in connected patches may eventually surpass that of isolated patch types. Finally, while we found no effect of edge amount for how fast taxonomic diversity accumulated over time, functional group diversity accumulated more quickly in winged patches that have more edge habitat relative to interior habitat than rectangular patches. Taken together, these results add to a body of literature that shows the potential for habitat corridors to have positive effects on biodiversity by increasing connectivity and that these effects may continue to accrue over time.

随着时间的推移,走廊增加了蚂蚁的多样性。
在全球范围内,栖息地丧失和破碎化对生物多样性构成重大威胁。栖息地走廊通常用于破碎的景观,以重新连接孤立的斑块。然而,了解廊道的功能是具有挑战性的,因为它们的影响可能与栖息地面积、边缘数量和斑块之间的连通性的同时变化相混淆。在这里,我们使用了一个长期的、景观尺度的实验来研究走廊影响生物多样性的两种潜在机制——通过增加栖息地的连通性或通过增加边缘的数量。通过5年(自建站以来9-15年)的陷阱取样,我们从4个方面评估了蚂蚁生物多样性:(1)分类多样性,(2)功能多样性,(3)群落组成,(4)群落组成的点间差异(即beta多样性)。我们发现了连通性和边缘效应对蚂蚁多样性和群落组成的影响。随着时间的推移,所有斑块类型的分类多样性呈线性增长,但连接斑块的积累速度比孤立斑块快。在连通斑块中,群落多样性积累速度越快,群落组成的点间差异越大。虽然斑块内的平均分类多样性(α多样性)没有差异,但具有廊道的斑块间分类多样性积累较快,β多样性更大,表明连接斑块的蚂蚁多样性最终可能超过孤立斑块类型。最后,虽然边缘数量对分类多样性随时间积累的快慢没有影响,但相对于矩形斑块,边缘生境较多的翅状斑块功能群多样性积累速度更快。综上所述,这些结果增加了大量文献,表明栖息地走廊通过增加连通性对生物多样性产生积极影响的潜力,并且这些影响可能会随着时间的推移而持续积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书