Travis Haber, Kim L Bennell, Rana S Hinman, Siyi Zhu, Rachel K Nelligan
{"title":"Implementing exercise therapy for hip and knee osteoarthritis in the clinic: a best practice narrative review.","authors":"Travis Haber, Kim L Bennell, Rana S Hinman, Siyi Zhu, Rachel K Nelligan","doi":"10.1016/j.berh.2026.102205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major guidelines recommend exercise for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), yet few provide guidance on how to prescribe it. This narrative review synthesizes high-quality and clinically relevant evidence on exercise therapy for hip or knee OA, prioritizing systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Findings were summarized across nine topics, with a focus on translating the evidence into specific guidance for clinicians. Clinicians should consider measuring pain, physical function, quality of life, and global assessment for most patients with hip or knee OA. When educating about OA, clinicians should focus on what patients can do and avoid impairment-based language. Exercise therapy is safe and provides small to moderate improvements in pain and function, although effects appear smaller for hip OA than for knee OA. No exercise type has proven superior, nor has a dose-response relationship been established. Patients with higher baseline pain and poorer function may benefit somewhat more, but effects differ little across other patient characteristics, including comorbidity burden and radiographic severity. Whether increasing adherence leads to greater improvements in pain and function remains unclear, but helping patients start and sustain exercise remains a priority, given its wide-ranging health benefits. In-person, telehealth, and self-directed delivery can all improve pain and function, and they appear to offer benefits of similar magnitude. Overall, exercise is safe, with the most common adverse event being temporary muscle or joint soreness. Clinicians do not need to search for an optimal program but can instead build one around the patient's priorities, preferences, and needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50983,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research in Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"102205"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research in Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2026.102205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Major guidelines recommend exercise for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), yet few provide guidance on how to prescribe it. This narrative review synthesizes high-quality and clinically relevant evidence on exercise therapy for hip or knee OA, prioritizing systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Findings were summarized across nine topics, with a focus on translating the evidence into specific guidance for clinicians. Clinicians should consider measuring pain, physical function, quality of life, and global assessment for most patients with hip or knee OA. When educating about OA, clinicians should focus on what patients can do and avoid impairment-based language. Exercise therapy is safe and provides small to moderate improvements in pain and function, although effects appear smaller for hip OA than for knee OA. No exercise type has proven superior, nor has a dose-response relationship been established. Patients with higher baseline pain and poorer function may benefit somewhat more, but effects differ little across other patient characteristics, including comorbidity burden and radiographic severity. Whether increasing adherence leads to greater improvements in pain and function remains unclear, but helping patients start and sustain exercise remains a priority, given its wide-ranging health benefits. In-person, telehealth, and self-directed delivery can all improve pain and function, and they appear to offer benefits of similar magnitude. Overall, exercise is safe, with the most common adverse event being temporary muscle or joint soreness. Clinicians do not need to search for an optimal program but can instead build one around the patient's priorities, preferences, and needs.
期刊介绍:
Evidence-based updates of best clinical practice across the spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions.
Best Practice & Research: Clinical Rheumatology keeps the clinician or trainee informed of the latest developments and current recommended practice in the rapidly advancing fields of musculoskeletal conditions and science.
The series provides a continuous update of current clinical practice. It is a topical serial publication that covers the spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions in a 4-year cycle. Each topic-based issue contains around 200 pages of practical, evidence-based review articles, which integrate the results from the latest original research with current clinical practice and thinking to provide a continuous update.
Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. The review articles seek to address the clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Management is described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient. The serial is aimed at the physician in both practice and training.