Implementing exercise therapy for hip and knee osteoarthritis in the clinic: a best practice narrative review.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Travis Haber, Kim L Bennell, Rana S Hinman, Siyi Zhu, Rachel K Nelligan
{"title":"Implementing exercise therapy for hip and knee osteoarthritis in the clinic: a best practice narrative review.","authors":"Travis Haber, Kim L Bennell, Rana S Hinman, Siyi Zhu, Rachel K Nelligan","doi":"10.1016/j.berh.2026.102205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major guidelines recommend exercise for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), yet few provide guidance on how to prescribe it. This narrative review synthesizes high-quality and clinically relevant evidence on exercise therapy for hip or knee OA, prioritizing systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Findings were summarized across nine topics, with a focus on translating the evidence into specific guidance for clinicians. Clinicians should consider measuring pain, physical function, quality of life, and global assessment for most patients with hip or knee OA. When educating about OA, clinicians should focus on what patients can do and avoid impairment-based language. Exercise therapy is safe and provides small to moderate improvements in pain and function, although effects appear smaller for hip OA than for knee OA. No exercise type has proven superior, nor has a dose-response relationship been established. Patients with higher baseline pain and poorer function may benefit somewhat more, but effects differ little across other patient characteristics, including comorbidity burden and radiographic severity. Whether increasing adherence leads to greater improvements in pain and function remains unclear, but helping patients start and sustain exercise remains a priority, given its wide-ranging health benefits. In-person, telehealth, and self-directed delivery can all improve pain and function, and they appear to offer benefits of similar magnitude. Overall, exercise is safe, with the most common adverse event being temporary muscle or joint soreness. Clinicians do not need to search for an optimal program but can instead build one around the patient's priorities, preferences, and needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50983,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research in Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"102205"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research in Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2026.102205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major guidelines recommend exercise for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), yet few provide guidance on how to prescribe it. This narrative review synthesizes high-quality and clinically relevant evidence on exercise therapy for hip or knee OA, prioritizing systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Findings were summarized across nine topics, with a focus on translating the evidence into specific guidance for clinicians. Clinicians should consider measuring pain, physical function, quality of life, and global assessment for most patients with hip or knee OA. When educating about OA, clinicians should focus on what patients can do and avoid impairment-based language. Exercise therapy is safe and provides small to moderate improvements in pain and function, although effects appear smaller for hip OA than for knee OA. No exercise type has proven superior, nor has a dose-response relationship been established. Patients with higher baseline pain and poorer function may benefit somewhat more, but effects differ little across other patient characteristics, including comorbidity burden and radiographic severity. Whether increasing adherence leads to greater improvements in pain and function remains unclear, but helping patients start and sustain exercise remains a priority, given its wide-ranging health benefits. In-person, telehealth, and self-directed delivery can all improve pain and function, and they appear to offer benefits of similar magnitude. Overall, exercise is safe, with the most common adverse event being temporary muscle or joint soreness. Clinicians do not need to search for an optimal program but can instead build one around the patient's priorities, preferences, and needs.

在临床实施运动治疗髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎:最佳实践叙述回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Evidence-based updates of best clinical practice across the spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Rheumatology keeps the clinician or trainee informed of the latest developments and current recommended practice in the rapidly advancing fields of musculoskeletal conditions and science. The series provides a continuous update of current clinical practice. It is a topical serial publication that covers the spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions in a 4-year cycle. Each topic-based issue contains around 200 pages of practical, evidence-based review articles, which integrate the results from the latest original research with current clinical practice and thinking to provide a continuous update. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. The review articles seek to address the clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Management is described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient. The serial is aimed at the physician in both practice and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书