Fiber Retention Osseous Resective Surgery for Shallow Intrabony Defects: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.1
Abdusalam E Alrmali, Parham Hazrati, Hamzeh Almanshi, Muhammad H A Saleh, Hom-Lay Wang, Francesco Cairo, Purnima Kumar
{"title":"Fiber Retention Osseous Resective Surgery for Shallow Intrabony Defects: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdusalam E Alrmali, Parham Hazrati, Hamzeh Almanshi, Muhammad H A Saleh, Hom-Lay Wang, Francesco Cairo, Purnima Kumar","doi":"10.11607/prd.8210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate fiber retention osseous resective surgery (FibReORS) versus conventional osseous resective surgery (ORS) for shallow intrabony defects, and to summarize the treatment effects of FibReORS via single-arm analyses. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on July 1st, 2026, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing defects < 3 mm with ≥ 6 months follow-up. Periodontal probing depth (PPD) was the primary outcome, while gingival recession (REC), pain, edema, and fibrin deposits were secondary outcomes. Five publications reporting three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis (41 patients, 54 sites) showed less REC with FibReORS at 12 months (MD = -1.35 mm; p < 0.0001), with no significant PPD difference (MD = -0.12 mm; p = 0.3327). At 1 week (43 patients, 56 sites), FibReORS was associated with lower pain (p < 0.0001), edema (p = 0.0249) and fibrin deposition (p = 0.0016). For shallow intrabony defects, FibReORS may provide PPD outcomes comparable to ORS while limiting REC and reducing short-term postoperative morbidity; however, these findings derive from only three small, short term RCTs graded as low to very low certainty, warranting cautious interpretation and further high-quality studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.8210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate fiber retention osseous resective surgery (FibReORS) versus conventional osseous resective surgery (ORS) for shallow intrabony defects, and to summarize the treatment effects of FibReORS via single-arm analyses. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on July 1st, 2026, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing defects < 3 mm with ≥ 6 months follow-up. Periodontal probing depth (PPD) was the primary outcome, while gingival recession (REC), pain, edema, and fibrin deposits were secondary outcomes. Five publications reporting three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis (41 patients, 54 sites) showed less REC with FibReORS at 12 months (MD = -1.35 mm; p < 0.0001), with no significant PPD difference (MD = -0.12 mm; p = 0.3327). At 1 week (43 patients, 56 sites), FibReORS was associated with lower pain (p < 0.0001), edema (p = 0.0249) and fibrin deposition (p = 0.0016). For shallow intrabony defects, FibReORS may provide PPD outcomes comparable to ORS while limiting REC and reducing short-term postoperative morbidity; however, these findings derive from only three small, short term RCTs graded as low to very low certainty, warranting cautious interpretation and further high-quality studies.

浅骨内缺损的纤维保留骨性切除手术:比较系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书