Dropout from individual cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alberto Stefana, Stefano Damiani, Stefano Barlati, Elisa Bortolin, Matteo Cimberle, Nicoletta Cruciani, Aldo D'Imperio, Margherita Rovida, Riccardo Stefanelli, Paolo Fusar-Poli
{"title":"Dropout from individual cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Alberto Stefana, Stefano Damiani, Stefano Barlati, Elisa Bortolin, Matteo Cimberle, Nicoletta Cruciani, Aldo D'Imperio, Margherita Rovida, Riccardo Stefanelli, Paolo Fusar-Poli","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2026.2741177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a recommended psychological treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs), often delivered alongside pharmacotherapy, but dropout may limit its effectiveness. In this secondary analysis of a parent systematic review and meta-analysis focused on negative-symptom outcomes, we synthesized dropout among individual, face-to-face, outpatient CBT arms identified within that parent-review dataset. We investigated exploratory associations between dropout and arm-level sociodemographic, clinical, treatment-related, and study-design characteristics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of a comprehensive database from a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for SSDs, which searched PsycINFO and all Web of Knowledge databases. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that included at least one arm delivering in-person, individual CBT in outpatient settings and reported dropout. Thirteen studies, comprising 16 psychotherapy arms and 865 participants, met eligibility criteria. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled dropout rate, and mixed-effects meta-regression models were conducted to examine sociodemographic, clinical, treatment-related, and study-design moderators.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Across this heterogeneous set of individual CBT arms, the pooled dropout estimate was approximately one in five participants, with substantial between-arm heterogeneity. Associations with available arm-level moderators were exploratory and should not be interpreted as causal or as evidence that a moderator has no effect when the analysis was underpowered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This secondary analysis provides a descriptive estimate of dropout within the individual CBT arms retained by the parent review. The estimate is an average across heterogeneous studies and settings, and the moderator analyses are exploratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2026.2741177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a recommended psychological treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs), often delivered alongside pharmacotherapy, but dropout may limit its effectiveness. In this secondary analysis of a parent systematic review and meta-analysis focused on negative-symptom outcomes, we synthesized dropout among individual, face-to-face, outpatient CBT arms identified within that parent-review dataset. We investigated exploratory associations between dropout and arm-level sociodemographic, clinical, treatment-related, and study-design characteristics.

Study design: This study was a secondary analysis of a comprehensive database from a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for SSDs, which searched PsycINFO and all Web of Knowledge databases. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that included at least one arm delivering in-person, individual CBT in outpatient settings and reported dropout. Thirteen studies, comprising 16 psychotherapy arms and 865 participants, met eligibility criteria. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled dropout rate, and mixed-effects meta-regression models were conducted to examine sociodemographic, clinical, treatment-related, and study-design moderators.

Study results: Across this heterogeneous set of individual CBT arms, the pooled dropout estimate was approximately one in five participants, with substantial between-arm heterogeneity. Associations with available arm-level moderators were exploratory and should not be interpreted as causal or as evidence that a moderator has no effect when the analysis was underpowered.

Conclusions: This secondary analysis provides a descriptive estimate of dropout within the individual CBT arms retained by the parent review. The estimate is an average across heterogeneous studies and settings, and the moderator analyses are exploratory.

精神分裂症患者退出个体认知行为心理治疗:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景与假设:认知行为疗法(CBT)是一种推荐的精神分裂症谱系障碍(ssd)的心理治疗方法,通常与药物治疗同时进行,但退出治疗可能会限制其有效性。在对父母系统评价和集中于负面症状结果的荟萃分析的二次分析中,我们综合了在父母评价数据集中确定的个体、面对面、门诊CBT组的辍学率。我们探索性地调查了辍学率与臂水平社会人口学、临床、治疗相关和研究设计特征之间的关联。研究设计:本研究是对一个综合数据库的二次分析,该数据库来自最近对ssd治疗的系统综述和荟萃分析,检索了PsycINFO和所有Web of Knowledge数据库。符合条件的研究是随机临床试验,包括至少一组在门诊进行个人CBT治疗和报告的退出。13项研究,包括16个心理治疗组和865名参与者,符合资格标准。随机效应模型用于估计合并辍学率,混合效应元回归模型用于检验社会人口学、临床、治疗相关和研究设计调节因子。研究结果:在这组异质性的个体CBT组中,合并的退出估计约为五分之一的参与者,存在显著的组间异质性。与现有调节因子的关联是探索性的,不应被解释为因果关系,也不应被解释为在分析能力不足时调节因子没有作用的证据。结论:这一次要分析提供了父母评价中保留的单个CBT组中辍学率的描述性估计。估计是跨异质研究和设置的平均值,调节分析是探索性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书