Exploring undergraduate nursing students' preparation to care for children and their families in Australia: a scoping review.

IF 6.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Melisa Jayne Young, Huaqiong Zhou, Yunia Eka Sari Kolikiana, Janie Alison Brown
{"title":"Exploring undergraduate nursing students' preparation to care for children and their families in Australia: a scoping review.","authors":"Melisa Jayne Young, Huaqiong Zhou, Yunia Eka Sari Kolikiana, Janie Alison Brown","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to identify and map the breadth of evidence available that describes the preparation of preregistration nursing students to provide care to infants, children, young people, and their families in an Australian context.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nursing graduates in Australia are expected to deliver safe and competent care to children and families across diverse health care settings. However, pediatric nursing education is commonly embedded within integrated lifespan curricula, with limited access to dedicated pediatric units or clinical placements. This lack of structured pediatric preparation has been associated with student anxiety, reduced confidence, challenges in age-appropriate communication, and reluctance to pursue pediatric nursing pathways following graduation, raising concerns about patient safety and workforce sustainability.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This scoping review included published and unpublished literature relevant to undergraduate preregistration nursing students in Australia. Evidence sources published from 2010 onward were eligible and included empirical studies, non-empirical literature, policy documents, professional standards, and gray literature related to the preparation of nursing students to care for children and their families across all health care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A 3-step search strategy was used between December 2023 and February 2024 to identify relevant literature across the CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and ERIC (ProQuest) electronic databases, advanced Google searches, and the websites of Australian professional organizations, government bodies, pediatric hospitals, and universities. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and synthesized findings. Results were organized according to regulatory requirements and recommendations, educational preparation approaches, and student experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 10 peer-reviewed publications and 22 gray literature sources met the eligibility criteria. According to these sources, efforts to prepare nursing students to care for children commonly involved integrated curriculum approaches, simulation-based learning, and supported work-integrated learning experiences. High-fidelity simulation and alternative placement models to improve knowledge, confidence, communication skills, and clinical reasoning were identified. Immersive experiential learning to create interest in pediatric nursing pathways-particularly among students with limited prior exposure to children, including male students-was investigated. Publicly available information from universities and pediatric hospitals demonstrated variability in preparation requirements and limited transparency regarding pre-placement preparation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite clear professional and regulatory recommendations, the preparation of preregistration nursing students to care for children and families in Australia is inconsistent. Integrating pediatric education across undergraduate curricula, supported by simulation and alternative experiential learning opportunities, may enhance student confidence, readiness, and workforce participation in pediatric nursing.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/4mtf6/overview.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-25-00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aimed to identify and map the breadth of evidence available that describes the preparation of preregistration nursing students to provide care to infants, children, young people, and their families in an Australian context.

Introduction: Nursing graduates in Australia are expected to deliver safe and competent care to children and families across diverse health care settings. However, pediatric nursing education is commonly embedded within integrated lifespan curricula, with limited access to dedicated pediatric units or clinical placements. This lack of structured pediatric preparation has been associated with student anxiety, reduced confidence, challenges in age-appropriate communication, and reluctance to pursue pediatric nursing pathways following graduation, raising concerns about patient safety and workforce sustainability.

Eligibility criteria: This scoping review included published and unpublished literature relevant to undergraduate preregistration nursing students in Australia. Evidence sources published from 2010 onward were eligible and included empirical studies, non-empirical literature, policy documents, professional standards, and gray literature related to the preparation of nursing students to care for children and their families across all health care settings.

Methods: This review followed the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A 3-step search strategy was used between December 2023 and February 2024 to identify relevant literature across the CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and ERIC (ProQuest) electronic databases, advanced Google searches, and the websites of Australian professional organizations, government bodies, pediatric hospitals, and universities. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and synthesized findings. Results were organized according to regulatory requirements and recommendations, educational preparation approaches, and student experiences.

Results: In total, 10 peer-reviewed publications and 22 gray literature sources met the eligibility criteria. According to these sources, efforts to prepare nursing students to care for children commonly involved integrated curriculum approaches, simulation-based learning, and supported work-integrated learning experiences. High-fidelity simulation and alternative placement models to improve knowledge, confidence, communication skills, and clinical reasoning were identified. Immersive experiential learning to create interest in pediatric nursing pathways-particularly among students with limited prior exposure to children, including male students-was investigated. Publicly available information from universities and pediatric hospitals demonstrated variability in preparation requirements and limited transparency regarding pre-placement preparation.

Conclusions: Despite clear professional and regulatory recommendations, the preparation of preregistration nursing students to care for children and families in Australia is inconsistent. Integrating pediatric education across undergraduate curricula, supported by simulation and alternative experiential learning opportunities, may enhance student confidence, readiness, and workforce participation in pediatric nursing.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/4mtf6/overview.

探索本科护理学生在澳大利亚照顾儿童及其家庭的准备:范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书