Factors associated with the unmet need for spacing and limiting family planning: Evidence from a national survey.

IF 2.8
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2026-10-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0007412
Muhammad Khairul Alam, Rumana Rois
{"title":"Factors associated with the unmet need for spacing and limiting family planning: Evidence from a national survey.","authors":"Muhammad Khairul Alam, Rumana Rois","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0007412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional binary frameworks tend to combine the various aspects of unmet family planning needs into one general category. This study evaluates unmet family planning needs by first using conventional multinomial logistic regression to determine baseline demographic risk profiles. It then applies machine learning methods such as Random Forest and XGBoost to see if they can provide further insights into non-linear patterns and complex interactions between features that standard regression might miss. Using data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS 2022), we built a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model. Additionally, we applied sophisticated ensemble classifiers such as Random Forest and XGBoost, paired with a synthetic hybrid resampling technique (SMOTE) to address severe class imbalance. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm, and we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to visualize complex global patterns and interaction effects. Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between unmet needs and maternal age, parity, wealth, residence, and decision-making power (p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that having more children (4 or more) greatly increased the likelihood of unmet needs for spacing (aOR = 20.60) and limiting (aOR = 2.24). Wealth was notably protective against unmet needs for limiting, especially for the richest quintile (aOR = 0.48). Although SHAP analysis offered exploratory insights into complex, non-linear interactions between residence and factors such as parity and education, the predictive accuracy of tree-based models (Random Forest, XGBoost) was only moderate, with macro-averaged AUCs comparable to those of traditional regression. Therefore, population-level conclusions are most reliably drawn from the MLR model. The limitations of cross-sectional survey data as a diagnostic tool show that spacing needs are often fluid, transient, and shaped by relationships. Addressing the unmet need gap involves moving away from broad media campaigns toward localized counseling, ensuring stable rural spacing supplies, and involving husbands and mothers-in-law to turn reproductive healthcare into a shared household conversation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"6 10","pages":"e0007412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13652253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional binary frameworks tend to combine the various aspects of unmet family planning needs into one general category. This study evaluates unmet family planning needs by first using conventional multinomial logistic regression to determine baseline demographic risk profiles. It then applies machine learning methods such as Random Forest and XGBoost to see if they can provide further insights into non-linear patterns and complex interactions between features that standard regression might miss. Using data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS 2022), we built a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model. Additionally, we applied sophisticated ensemble classifiers such as Random Forest and XGBoost, paired with a synthetic hybrid resampling technique (SMOTE) to address severe class imbalance. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm, and we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to visualize complex global patterns and interaction effects. Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between unmet needs and maternal age, parity, wealth, residence, and decision-making power (p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that having more children (4 or more) greatly increased the likelihood of unmet needs for spacing (aOR = 20.60) and limiting (aOR = 2.24). Wealth was notably protective against unmet needs for limiting, especially for the richest quintile (aOR = 0.48). Although SHAP analysis offered exploratory insights into complex, non-linear interactions between residence and factors such as parity and education, the predictive accuracy of tree-based models (Random Forest, XGBoost) was only moderate, with macro-averaged AUCs comparable to those of traditional regression. Therefore, population-level conclusions are most reliably drawn from the MLR model. The limitations of cross-sectional survey data as a diagnostic tool show that spacing needs are often fluid, transient, and shaped by relationships. Addressing the unmet need gap involves moving away from broad media campaigns toward localized counseling, ensuring stable rural spacing supplies, and involving husbands and mothers-in-law to turn reproductive healthcare into a shared household conversation.

与未满足间隔需求和限制计划生育有关的因素:来自全国调查的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书