Prophylaxis Durations and Risks of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An International, Multicenter Cohort Study.
Anja Lindis Dahl, Oriol Manuel, Michael Koller, Joanne Reekie, Erich Tusch, Kasper Moestrup, Michael Perch, Kasper Rossing, Nicolai Schultz, Soren Schwartz Sorensen, Kristian Schønning, Jens Lundgren, Nicolas Johannes Mueller, Marie Helleberg
{"title":"Prophylaxis Durations and Risks of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An International, Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Anja Lindis Dahl, Oriol Manuel, Michael Koller, Joanne Reekie, Erich Tusch, Kasper Moestrup, Michael Perch, Kasper Rossing, Nicolai Schultz, Soren Schwartz Sorensen, Kristian Schønning, Jens Lundgren, Nicolas Johannes Mueller, Marie Helleberg","doi":"10.1111/tid.70321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal duration of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) remains undetermined. We evaluated real-life preventive strategies on the incidence of CMV disease in an international SOTr cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All CMV IgG donor (D)+/recipient (R)- or R+ SOTr in Zürich, Lausanne, and Copenhagen (2008-2022) were followed 12-month post-transplantation. Multivariable Poisson regression examined associations between antiviral prophylaxis duration and risk of CMV infection and CMV disease at time of infection diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 3203 non-lung (2057 kidney, 815 liver, 331 heart) and 620 lung transplant recipients. Strategies for CMV prophylaxis durations varied from none to ≥ 12 months. For D+/R- non-lung SOTr, no prophylaxis with preemptive therapy only versus 3 months of prophylaxis was associated with higher risk of CMV infection and disease (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% CI] 2.46 [1.69-3.57], and 2.82 [1.18-6.68]). Risk did not differ between 3 and 6 months of prophylaxis. For D+/R- lung transplant recipients, 3 versus 6 months of prophylaxis was associated with higher risk of CMV infection and high CMV DNAemia (2.74 [1.36-5.52] and 8.10 [1.89-41.90]), but not significantly higher risk of CMV disease. Irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis duration, incidence of CMV disease was lower among R+ compared to D+/R- SOTr.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a setting with CMV surveillance after prophylaxis, 3 months of antiviral prophylaxis seems adequate to prevent CMV disease in D+/R- non-lung SOTr, whereas lung transplant recipients may benefit from longer duration of prophylaxis. Risk of CMV disease was low among R+ SOTr, irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The optimal duration of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) remains undetermined. We evaluated real-life preventive strategies on the incidence of CMV disease in an international SOTr cohort.
Methods: All CMV IgG donor (D)+/recipient (R)- or R+ SOTr in Zürich, Lausanne, and Copenhagen (2008-2022) were followed 12-month post-transplantation. Multivariable Poisson regression examined associations between antiviral prophylaxis duration and risk of CMV infection and CMV disease at time of infection diagnosis.
Results: We included 3203 non-lung (2057 kidney, 815 liver, 331 heart) and 620 lung transplant recipients. Strategies for CMV prophylaxis durations varied from none to ≥ 12 months. For D+/R- non-lung SOTr, no prophylaxis with preemptive therapy only versus 3 months of prophylaxis was associated with higher risk of CMV infection and disease (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% CI] 2.46 [1.69-3.57], and 2.82 [1.18-6.68]). Risk did not differ between 3 and 6 months of prophylaxis. For D+/R- lung transplant recipients, 3 versus 6 months of prophylaxis was associated with higher risk of CMV infection and high CMV DNAemia (2.74 [1.36-5.52] and 8.10 [1.89-41.90]), but not significantly higher risk of CMV disease. Irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis duration, incidence of CMV disease was lower among R+ compared to D+/R- SOTr.
Conclusions: In a setting with CMV surveillance after prophylaxis, 3 months of antiviral prophylaxis seems adequate to prevent CMV disease in D+/R- non-lung SOTr, whereas lung transplant recipients may benefit from longer duration of prophylaxis. Risk of CMV disease was low among R+ SOTr, irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.