Prophylaxis Durations and Risks of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An International, Multicenter Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Anja Lindis Dahl, Oriol Manuel, Michael Koller, Joanne Reekie, Erich Tusch, Kasper Moestrup, Michael Perch, Kasper Rossing, Nicolai Schultz, Soren Schwartz Sorensen, Kristian Schønning, Jens Lundgren, Nicolas Johannes Mueller, Marie Helleberg
{"title":"Prophylaxis Durations and Risks of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An International, Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Anja Lindis Dahl, Oriol Manuel, Michael Koller, Joanne Reekie, Erich Tusch, Kasper Moestrup, Michael Perch, Kasper Rossing, Nicolai Schultz, Soren Schwartz Sorensen, Kristian Schønning, Jens Lundgren, Nicolas Johannes Mueller, Marie Helleberg","doi":"10.1111/tid.70321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal duration of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) remains undetermined. We evaluated real-life preventive strategies on the incidence of CMV disease in an international SOTr cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All CMV IgG donor (D)+/recipient (R)- or R+ SOTr in Zürich, Lausanne, and Copenhagen (2008-2022) were followed 12-month post-transplantation. Multivariable Poisson regression examined associations between antiviral prophylaxis duration and risk of CMV infection and CMV disease at time of infection diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 3203 non-lung (2057 kidney, 815 liver, 331 heart) and 620 lung transplant recipients. Strategies for CMV prophylaxis durations varied from none to ≥ 12 months. For D+/R- non-lung SOTr, no prophylaxis with preemptive therapy only versus 3 months of prophylaxis was associated with higher risk of CMV infection and disease (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% CI] 2.46 [1.69-3.57], and 2.82 [1.18-6.68]). Risk did not differ between 3 and 6 months of prophylaxis. For D+/R- lung transplant recipients, 3 versus 6 months of prophylaxis was associated with higher risk of CMV infection and high CMV DNAemia (2.74 [1.36-5.52] and 8.10 [1.89-41.90]), but not significantly higher risk of CMV disease. Irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis duration, incidence of CMV disease was lower among R+ compared to D+/R- SOTr.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a setting with CMV surveillance after prophylaxis, 3 months of antiviral prophylaxis seems adequate to prevent CMV disease in D+/R- non-lung SOTr, whereas lung transplant recipients may benefit from longer duration of prophylaxis. Risk of CMV disease was low among R+ SOTr, irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal duration of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) remains undetermined. We evaluated real-life preventive strategies on the incidence of CMV disease in an international SOTr cohort.

Methods: All CMV IgG donor (D)+/recipient (R)- or R+ SOTr in Zürich, Lausanne, and Copenhagen (2008-2022) were followed 12-month post-transplantation. Multivariable Poisson regression examined associations between antiviral prophylaxis duration and risk of CMV infection and CMV disease at time of infection diagnosis.

Results: We included 3203 non-lung (2057 kidney, 815 liver, 331 heart) and 620 lung transplant recipients. Strategies for CMV prophylaxis durations varied from none to ≥ 12 months. For D+/R- non-lung SOTr, no prophylaxis with preemptive therapy only versus 3 months of prophylaxis was associated with higher risk of CMV infection and disease (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% CI] 2.46 [1.69-3.57], and 2.82 [1.18-6.68]). Risk did not differ between 3 and 6 months of prophylaxis. For D+/R- lung transplant recipients, 3 versus 6 months of prophylaxis was associated with higher risk of CMV infection and high CMV DNAemia (2.74 [1.36-5.52] and 8.10 [1.89-41.90]), but not significantly higher risk of CMV disease. Irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis duration, incidence of CMV disease was lower among R+ compared to D+/R- SOTr.

Conclusions: In a setting with CMV surveillance after prophylaxis, 3 months of antiviral prophylaxis seems adequate to prevent CMV disease in D+/R- non-lung SOTr, whereas lung transplant recipients may benefit from longer duration of prophylaxis. Risk of CMV disease was low among R+ SOTr, irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis.

实体器官移植受者巨细胞病毒感染和疾病的预防持续时间和风险:一项国际、多中心队列研究
背景:实体器官移植受者(SOTr)巨细胞病毒(CMV)预防的最佳持续时间仍未确定。我们在一个国际SOTr队列中评估了CMV疾病发病率的现实预防策略。方法:2008-2022年,在z里奇、洛桑和哥本哈根,对所有CMV IgG供体(D)+/受体(R)-或R+ SOTr进行移植后12个月的随访。多变量泊松回归检验了在感染诊断时抗病毒预防持续时间与巨细胞病毒感染和巨细胞病毒疾病风险之间的关系。结果:我们纳入了3203例非肺移植受者(2057例肾、815例肝、331例心脏)和620例肺移植受者。CMV预防持续时间的策略从无到≥12个月不等。对于D+/R-非肺SOTr,不进行预防性治疗与3个月预防性治疗相比,CMV感染和疾病的风险更高(校正发病率比[aIRR] [95% CI] 2.46[1.69-3.57]和2.82[1.18-6.68])。预防3个月和6个月的风险没有差异。对于D+/R-肺移植受者,3个月和6个月的预防与CMV感染和高CMV dna血症的高风险相关(2.74[1.36-5.52]和8.10[1.89-41.90]),但CMV疾病的风险未显着增加。无论抗病毒预防时间长短,与D+/R- SOTr相比,R+组巨细胞病毒发病率较低。结论:在预防后进行巨细胞病毒监测的情况下,3个月的抗病毒预防似乎足以预防D+/R-非肺SOTr的巨细胞病毒疾病,而肺移植受者可能受益于更长的预防时间。R+ SOTr患者发生巨细胞病毒疾病的风险较低,与抗病毒预防无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书