Coronary bypass outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia are significantly worse than in patients with non-critical lower extremity arterial disease.
{"title":"Coronary bypass outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia are significantly worse than in patients with non-critical lower extremity arterial disease.","authors":"Kentaro Shirakura, Yuki Setogawa, Ryohei Ushioda, Daisuke Takeyoshi, Masahiro Tsutsui, Shinsuke Kikuchi, Nobuyoshi Azuma, Hiroyuki Kamiya, Shingo Kunioka","doi":"10.1007/s00595-026-03499-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) is a risk factor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); however, the impact of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), its most advanced stage, remains unclear. We evaluated early and long-term outcomes of CABG in CLTI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 334 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2014 and 2024. Patients were stratified into three groups: CLTI (n = 22), non-CLTI LEAD (n = 41), and non-LEAD (n = 271). The primary endpoint was long-term survival; the secondary endpoints were 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CLTI group had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (90.9%) and hemodialysis (86.4%) (p < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality was similar (9.1%, 2.4%, and 5.5%; p = 0.52), whereas five-year survival was significantly lower in the CLTI group (39.8% vs. 86.2% and 90.8%; p < 0.01). A Cox analysis showed that age, hemodialysis, and acute myocardial infarction were independent predictors of 5-year survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CLTI predicts poor long-term survival because of comorbidities. In this high-risk population, individualized strategies balancing the extent of coronary revascularization against operative risk may achieve acceptable early outcomes, although the safety of incomplete/functional revascularization requires confirmation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03499-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) is a risk factor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); however, the impact of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), its most advanced stage, remains unclear. We evaluated early and long-term outcomes of CABG in CLTI.
Method: We retrospectively analyzed 334 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2014 and 2024. Patients were stratified into three groups: CLTI (n = 22), non-CLTI LEAD (n = 41), and non-LEAD (n = 271). The primary endpoint was long-term survival; the secondary endpoints were 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
Results: The CLTI group had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (90.9%) and hemodialysis (86.4%) (p < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality was similar (9.1%, 2.4%, and 5.5%; p = 0.52), whereas five-year survival was significantly lower in the CLTI group (39.8% vs. 86.2% and 90.8%; p < 0.01). A Cox analysis showed that age, hemodialysis, and acute myocardial infarction were independent predictors of 5-year survival.
Conclusions: CLTI predicts poor long-term survival because of comorbidities. In this high-risk population, individualized strategies balancing the extent of coronary revascularization against operative risk may achieve acceptable early outcomes, although the safety of incomplete/functional revascularization requires confirmation in larger cohorts.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.