Treatment of recurrent barotraumatic and infectious frontal sinusitis by navigated balloon dilation of the nasofrontal duct.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
M Bonnin, C Monnot, C-H Hassan, M Kérimian, L de Gabory
{"title":"Treatment of recurrent barotraumatic and infectious frontal sinusitis by navigated balloon dilation of the nasofrontal duct.","authors":"M Bonnin, C Monnot, C-H Hassan, M Kérimian, L de Gabory","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2026.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recurrent barotraumatic or isolated infectious frontal sinusitis is linked to anatomical variants of the nasofrontal duct (NFD). Anterior ethmoidectomy, the standard treatment, is incomplete in 50-80% of cases, incurring a 19% rate of stenosis. Balloon dilation of the NFD could be an alternative.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary study objective was to evaluate the safety of the device. The secondary objective was to analyze its long-term efficacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center study including patients treated by NFD enlargement using a navigated dilation balloon. The following data were collected: pre- and post-operative symptoms, preoperative CT scans, follow-up time, return to activities, adverse effects and complications, additional care, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients were included: 10 with recurrent isolated infectious sinusitis and 11 with recurrent barotraumatic sinusitis (27 frontal sinuses). There was 1 case of eyelid ecchymosis, and no CSF leaks. Mean follow-up was 36.3±38 months. Ninety-one percent of patients were able to resume their activities involving pressure variations. None required hospitalization, repeat consultation or surgical revision. Four patients experienced symptom recurrence, including 2 for reasons other than the frontal sinus. 86% of patients were satisfied with the procedure, 9.5% were indifferent, and only 1 patient was dissatisfied (recurrence of headaches).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Navigated balloon dilation of the NFD was a safe and effective treatment option for these two indications and could replace ethmoidectomy as a first-line procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":48834,"journal":{"name":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2026.09.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent barotraumatic or isolated infectious frontal sinusitis is linked to anatomical variants of the nasofrontal duct (NFD). Anterior ethmoidectomy, the standard treatment, is incomplete in 50-80% of cases, incurring a 19% rate of stenosis. Balloon dilation of the NFD could be an alternative.

Objectives: The primary study objective was to evaluate the safety of the device. The secondary objective was to analyze its long-term efficacy.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective single-center study including patients treated by NFD enlargement using a navigated dilation balloon. The following data were collected: pre- and post-operative symptoms, preoperative CT scans, follow-up time, return to activities, adverse effects and complications, additional care, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Twenty-one patients were included: 10 with recurrent isolated infectious sinusitis and 11 with recurrent barotraumatic sinusitis (27 frontal sinuses). There was 1 case of eyelid ecchymosis, and no CSF leaks. Mean follow-up was 36.3±38 months. Ninety-one percent of patients were able to resume their activities involving pressure variations. None required hospitalization, repeat consultation or surgical revision. Four patients experienced symptom recurrence, including 2 for reasons other than the frontal sinus. 86% of patients were satisfied with the procedure, 9.5% were indifferent, and only 1 patient was dissatisfied (recurrence of headaches).

Conclusion: Navigated balloon dilation of the NFD was a safe and effective treatment option for these two indications and could replace ethmoidectomy as a first-line procedure.

导航球囊扩张鼻额管治疗复发性气压创伤性感染性额窦炎。
复发性气压创伤性或孤立性感染性额窦炎与鼻额管(NFD)的解剖变异有关。标准的筛前切除术在50-80%的病例中是不完全的,导致19%的狭窄率。球囊扩张NFD可能是另一种选择。目的:主要研究目的是评估该装置的安全性。次要目的是分析其长期疗效。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性的单中心研究,包括使用导航扩张球囊治疗NFD扩大的患者。收集以下数据:术前和术后症状、术前CT扫描、随访时间、恢复活动、不良反应和并发症、额外护理和患者满意度。结果:21例患者:复发性孤立性感染性鼻窦炎10例,复发性气压创伤性鼻窦炎11例(额窦27例)。眼睑淤斑1例,无脑脊液渗漏。平均随访36.3±38个月。91%的患者能够恢复他们的活动,包括压力变化。没有人需要住院、复诊或手术翻修。4例患者出现症状复发,其中2例为额窦以外的原因。86%的患者对手术满意,9.5%不满意,只有1例患者不满意(头痛复发)。结论:对于这两种适应症,导航球囊扩张是一种安全有效的治疗选择,可以取代筛切除术作为一线手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
28.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: European Annals of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck diseases heir of one of the oldest otorhinolaryngology journals in Europe is the official organ of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) and the the International Francophone Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIFORL). Today six annual issues provide original peer reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches and review articles giving most up-to-date insights in all areas of otology, laryngology rhinology, head and neck surgery. The European Annals also publish the SFORL guidelines and recommendations.The journal is a unique two-armed publication: the European Annals (ANORL) is an English language well referenced online journal (e-only) whereas the Annales Françaises d’ORL (AFORL), mail-order paper and online edition in French language are aimed at the French-speaking community. French language teams must submit their articles in French to the AFORL site. Federating journal in its field, the European Annals has an Editorial board of experts with international reputation that allow to make an important contribution to communication on new research data and clinical practice by publishing high-quality articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书