Orbital Fracture Repair Materials: Research Hotspots, Clinical Applications, and Emerging Technologies.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Xiaolin Huang, Leilei Zhang, Yuan Deng
{"title":"Orbital Fracture Repair Materials: Research Hotspots, Clinical Applications, and Emerging Technologies.","authors":"Xiaolin Huang, Leilei Zhang, Yuan Deng","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000013490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orbital fractures, particularly of the medial and inferior walls, often require precise reconstruction to restore orbital volume and prevent enophthalmos, diplopia, and facial deformity. The selection of repair material, ranging from titanium meshes and porous polyethylene to resorbable polymers and tissue-engineered scaffolds, is therefore central to surgical success, yet a clinically oriented synthesis of the available options remains lacking. This study combines a bibliometric mapping with a focused review of repair materials to chart how the field has evolved and to clarify the relationship between material properties, fracture pattern, and treatment strategy. Literature published from 1990 to 2025 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package \"bibliometrix\"; 1156 articles were included. The USA contributed the largest number of publications (272), followed by South Korea (124) and China (118), with the University of Helsinki (58 articles) and the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (H-index 32) being the most productive institution and journal, respectively. Six thematic clusters were identified: biomaterial types, outcome prediction, complications, absorbable polymers, allografts, and surgical approaches. Keyword burst analysis highlighted emerging interests in \"floor\" (2021-2025) and \"intraoperative navigation\" (2022-2025). We further map these clusters onto concrete clinical scenarios: small orbital floor defects may be managed with resorbable polymers, whereas extensive, comminuted fractures or cases with severe enophthalmos require the rigid support of titanium or patient-specific implants (PSI). The field is progressing from conventional fixation toward computer-assisted planning, PSI, and bioactive tissue-engineered constructs. Future efforts should prioritize validating navigation-guided implantation for orbital floor reconstruction while advancing novel biomaterials that promote osteogenesis and minimize complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000013490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orbital fractures, particularly of the medial and inferior walls, often require precise reconstruction to restore orbital volume and prevent enophthalmos, diplopia, and facial deformity. The selection of repair material, ranging from titanium meshes and porous polyethylene to resorbable polymers and tissue-engineered scaffolds, is therefore central to surgical success, yet a clinically oriented synthesis of the available options remains lacking. This study combines a bibliometric mapping with a focused review of repair materials to chart how the field has evolved and to clarify the relationship between material properties, fracture pattern, and treatment strategy. Literature published from 1990 to 2025 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package "bibliometrix"; 1156 articles were included. The USA contributed the largest number of publications (272), followed by South Korea (124) and China (118), with the University of Helsinki (58 articles) and the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (H-index 32) being the most productive institution and journal, respectively. Six thematic clusters were identified: biomaterial types, outcome prediction, complications, absorbable polymers, allografts, and surgical approaches. Keyword burst analysis highlighted emerging interests in "floor" (2021-2025) and "intraoperative navigation" (2022-2025). We further map these clusters onto concrete clinical scenarios: small orbital floor defects may be managed with resorbable polymers, whereas extensive, comminuted fractures or cases with severe enophthalmos require the rigid support of titanium or patient-specific implants (PSI). The field is progressing from conventional fixation toward computer-assisted planning, PSI, and bioactive tissue-engineered constructs. Future efforts should prioritize validating navigation-guided implantation for orbital floor reconstruction while advancing novel biomaterials that promote osteogenesis and minimize complications.

眼眶骨折修复材料:研究热点、临床应用及新兴技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书