Association of neighborhood deprivation with pain, function, and disability recovery trajectories following cervical spine surgery.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yifei Sun, Sasha Howell, Nicholas M B Laskay, Jovanna Tracz, Anil Mahavadi, James Mooney, Jakub Godzik
{"title":"Association of neighborhood deprivation with pain, function, and disability recovery trajectories following cervical spine surgery.","authors":"Yifei Sun, Sasha Howell, Nicholas M B Laskay, Jovanna Tracz, Anil Mahavadi, James Mooney, Jakub Godzik","doi":"10.3171/2026.4.SPINE26111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although neighborhood deprivation has been shown to predict complications and readmissions, its association with pain, disability, and function in degenerative cervical spine disease has not been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a single-center prospectively collected database of patients who underwent elective cervical spine surgery from January 2021 to September 2024. PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10 Global Health physical and mental health domains, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck pain and arm pain. Neighborhood disadvantage was assessed via the ADI, with higher values indicating greater deprivation. Outcomes were assessed at preoperative and 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative time points. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed at each time point. Missing data were handled with imputation. Unadjusted comparisons and 1-way ANOVA were used to evaluate differences in PROMs across ADI quartiles, and multivariable adjusted linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between ADI and PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 449 patients (mean age 57.9 years) included in this analysis. Patients in higher ADI quartiles of deprivation reported significantly worse preoperative pain, disability, and health-related quality of life, with higher NRS neck and arm pain scores and NDI scores, and lower PROMIS physical and mental health domain scores (p ≤ 0.005). These disparities persisted at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, with patients in the highest deprivation quartile demonstrating worse pain, disability, and PROMIS outcomes compared with those in lower quartiles (p < 0.01). However, this difference was no longer seen by 12 months. In the multivariable regression analysis, high deprivation independently predicted worse baseline PROMs and reduced improvement in pain, disability, and PROMIS physical function at 3 and 6 months after surgery, although this association did not persist at 12 months. Deprivation was inconsistently associated with achieving the MCID, with lower odds for the NDI, NRS for arm pain, and PROMIS domains at early time points but without persisting disadvantage at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher levels of deprivation according to the ADI were associated with worse preoperative disease severity and worse quality of life and function during early recovery, but with improvements at later time points. Patients with greater socioeconomic deprivation can derive significant benefit from surgical intervention for degenerative cervical spine conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.4.SPINE26111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although neighborhood deprivation has been shown to predict complications and readmissions, its association with pain, disability, and function in degenerative cervical spine disease has not been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a single-center prospectively collected database of patients who underwent elective cervical spine surgery from January 2021 to September 2024. PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10 Global Health physical and mental health domains, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck pain and arm pain. Neighborhood disadvantage was assessed via the ADI, with higher values indicating greater deprivation. Outcomes were assessed at preoperative and 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative time points. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed at each time point. Missing data were handled with imputation. Unadjusted comparisons and 1-way ANOVA were used to evaluate differences in PROMs across ADI quartiles, and multivariable adjusted linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between ADI and PROMs.

Results: There were 449 patients (mean age 57.9 years) included in this analysis. Patients in higher ADI quartiles of deprivation reported significantly worse preoperative pain, disability, and health-related quality of life, with higher NRS neck and arm pain scores and NDI scores, and lower PROMIS physical and mental health domain scores (p ≤ 0.005). These disparities persisted at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, with patients in the highest deprivation quartile demonstrating worse pain, disability, and PROMIS outcomes compared with those in lower quartiles (p < 0.01). However, this difference was no longer seen by 12 months. In the multivariable regression analysis, high deprivation independently predicted worse baseline PROMs and reduced improvement in pain, disability, and PROMIS physical function at 3 and 6 months after surgery, although this association did not persist at 12 months. Deprivation was inconsistently associated with achieving the MCID, with lower odds for the NDI, NRS for arm pain, and PROMIS domains at early time points but without persisting disadvantage at 12 months.

Conclusions: Higher levels of deprivation according to the ADI were associated with worse preoperative disease severity and worse quality of life and function during early recovery, but with improvements at later time points. Patients with greater socioeconomic deprivation can derive significant benefit from surgical intervention for degenerative cervical spine conditions.

颈椎手术后邻里剥夺与疼痛、功能和残疾恢复轨迹的关系。
目的:虽然邻里剥夺已被证明可以预测并发症和再入院,但其与退行性颈椎疾病的疼痛、残疾和功能的关系尚未得到证实。本研究的目的是调查术前、术后3、6和12个月的区域剥夺指数(ADI)与患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)之间的关系。方法:这是对2021年1月至2024年9月接受择期颈椎手术患者的单中心前瞻性数据库进行的二次分析。PROMs包括患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)-10全球健康生理和心理健康领域,颈部残疾指数(NDI)和颈部疼痛和手臂疼痛的数字评定量表(NRS)。邻里劣势通过ADI进行评估,数值越高表明剥夺程度越严重。在术前、术后3个月、6个月和12个月的时间点评估结果。在每个时间点评估最小临床重要差异(MCID)。对缺失数据进行了补全处理。采用未调整比较和单因素方差分析来评估ADI四分位数中PROMs的差异,并采用多变量调整线性回归模型来评估ADI与PROMs之间的关系。结果:共纳入449例患者,平均年龄57.9岁。ADI四分位数剥夺程度较高的患者报告术前疼痛、残疾和健康相关生活质量显著加重,NRS颈、臂疼痛评分和NDI评分较高,PROMIS身心健康领域评分较低(p≤0.005)。这些差异在术后3个月和6个月持续存在,与较低四分位数的患者相比,最高剥夺四分位数的患者表现出更严重的疼痛、残疾和PROMIS结果(p < 0.01)。然而,这种差异在12个月后不再出现。在多变量回归分析中,在术后3个月和6个月,高剥夺独立预测更差的基线PROMs和疼痛、残疾和PROMIS身体功能的改善,尽管这种关联在12个月时不存在。剥夺与实现MCID的相关性不一致,在早期时间点NDI、手臂疼痛的NRS和PROMIS域的几率较低,但在12个月时没有持续的劣势。结论:根据ADI,较高水平的剥夺与术前疾病严重程度和早期恢复期间的生活质量和功能较差相关,但在后期时间点有所改善。社会经济条件较差的患者可以从退行性颈椎手术治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书