Toward Precision Cardio-Oncology: Integrating Biomarkers and Cardiac Imaging for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients With Cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Annabelle Sabouret, Domenico Mario Giamundo, Mamas Mamas, Elad Asher, Giuseppe Ando Apos, Dan Atar, Pierre Sabouret
{"title":"Toward Precision Cardio-Oncology: Integrating Biomarkers and Cardiac Imaging for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients With Cancer.","authors":"Annabelle Sabouret, Domenico Mario Giamundo, Mamas Mamas, Elad Asher, Giuseppe Ando Apos, Dan Atar, Pierre Sabouret","doi":"10.1159/ort/aecag009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease and cancer frequently coexist, and cardiovascular toxicity can limit the delivery of effective anticancer therapy and influence long-term outcomes. Conventional cardiovascular risk scores were not designed for oncology populations and do not fully capture treatment-related risk. This narrative review examines how clinical assessment, circulating biomarkers, and multimodality imaging can be combined to refine cardiovascular risk stratification before, during, and after cancer treatment. High-sensitivity cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides provide complementary information on myocardial injury and hemodynamic stress, whereas echocardiography with global longitudinal strain enables detection of subclinical dysfunction before a fall in left ventricular ejection fraction. Cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and selected nuclear imaging techniques provide additional tissue, coronary, vascular, and inflammatory characterization when clinically indicated. Recent validation studies support treatment-specific risk assessment, but important limitations remain, including variable biomarker thresholds, incomplete external validation of risk models, inter-vendor variability in strain measurements, and limited randomized evidence that surveillance strategies improve hard clinical outcomes. A practical precision cardio-oncology approach should therefore integrate baseline risk, treatment exposure, serial biomarker trends, and appropriately selected imaging rather than rely on a single test.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/ort/aecag009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease and cancer frequently coexist, and cardiovascular toxicity can limit the delivery of effective anticancer therapy and influence long-term outcomes. Conventional cardiovascular risk scores were not designed for oncology populations and do not fully capture treatment-related risk. This narrative review examines how clinical assessment, circulating biomarkers, and multimodality imaging can be combined to refine cardiovascular risk stratification before, during, and after cancer treatment. High-sensitivity cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides provide complementary information on myocardial injury and hemodynamic stress, whereas echocardiography with global longitudinal strain enables detection of subclinical dysfunction before a fall in left ventricular ejection fraction. Cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and selected nuclear imaging techniques provide additional tissue, coronary, vascular, and inflammatory characterization when clinically indicated. Recent validation studies support treatment-specific risk assessment, but important limitations remain, including variable biomarker thresholds, incomplete external validation of risk models, inter-vendor variability in strain measurements, and limited randomized evidence that surveillance strategies improve hard clinical outcomes. A practical precision cardio-oncology approach should therefore integrate baseline risk, treatment exposure, serial biomarker trends, and appropriately selected imaging rather than rely on a single test.

迈向精确心脏肿瘤学:整合生物标志物和心脏成像用于癌症患者心血管风险评估。
心血管疾病和癌症经常共存,心血管毒性可以限制有效抗癌治疗的提供并影响长期结果。传统的心血管风险评分不是为肿瘤人群设计的,也不能完全捕捉到治疗相关的风险。这篇叙述性综述探讨了临床评估、循环生物标志物和多模态成像如何结合起来,在癌症治疗之前、期间和之后完善心血管风险分层。高灵敏度的心肌肌钙蛋白和利钠肽提供了心肌损伤和血流动力学应激的补充信息,而超声心动图具有全局纵向应变,可以在左心室射血分数下降之前检测亚临床功能障碍。心脏磁共振、心脏计算机断层扫描和选定的核成像技术在临床指征时提供额外的组织、冠状动脉、血管和炎症特征。最近的验证研究支持治疗特异性风险评估,但仍然存在重要的局限性,包括可变的生物标志物阈值,风险模型的外部验证不完整,应变测量的供应商之间的差异,以及有限的随机证据表明监测策略改善了硬临床结果。因此,一种实用的精确心脏肿瘤学方法应该整合基线风险、治疗暴露、系列生物标志物趋势和适当选择的成像,而不是依赖于单一的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书