Annabelle Sabouret, Domenico Mario Giamundo, Mamas Mamas, Elad Asher, Giuseppe Ando Apos, Dan Atar, Pierre Sabouret
{"title":"Toward Precision Cardio-Oncology: Integrating Biomarkers and Cardiac Imaging for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients With Cancer.","authors":"Annabelle Sabouret, Domenico Mario Giamundo, Mamas Mamas, Elad Asher, Giuseppe Ando Apos, Dan Atar, Pierre Sabouret","doi":"10.1159/ort/aecag009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease and cancer frequently coexist, and cardiovascular toxicity can limit the delivery of effective anticancer therapy and influence long-term outcomes. Conventional cardiovascular risk scores were not designed for oncology populations and do not fully capture treatment-related risk. This narrative review examines how clinical assessment, circulating biomarkers, and multimodality imaging can be combined to refine cardiovascular risk stratification before, during, and after cancer treatment. High-sensitivity cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides provide complementary information on myocardial injury and hemodynamic stress, whereas echocardiography with global longitudinal strain enables detection of subclinical dysfunction before a fall in left ventricular ejection fraction. Cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and selected nuclear imaging techniques provide additional tissue, coronary, vascular, and inflammatory characterization when clinically indicated. Recent validation studies support treatment-specific risk assessment, but important limitations remain, including variable biomarker thresholds, incomplete external validation of risk models, inter-vendor variability in strain measurements, and limited randomized evidence that surveillance strategies improve hard clinical outcomes. A practical precision cardio-oncology approach should therefore integrate baseline risk, treatment exposure, serial biomarker trends, and appropriately selected imaging rather than rely on a single test.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/ort/aecag009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease and cancer frequently coexist, and cardiovascular toxicity can limit the delivery of effective anticancer therapy and influence long-term outcomes. Conventional cardiovascular risk scores were not designed for oncology populations and do not fully capture treatment-related risk. This narrative review examines how clinical assessment, circulating biomarkers, and multimodality imaging can be combined to refine cardiovascular risk stratification before, during, and after cancer treatment. High-sensitivity cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides provide complementary information on myocardial injury and hemodynamic stress, whereas echocardiography with global longitudinal strain enables detection of subclinical dysfunction before a fall in left ventricular ejection fraction. Cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and selected nuclear imaging techniques provide additional tissue, coronary, vascular, and inflammatory characterization when clinically indicated. Recent validation studies support treatment-specific risk assessment, but important limitations remain, including variable biomarker thresholds, incomplete external validation of risk models, inter-vendor variability in strain measurements, and limited randomized evidence that surveillance strategies improve hard clinical outcomes. A practical precision cardio-oncology approach should therefore integrate baseline risk, treatment exposure, serial biomarker trends, and appropriately selected imaging rather than rely on a single test.
期刊介绍:
With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.