Preclinical Target Animal Safety Evaluation of Veterinary Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles, Methods, and Interpretation.

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Adam Werts, Matthew Kuhn, Lauren Bessey, Alicia Braxton Hickman, Emily Chory, John Mitchell, Kirby Pasloske
{"title":"Preclinical Target Animal Safety Evaluation of Veterinary Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles, Methods, and Interpretation.","authors":"Adam Werts, Matthew Kuhn, Lauren Bessey, Alicia Braxton Hickman, Emily Chory, John Mitchell, Kirby Pasloske","doi":"10.1111/jvp.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a rapidly expanding pharmaceutical class in veterinary medicine, with several products now authorized for use in dogs and cats. Limited published articles and veterinarian exposure to the principles of drug development present challenges in interpreting published safety evaluations that inform product labeling and clinical use. This review describes the principles, methods, strengths, limitations, and interpretation of preclinical target animal safety (TAS) studies for veterinary mAbs and is intended to equip veterinarians and researchers with the knowledge to critically evaluate published TAS data and understand how preclinical safety evidence translates to product labeling. TAS studies are conducted in healthy, purpose-bred animals of the target species using a margin of safety (MOS) approach with supratherapeutic dosing to screen for product risks. The regulatory and scientific framework is based on internationally harmonized guidance for safety evaluation of small molecule therapeutics in veterinary medicine and more than four decades of experience with mAb therapeutics in human medicine. The high target specificity of the mAb drug class enables a hypothesis-driven evaluation strategy, combining standard endpoints with target-informed specialized assessments. Terminal gross and histopathological endpoints provide safety data that clinical studies cannot generate, identifying potential adverse effects down to the cellular level. Unique to veterinary medicine, these data are generated directly in the target species. Data interpretation follows a weight-of-evidence approach in which findings are presumed treatment-related until demonstrated otherwise, integrating dose-response relationships, biological plausibility, and both study and historical control data. TAS studies complement the broader safety evaluation continuum, including clinical field studies, pharmacovigilance, and independent research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.70116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a rapidly expanding pharmaceutical class in veterinary medicine, with several products now authorized for use in dogs and cats. Limited published articles and veterinarian exposure to the principles of drug development present challenges in interpreting published safety evaluations that inform product labeling and clinical use. This review describes the principles, methods, strengths, limitations, and interpretation of preclinical target animal safety (TAS) studies for veterinary mAbs and is intended to equip veterinarians and researchers with the knowledge to critically evaluate published TAS data and understand how preclinical safety evidence translates to product labeling. TAS studies are conducted in healthy, purpose-bred animals of the target species using a margin of safety (MOS) approach with supratherapeutic dosing to screen for product risks. The regulatory and scientific framework is based on internationally harmonized guidance for safety evaluation of small molecule therapeutics in veterinary medicine and more than four decades of experience with mAb therapeutics in human medicine. The high target specificity of the mAb drug class enables a hypothesis-driven evaluation strategy, combining standard endpoints with target-informed specialized assessments. Terminal gross and histopathological endpoints provide safety data that clinical studies cannot generate, identifying potential adverse effects down to the cellular level. Unique to veterinary medicine, these data are generated directly in the target species. Data interpretation follows a weight-of-evidence approach in which findings are presumed treatment-related until demonstrated otherwise, integrating dose-response relationships, biological plausibility, and both study and historical control data. TAS studies complement the broader safety evaluation continuum, including clinical field studies, pharmacovigilance, and independent research.

兽医单克隆抗体临床前靶动物安全性评价:原则、方法和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JVPT) is an international journal devoted to the publication of scientific papers in the basic and clinical aspects of veterinary pharmacology and toxicology, whether the study is in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo or in silico. The Journal is a forum for recent scientific information and developments in the discipline of veterinary pharmacology, including toxicology and therapeutics. Studies that are entirely in vitro will not be considered within the scope of JVPT unless the study has direct relevance to the use of the drug (including toxicants and feed additives) in veterinary species, or that it can be clearly demonstrated that a similar outcome would be expected in vivo. These studies should consider approved or widely used veterinary drugs and/or drugs with broad applicability to veterinary species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书