Understanding consciousness (biological and artificial) as a society of self-schemas.

IF 9.5 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Michael S A Graziano
{"title":"Understanding consciousness (biological and artificial) as a society of self-schemas.","authors":"Michael S A Graziano","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2628598123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article argues that human cognition is more than the performance of functions such as memory, decision-making, and attention. The brain also builds schematic models of those cognitive functions and uses those models to monitor, predict, and partially control them. When you introspect, your understanding of who you are and what is happening inside of you is derived from those schematic, sometimes inaccurate, but generally useful models, rather than from the actual cognitive functions that are represented by those models. The proposal expands the previously proposed attention schema theory to a more general schema theory, in which the mind as we know it introspectively is a society of interacting self-schemas. The article focuses on five self-schemas including the attention schema (which is proposed to give us our intuitions about a conscious mind that takes possession of items in a vivid manner), a decision schema (which generates simplified, sometimes confabulated accounts of the decision-making process and gives us our intuitive understanding of agency and will), emotion schemas (which create complex interpretations of the physiological state of the body and provide us with our understanding of emotional experience), the body schema (which provides our understanding of who we are as physical beings), and personas (which give us our understanding of our emotional, social, and moral character, and act as a framework to guide our behavior). The article includes a discussion of how consciousness in a machine requires a similar suite of self-schemas used for similar functional purposes and may already be partially present.</p>","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"123 42","pages":"e2628598123"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2628598123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that human cognition is more than the performance of functions such as memory, decision-making, and attention. The brain also builds schematic models of those cognitive functions and uses those models to monitor, predict, and partially control them. When you introspect, your understanding of who you are and what is happening inside of you is derived from those schematic, sometimes inaccurate, but generally useful models, rather than from the actual cognitive functions that are represented by those models. The proposal expands the previously proposed attention schema theory to a more general schema theory, in which the mind as we know it introspectively is a society of interacting self-schemas. The article focuses on five self-schemas including the attention schema (which is proposed to give us our intuitions about a conscious mind that takes possession of items in a vivid manner), a decision schema (which generates simplified, sometimes confabulated accounts of the decision-making process and gives us our intuitive understanding of agency and will), emotion schemas (which create complex interpretations of the physiological state of the body and provide us with our understanding of emotional experience), the body schema (which provides our understanding of who we are as physical beings), and personas (which give us our understanding of our emotional, social, and moral character, and act as a framework to guide our behavior). The article includes a discussion of how consciousness in a machine requires a similar suite of self-schemas used for similar functional purposes and may already be partially present.

将意识(生物的和人工的)理解为一个自我图式的社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书