Multi-class Identification and Quantification of Breast Implant-related Complications in Ultrasonography Using a Pathology-informed Lesion Graph: A Deep Learning Development and Validation Study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hyokyung Yoo, Byeong Soo Kim, Jae Jin Ock, Ki Yong Hong, Hak Chang, Sungwan Kim
{"title":"Multi-class Identification and Quantification of Breast Implant-related Complications in Ultrasonography Using a Pathology-informed Lesion Graph: A Deep Learning Development and Validation Study.","authors":"Hyokyung Yoo, Byeong Soo Kim, Jae Jin Ock, Ki Yong Hong, Hak Chang, Sungwan Kim","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast ultrasonography (US) is cost-effective for detecting breast implant-related complications, but its reliability remains highly operator-dependent.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study developed and validated a deep learning model for the automated multi-class identification and quantitative evaluation of breast implant complications (rupture, capsular contracture, and hematoma).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 14,679 breast US images across 1,022 breast implant sequences from 908 patients. The proposed architecture integrates multiscale visual encoding, automated probe position mapping, and a pathology-informed mask graph layer with a Gradient Reversal Layer for lumen adversarial debiasing. Four convolutional backbones were benchmarked using an independent patient-level test dataset (N=197 implants).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimized DenseNet-based framework achieved 96.97% balanced accuracy with expert-guided spatial priors and 88.67% under autonomous baseline conditions. The model yielded 100% sensitivity for normal, rupture, and hematoma cohorts, and 87.88% sensitivity for capsular contracture; minor false-negatives were traced to morphological heterogeneity and coexisting pathologies. Furthermore, the system extracted quantitative morphometric profiles, yielding a mean relative capsule thickness of 2.4±0.4% for capsular contractures and a mean relative fluid area of 13.9±6.4% for hematomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed multiscale model delivers a comprehensive, clinical-grade output, comprising accurate complication classification, five-zone spatial localization, and objective morphometric metrics, while mitigating operator dependency. This system holds strong potential as an accessible, high-performance decision support tool for long-term safety screening of patients with breast implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast ultrasonography (US) is cost-effective for detecting breast implant-related complications, but its reliability remains highly operator-dependent.

Objectives: This study developed and validated a deep learning model for the automated multi-class identification and quantitative evaluation of breast implant complications (rupture, capsular contracture, and hematoma).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 14,679 breast US images across 1,022 breast implant sequences from 908 patients. The proposed architecture integrates multiscale visual encoding, automated probe position mapping, and a pathology-informed mask graph layer with a Gradient Reversal Layer for lumen adversarial debiasing. Four convolutional backbones were benchmarked using an independent patient-level test dataset (N=197 implants).

Results: The optimized DenseNet-based framework achieved 96.97% balanced accuracy with expert-guided spatial priors and 88.67% under autonomous baseline conditions. The model yielded 100% sensitivity for normal, rupture, and hematoma cohorts, and 87.88% sensitivity for capsular contracture; minor false-negatives were traced to morphological heterogeneity and coexisting pathologies. Furthermore, the system extracted quantitative morphometric profiles, yielding a mean relative capsule thickness of 2.4±0.4% for capsular contractures and a mean relative fluid area of 13.9±6.4% for hematomas.

Conclusions: The proposed multiscale model delivers a comprehensive, clinical-grade output, comprising accurate complication classification, five-zone spatial localization, and objective morphometric metrics, while mitigating operator dependency. This system holds strong potential as an accessible, high-performance decision support tool for long-term safety screening of patients with breast implants.

利用病理病变图对超声检查中乳房植入物相关并发症的多类别识别和量化:一项深度学习开发和验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书