Nutritional intake on dialysis and non-dialysis days and the effect of intradialytic food provision among hemodialysis patients, a single-center study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Haalah Shaaker, Andrew Davenport
{"title":"Nutritional intake on dialysis and non-dialysis days and the effect of intradialytic food provision among hemodialysis patients, a single-center study.","authors":"Haalah Shaaker, Andrew Davenport","doi":"10.1038/s41430-026-01833-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) are at risk of malnutrition due to the considerable time required to attend dialysis, which may reduce food intake on dialysis days (DDs). We assessed dietary intake on one DD and two non-dialysis days (NDDs) and the impact of intradialytic food consumption on nutritional status.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of 60 HD outpatients using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria, dietary records, and bioimpedance analysis to assess nutritional intake and status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Their mean age was 62 ± 14 years; 65% were male, 27% had sarcopenia, 67% were frail, and one-third were classified with malnutrition. Three-day averaged dietary records showed that only 8% met the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative energy and protein recommendations; both were lower on the DD compared with NDDs: 14.8 (10.7-22.3) vs 16.3 (13.3-22.9) kcal/kg/day (p = 0.018) and 0.72 ± 0.35 vs 0.87 ± 0.38 g/kg/day (p = 0.001), respectively. Forty-three percent brought food on the DD, and their energy and protein intakes did not differ between the DD and NDDs. In contrast, those who did not bring food had lower energy (p < 0.001) and protein intakes (p < 0.001) on the DD. Patients who brought food did not experience any greater peri-dialytic hypotension (n = 10, 38% vs n = 14, 41%), despite lower extracellular water-to-total body water ratios (p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nutritional intake remains suboptimal in many hemodialysis patients, particularly on DDs. These findings suggest that providing or bringing food during dialysis may help improve or maintain nutritional intake. However, longitudinal studies are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11927,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-026-01833-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) are at risk of malnutrition due to the considerable time required to attend dialysis, which may reduce food intake on dialysis days (DDs). We assessed dietary intake on one DD and two non-dialysis days (NDDs) and the impact of intradialytic food consumption on nutritional status.

Subjects/methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 60 HD outpatients using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria, dietary records, and bioimpedance analysis to assess nutritional intake and status.

Results: Their mean age was 62 ± 14 years; 65% were male, 27% had sarcopenia, 67% were frail, and one-third were classified with malnutrition. Three-day averaged dietary records showed that only 8% met the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative energy and protein recommendations; both were lower on the DD compared with NDDs: 14.8 (10.7-22.3) vs 16.3 (13.3-22.9) kcal/kg/day (p = 0.018) and 0.72 ± 0.35 vs 0.87 ± 0.38 g/kg/day (p = 0.001), respectively. Forty-three percent brought food on the DD, and their energy and protein intakes did not differ between the DD and NDDs. In contrast, those who did not bring food had lower energy (p < 0.001) and protein intakes (p < 0.001) on the DD. Patients who brought food did not experience any greater peri-dialytic hypotension (n = 10, 38% vs n = 14, 41%), despite lower extracellular water-to-total body water ratios (p = 0.007).

Conclusion: Nutritional intake remains suboptimal in many hemodialysis patients, particularly on DDs. These findings suggest that providing or bringing food during dialysis may help improve or maintain nutritional intake. However, longitudinal studies are required to confirm these findings.

血液透析患者透析和非透析日的营养摄入及透析内食物供应的影响,单中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (EJCN) is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of human and clinical nutrition. The journal welcomes original research, reviews, case reports and brief communications based on clinical, metabolic and epidemiological studies that describe methodologies, mechanisms, associations and benefits of nutritional interventions for clinical disease and health promotion. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: Nutrition and Health (including climate and ecological aspects) Metabolism & Metabolomics Genomics and personalized strategies in nutrition Nutrition during the early life cycle Health issues and nutrition in the elderly Phenotyping in clinical nutrition Nutrition in acute and chronic diseases The double burden of ''malnutrition'': Under-nutrition and Obesity Prevention of Non Communicable Diseases (NCD)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书