Unravelling GLOF Hazards in the Sikkim Himalaya: Simulating Multi-Lake Flood Scenarios Under Extreme Conditions

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Vikas Singh Jadoun, Deepali Gaikwad, Reet Kamal Tiwari,  Abhishek
{"title":"Unravelling GLOF Hazards in the Sikkim Himalaya: Simulating Multi-Lake Flood Scenarios Under Extreme Conditions","authors":"Vikas Singh Jadoun,&nbsp;Deepali Gaikwad,&nbsp;Reet Kamal Tiwari,&nbsp; Abhishek","doi":"10.1002/esp.70421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In recent decades, the Himalayan region has witnessed accelerated glacier retreat, driven by climate change, leading to the formation and expansion of glacial lakes. These lakes pose significant threats in the form of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), which can be triggered by external events such as rockfalls, ice avalanches, intense precipitation and seismic activity. Previous Himalayan GLOF studies largely focused on single-lake breaches, whereas the cascading or simultaneous failure of multiple glacial lakes under regionally correlated triggers remains insufficiently explored. Given that many high-hazard lakes are located within similar hydro-climatic and seismic zones, understanding worst-case GLOF scenarios involving simultaneous breaches from multiple lakes requires detailed investigation. This study addresses this critical gap by rigorously quantifying the impacts of multi-lake GLOF events, considered among the most severe hazards threatening downstream communities. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling in HEC-RAS, we simulate the hydraulic behaviour of GLOFs originating from three highly vulnerable lakes: South Lhonak Lake, Gurudongmar Lake and Shako Cho Lake. The analysis encompasses seven distinct scenarios (S1–S7), ranging from individual lake outbursts to simultaneous breaches of all three lakes. Our findings reveal maximum flow depths ranging from 5 to 20 m, with flow velocities between 1 and 4 m/s. The worst-case scenario produced a peak discharge of approximately 9400 m<sup>3</sup>/s at Chungthang, a critical downstream settlement. These findings highlight the potentially catastrophic consequences of multi-lake GLOF events, emphasizing the urgent need for integrated hazard assessment and proactive mitigation planning in vulnerable Himalayan river basins.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"51 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, the Himalayan region has witnessed accelerated glacier retreat, driven by climate change, leading to the formation and expansion of glacial lakes. These lakes pose significant threats in the form of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), which can be triggered by external events such as rockfalls, ice avalanches, intense precipitation and seismic activity. Previous Himalayan GLOF studies largely focused on single-lake breaches, whereas the cascading or simultaneous failure of multiple glacial lakes under regionally correlated triggers remains insufficiently explored. Given that many high-hazard lakes are located within similar hydro-climatic and seismic zones, understanding worst-case GLOF scenarios involving simultaneous breaches from multiple lakes requires detailed investigation. This study addresses this critical gap by rigorously quantifying the impacts of multi-lake GLOF events, considered among the most severe hazards threatening downstream communities. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling in HEC-RAS, we simulate the hydraulic behaviour of GLOFs originating from three highly vulnerable lakes: South Lhonak Lake, Gurudongmar Lake and Shako Cho Lake. The analysis encompasses seven distinct scenarios (S1–S7), ranging from individual lake outbursts to simultaneous breaches of all three lakes. Our findings reveal maximum flow depths ranging from 5 to 20 m, with flow velocities between 1 and 4 m/s. The worst-case scenario produced a peak discharge of approximately 9400 m3/s at Chungthang, a critical downstream settlement. These findings highlight the potentially catastrophic consequences of multi-lake GLOF events, emphasizing the urgent need for integrated hazard assessment and proactive mitigation planning in vulnerable Himalayan river basins.

揭示锡金喜马拉雅地区GLOF灾害:模拟极端条件下的多湖洪水情景
近几十年来,在气候变化的推动下,喜马拉雅地区的冰川加速退缩,导致冰川湖的形成和扩张。这些湖泊以冰湖溃决洪水(GLOFs)的形式构成重大威胁,冰湖溃决洪水可由岩崩、冰崩、强降水和地震活动等外部事件触发。以前喜马拉雅冰川溃决的研究主要集中在单个湖泊的溃决上,而在区域相关触发下多个冰川湖泊的级联或同时溃决的研究仍然不够充分。考虑到许多高风险湖泊位于相似的水文气候和地震带,了解涉及多个湖泊同时决口的最坏GLOF情景需要详细的调查。本研究通过严格量化多湖GLOF事件的影响来解决这一关键差距,GLOF事件被认为是威胁下游社区最严重的危害之一。利用HEC-RAS中的二维水动力学模型,我们模拟了来自三个高度脆弱湖泊的GLOFs的水力行为:南Lhonak湖,Gurudongmar湖和Shako Cho湖。分析包括七个不同的情景(S1-S7),从单个湖泊爆发到三个湖泊同时破裂。我们的研究结果表明,最大流动深度为5至20米,流速为1至4米/秒。在最坏的情况下,忠塘的峰值流量约为9400立方米/秒,这是一个关键的下游定居点。这些发现强调了多湖GLOF事件的潜在灾难性后果,强调了在脆弱的喜马拉雅河流流域进行综合危害评估和主动减灾规划的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书