Riparian Amphibian and Reptile Assemblages in Streams Along a Forest Regeneration Gradient in the Ecuadorian Chocó

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Biotropica Pub Date : 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1111/btp.70250
Moira L. M. Wiedebusch, Omar Torres-Carvajal, Mark-Oliver Rödel
{"title":"Riparian Amphibian and Reptile Assemblages in Streams Along a Forest Regeneration Gradient in the Ecuadorian Chocó","authors":"Moira L. M. Wiedebusch,&nbsp;Omar Torres-Carvajal,&nbsp;Mark-Oliver Rödel","doi":"10.1111/btp.70250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While primary forests are declining, regenerating habitats are becoming increasingly common. In fragmented environments, streams may function as corridors between forest remnants for riparian and aquatic species. However, the responses of stream-associated species to forest regeneration remain understudied. In this study, we compared the abundance, diversity, and species composition of stream-obligate amphibians and reptiles along 17 stream sites, surrounded by habitats at different forest regeneration stages. These sites included actively used cacao plantations and pasture, forest regenerating from former cacao and pasture land, and old-growth forest. We collected environmental data and conducted time-standardized visual and auditory surveys along stream transects. Diversity indices and multivariate community analyses were used to assess the influence of habitat variables on assemblage composition. Streams in regenerating forests supported higher herpetological richness and diversity than primary forests, whereas actively used sites had the lowest diversity; however, these differences were not significant. Amphibian diversity was higher in pasture regeneration streams than in actively used pastures, whereas reptiles showed no significant differences. Canopy and understory vegetation densities were the strongest predictor for stream amphibian assemblage differences, whereas broader environmental conditions and correlated climate and structural variables shaped stream reptile distributions. Amphibians showed more pronounced species shifts between regeneration states, demonstrating higher sensitivity to disturbance than reptiles. Our findings highlight the importance of riparian vegetation and water availability in both active and regenerating sites for sustaining stream herpetofaunal diversity in tropical landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"58 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70250","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While primary forests are declining, regenerating habitats are becoming increasingly common. In fragmented environments, streams may function as corridors between forest remnants for riparian and aquatic species. However, the responses of stream-associated species to forest regeneration remain understudied. In this study, we compared the abundance, diversity, and species composition of stream-obligate amphibians and reptiles along 17 stream sites, surrounded by habitats at different forest regeneration stages. These sites included actively used cacao plantations and pasture, forest regenerating from former cacao and pasture land, and old-growth forest. We collected environmental data and conducted time-standardized visual and auditory surveys along stream transects. Diversity indices and multivariate community analyses were used to assess the influence of habitat variables on assemblage composition. Streams in regenerating forests supported higher herpetological richness and diversity than primary forests, whereas actively used sites had the lowest diversity; however, these differences were not significant. Amphibian diversity was higher in pasture regeneration streams than in actively used pastures, whereas reptiles showed no significant differences. Canopy and understory vegetation densities were the strongest predictor for stream amphibian assemblage differences, whereas broader environmental conditions and correlated climate and structural variables shaped stream reptile distributions. Amphibians showed more pronounced species shifts between regeneration states, demonstrating higher sensitivity to disturbance than reptiles. Our findings highlight the importance of riparian vegetation and water availability in both active and regenerating sites for sustaining stream herpetofaunal diversity in tropical landscapes.

厄瓜多尔沿森林更新梯度的溪流中河岸两栖类和爬行类的组合Chocó
虽然原始森林正在减少,但再生栖息地正变得越来越普遍。在破碎的环境中,溪流可以作为森林遗迹之间的走廊,为河岸和水生物种提供栖息地。然而,河流相关物种对森林更新的响应仍未得到充分研究。在本研究中,我们比较了17个河流站点在不同的森林更新阶段的河流专性两栖动物和爬行动物的丰度、多样性和物种组成。这些地点包括积极使用的可可种植园和牧场,从以前的可可和牧场再生的森林,以及原始森林。我们收集了环境数据,并沿着河流样带进行了时间标准化的视觉和听觉调查。利用多样性指数和多变量群落分析来评价生境变量对群落组成的影响。更新林中的溪流支持的爬行动物丰富度和多样性高于原始林,而活跃利用地的多样性最低;然而,这些差异并不显著。草地更新流中两栖动物多样性高于主动利用流,爬行动物多样性差异不显著。冠层和林下植被密度是河流两栖类组合差异的最强预测因子,而更广泛的环境条件和相关的气候和结构变量影响了河流爬行类的分布。两栖动物在再生状态之间的物种转换更为明显,对干扰的敏感性高于爬行动物。我们的研究结果强调了在热带景观中,在活跃和再生地点,河岸植被和水的可用性对于维持溪流疱疹动物多样性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书