Reliable Few-Shot Fault Diagnosis for Grid-Connected PV Systems: When Real-Only Training Outperforms Generative Synthesis

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
ByungKi Jeon, Sang-Woo Ha, Dongyun Lee, Jung-Soo Mun, HongJin Joo
{"title":"Reliable Few-Shot Fault Diagnosis for Grid-Connected PV Systems: When Real-Only Training Outperforms Generative Synthesis","authors":"ByungKi Jeon,&nbsp;Sang-Woo Ha,&nbsp;Dongyun Lee,&nbsp;Jung-Soo Mun,&nbsp;HongJin Joo","doi":"10.1155/er/7339771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We identify a reliable, low-compute few-shot diagnostic pipeline for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems and quantify how far six modern generative synthesis methods fall short of it when their output is used as the classifier’s only training data. Training a 200-tree Random Forest directly on as few as five real waveform windows per fault class—what we call <i>k</i>-shot real-only training (<i>k</i>-shot TRTR)—achieves macro-F1 = 0.38 at <i>k</i> = 5 and 0.74 at <i>k</i> = 50 on the public GPVS-Faults benchmark, runs in seconds, and the entire audit executes in a few hours on a single consumer GPU. We benchmark this baseline against six generative methods—four conditional GAN baselines (cGAN, WGAN-GP, AC-GAN, FaultGAN) and two diffusion-prior hybrids (DP-cGAN, DP-AC-GAN)—plus a few-shot diffusion-only DDPM reference, across 376 trained pipelines (282 generative and 94 real-only reference runs across two datasets), three downstream classifiers (Random Forest, 1D-CNN, bidirectional LSTM), eight evaluation metrics, four few-shot regimes <i>k</i> ∈ {5, 10, 20, 50}, and five random seeds for the main matrix, 10 for the real-only baselines and three for selected diagnostic experiments, with 95% confidence intervals, under a train-on-synthetic, test-on-real (TSTR) protocol. None of the generative pipelines exceeds the real-only baseline at any <i>k</i> on Random Forest, and the same ordering replicates on a second, independently collected outdoor field dataset under episode-level splitting; a cross-operating-mode stress test within GPVS-Faults further shows that at few-shot scale every pipeline, real-only and generative alike, additionally depends on condition-consistent sampling. We attribute the generative failure to PV waveform complexity—50 Hz grid harmonics, submillisecond inverter switching transients, and slow insolation drift coexisting on a 13-channel × 512-sample window—which the generators answer with severe mode collapse (intraclass diversity at 1%–7% of real for the BCE-family models) and with fabricated high-frequency content (three to four orders of magnitude above ground truth in the inverter-side current band, inflating total harmonic distortion by more than an order of magnitude). A low-pass intervention shows that removing the fabricated high-frequency band alone does not restore TSTR performance; together with the diversity analyses, this is consistent with mode collapse being a major remaining limitation. Per-class analysis identifies one seed-robust, physically interpretable specialized win that may inform future hybrid designs. We recommend <i>k</i>-shot TRTR as a strong, low-compute default for sample-scarce PV diagnostic settings and as a routine sanity baseline in future few-shot fault-synthesis studies. Every result reported here is obtained under the synthetic-only TSTR protocol; real-plus-synthetic augmentation, in which the <i>k</i> real windows are retained alongside the synthetic ones, is a distinct question lying outside the scope of this audit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/7339771","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/7339771","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We identify a reliable, low-compute few-shot diagnostic pipeline for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems and quantify how far six modern generative synthesis methods fall short of it when their output is used as the classifier’s only training data. Training a 200-tree Random Forest directly on as few as five real waveform windows per fault class—what we call k-shot real-only training (k-shot TRTR)—achieves macro-F1 = 0.38 at k = 5 and 0.74 at k = 50 on the public GPVS-Faults benchmark, runs in seconds, and the entire audit executes in a few hours on a single consumer GPU. We benchmark this baseline against six generative methods—four conditional GAN baselines (cGAN, WGAN-GP, AC-GAN, FaultGAN) and two diffusion-prior hybrids (DP-cGAN, DP-AC-GAN)—plus a few-shot diffusion-only DDPM reference, across 376 trained pipelines (282 generative and 94 real-only reference runs across two datasets), three downstream classifiers (Random Forest, 1D-CNN, bidirectional LSTM), eight evaluation metrics, four few-shot regimes k ∈ {5, 10, 20, 50}, and five random seeds for the main matrix, 10 for the real-only baselines and three for selected diagnostic experiments, with 95% confidence intervals, under a train-on-synthetic, test-on-real (TSTR) protocol. None of the generative pipelines exceeds the real-only baseline at any k on Random Forest, and the same ordering replicates on a second, independently collected outdoor field dataset under episode-level splitting; a cross-operating-mode stress test within GPVS-Faults further shows that at few-shot scale every pipeline, real-only and generative alike, additionally depends on condition-consistent sampling. We attribute the generative failure to PV waveform complexity—50 Hz grid harmonics, submillisecond inverter switching transients, and slow insolation drift coexisting on a 13-channel × 512-sample window—which the generators answer with severe mode collapse (intraclass diversity at 1%–7% of real for the BCE-family models) and with fabricated high-frequency content (three to four orders of magnitude above ground truth in the inverter-side current band, inflating total harmonic distortion by more than an order of magnitude). A low-pass intervention shows that removing the fabricated high-frequency band alone does not restore TSTR performance; together with the diversity analyses, this is consistent with mode collapse being a major remaining limitation. Per-class analysis identifies one seed-robust, physically interpretable specialized win that may inform future hybrid designs. We recommend k-shot TRTR as a strong, low-compute default for sample-scarce PV diagnostic settings and as a routine sanity baseline in future few-shot fault-synthesis studies. Every result reported here is obtained under the synthetic-only TSTR protocol; real-plus-synthetic augmentation, in which the k real windows are retained alongside the synthetic ones, is a distinct question lying outside the scope of this audit.

Abstract Image

并网光伏系统可靠的少弹故障诊断:纯实数训练优于生成综合
我们为并网光伏(PV)系统确定了一个可靠的、低计算的、少射击的诊断管道,并量化了当六种现代生成合成方法的输出用作分类器唯一的训练数据时,它们的不足之处。直接在每个故障类的5个真实波形窗口上训练200棵树的随机森林——我们称之为k-shot real-only Training (k-shot TRTR)——在公共GPVS-Faults基准测试中,在k = 5时实现宏观f1 = 0.38,在k = 50时实现0.74,在几秒钟内运行,整个审计在单个消费GPU上几个小时内执行。我们针对六种生成方法对该基线进行基准测试——四个条件GAN基线(cGAN, WGAN-GP, AC-GAN, FaultGAN)和两个扩散先验混合(DP-cGAN, DP-AC-GAN),外加一个少量扩散的DDPM参考,跨越376个训练管道(282个生成和94个真实参考跨越两个数据集),三个下游分类器(随机森林,d - cnn,双向LSTM),八个评估指标,四个少量状态k∈{5,10,20,50},5个随机种子用于主矩阵,10个用于真实基线,3个用于选定的诊断实验,在训练-合成,测试-真实(TSTR)协议下具有95%的置信区间。在随机森林的任何k点上,生成管道都没有超过真实基线,并且在情节级分裂下,相同的顺序复制到第二个独立收集的室外现场数据集上;GPVS-Faults的交叉作业模式应力测试进一步表明,在少量射击尺度下,每个管道,无论是真实的还是生成的,都依赖于条件一致的采样。我们将生成故障归因于PV波形复杂性- 50 Hz电网谐波,亚毫秒逆变器开关瞬态,以及在13通道× 512采样窗口上共存的缓慢日照漂移-发生器以严重的模式崩溃(bce系列模型的类内分集为1%-7%)和伪造的高频内容(在逆变器侧电流频带中高于地面真值三到四个数量级)来应对。使总谐波失真膨胀超过一个数量级)。低通干预表明,单独去除制备的高频波段并不能恢复TSTR性能;结合多样性分析,这与模态崩溃是一个主要的剩余限制是一致的。每个类的分析确定了一个种子-健壮的,物理上可解释的专门的胜利,可以为未来的混合设计提供信息。我们推荐k-shot TRTR作为样本稀缺PV诊断设置的强大、低计算的默认值,并作为未来少量故障综合研究的常规健康基线。这里报告的每个结果都是在纯合成TSTR协议下获得的;real-plus-synthetic augmentation,即k个真实窗口与合成窗口同时保留,是本审计范围之外的一个明显问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书