ByungKi Jeon, Sang-Woo Ha, Dongyun Lee, Jung-Soo Mun, HongJin Joo
{"title":"Reliable Few-Shot Fault Diagnosis for Grid-Connected PV Systems: When Real-Only Training Outperforms Generative Synthesis","authors":"ByungKi Jeon, Sang-Woo Ha, Dongyun Lee, Jung-Soo Mun, HongJin Joo","doi":"10.1155/er/7339771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We identify a reliable, low-compute few-shot diagnostic pipeline for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems and quantify how far six modern generative synthesis methods fall short of it when their output is used as the classifier’s only training data. Training a 200-tree Random Forest directly on as few as five real waveform windows per fault class—what we call <i>k</i>-shot real-only training (<i>k</i>-shot TRTR)—achieves macro-F1 = 0.38 at <i>k</i> = 5 and 0.74 at <i>k</i> = 50 on the public GPVS-Faults benchmark, runs in seconds, and the entire audit executes in a few hours on a single consumer GPU. We benchmark this baseline against six generative methods—four conditional GAN baselines (cGAN, WGAN-GP, AC-GAN, FaultGAN) and two diffusion-prior hybrids (DP-cGAN, DP-AC-GAN)—plus a few-shot diffusion-only DDPM reference, across 376 trained pipelines (282 generative and 94 real-only reference runs across two datasets), three downstream classifiers (Random Forest, 1D-CNN, bidirectional LSTM), eight evaluation metrics, four few-shot regimes <i>k</i> ∈ {5, 10, 20, 50}, and five random seeds for the main matrix, 10 for the real-only baselines and three for selected diagnostic experiments, with 95% confidence intervals, under a train-on-synthetic, test-on-real (TSTR) protocol. None of the generative pipelines exceeds the real-only baseline at any <i>k</i> on Random Forest, and the same ordering replicates on a second, independently collected outdoor field dataset under episode-level splitting; a cross-operating-mode stress test within GPVS-Faults further shows that at few-shot scale every pipeline, real-only and generative alike, additionally depends on condition-consistent sampling. We attribute the generative failure to PV waveform complexity—50 Hz grid harmonics, submillisecond inverter switching transients, and slow insolation drift coexisting on a 13-channel × 512-sample window—which the generators answer with severe mode collapse (intraclass diversity at 1%–7% of real for the BCE-family models) and with fabricated high-frequency content (three to four orders of magnitude above ground truth in the inverter-side current band, inflating total harmonic distortion by more than an order of magnitude). A low-pass intervention shows that removing the fabricated high-frequency band alone does not restore TSTR performance; together with the diversity analyses, this is consistent with mode collapse being a major remaining limitation. Per-class analysis identifies one seed-robust, physically interpretable specialized win that may inform future hybrid designs. We recommend <i>k</i>-shot TRTR as a strong, low-compute default for sample-scarce PV diagnostic settings and as a routine sanity baseline in future few-shot fault-synthesis studies. Every result reported here is obtained under the synthetic-only TSTR protocol; real-plus-synthetic augmentation, in which the <i>k</i> real windows are retained alongside the synthetic ones, is a distinct question lying outside the scope of this audit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/7339771","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/7339771","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We identify a reliable, low-compute few-shot diagnostic pipeline for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems and quantify how far six modern generative synthesis methods fall short of it when their output is used as the classifier’s only training data. Training a 200-tree Random Forest directly on as few as five real waveform windows per fault class—what we call k-shot real-only training (k-shot TRTR)—achieves macro-F1 = 0.38 at k = 5 and 0.74 at k = 50 on the public GPVS-Faults benchmark, runs in seconds, and the entire audit executes in a few hours on a single consumer GPU. We benchmark this baseline against six generative methods—four conditional GAN baselines (cGAN, WGAN-GP, AC-GAN, FaultGAN) and two diffusion-prior hybrids (DP-cGAN, DP-AC-GAN)—plus a few-shot diffusion-only DDPM reference, across 376 trained pipelines (282 generative and 94 real-only reference runs across two datasets), three downstream classifiers (Random Forest, 1D-CNN, bidirectional LSTM), eight evaluation metrics, four few-shot regimes k ∈ {5, 10, 20, 50}, and five random seeds for the main matrix, 10 for the real-only baselines and three for selected diagnostic experiments, with 95% confidence intervals, under a train-on-synthetic, test-on-real (TSTR) protocol. None of the generative pipelines exceeds the real-only baseline at any k on Random Forest, and the same ordering replicates on a second, independently collected outdoor field dataset under episode-level splitting; a cross-operating-mode stress test within GPVS-Faults further shows that at few-shot scale every pipeline, real-only and generative alike, additionally depends on condition-consistent sampling. We attribute the generative failure to PV waveform complexity—50 Hz grid harmonics, submillisecond inverter switching transients, and slow insolation drift coexisting on a 13-channel × 512-sample window—which the generators answer with severe mode collapse (intraclass diversity at 1%–7% of real for the BCE-family models) and with fabricated high-frequency content (three to four orders of magnitude above ground truth in the inverter-side current band, inflating total harmonic distortion by more than an order of magnitude). A low-pass intervention shows that removing the fabricated high-frequency band alone does not restore TSTR performance; together with the diversity analyses, this is consistent with mode collapse being a major remaining limitation. Per-class analysis identifies one seed-robust, physically interpretable specialized win that may inform future hybrid designs. We recommend k-shot TRTR as a strong, low-compute default for sample-scarce PV diagnostic settings and as a routine sanity baseline in future few-shot fault-synthesis studies. Every result reported here is obtained under the synthetic-only TSTR protocol; real-plus-synthetic augmentation, in which the k real windows are retained alongside the synthetic ones, is a distinct question lying outside the scope of this audit.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability.
IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents:
-Biofuels and alternatives
-Carbon capturing and storage technologies
-Clean coal technologies
-Energy conversion, conservation and management
-Energy storage
-Energy systems
-Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation
-Hydrogen energy and fuel cells
-Hydrogen production technologies
-Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies
-Nuclear energy
-Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass)
-Smart energy system