Optimizing Straw Return Practices to Improve Soil Properties and Crop Yield in Saline-Alkali Soils: A Global Meta-Analysis Coupled With Machine Learning

IF 4.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Shihan Lv, Xiaofang Wang, Yingshan Chen, Yan Sha, Mo Li, Aizheng Yang
{"title":"Optimizing Straw Return Practices to Improve Soil Properties and Crop Yield in Saline-Alkali Soils: A Global Meta-Analysis Coupled With Machine Learning","authors":"Shihan Lv,&nbsp;Xiaofang Wang,&nbsp;Yingshan Chen,&nbsp;Yan Sha,&nbsp;Mo Li,&nbsp;Aizheng Yang","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil salinization threatens global food production and sustainable arable land use. Although straw return is widely considered a resource-friendly technique for alleviating saline-alkali soils, its overall efficiency, dominant controlling factors, and optimal management levels remain unclear at the global scale. A global meta-analysis of 153 studies, 1092 paired observations, combined with machine learning methods, was conducted to quantify the effect of straw return on crop yield and major soil salinity indicators, to identify dominant controlling factors of the variability, and to optimize straw return management practices in saline-alkali soils. The results showed that straw return increased crop yield by 16.2% and reduced soil exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe) by 16.5% and 21.3%, respectively. Response magnitudes varied with climate, soil properties, and agricultural management. Random forest analysis further indicated that agricultural management practices were the most important factors to control changes in the crop yield, ESP, and ECe. Recommended straw return practices varied with return method and straw size: under mulching, approximately 5000–6000 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for straw size ≤ 5 cm and 9000–10,000 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for straw size &gt; 5 cm; under incorporation, approximately 4000–5000 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for straw size ≤ 5 cm and 5000–6000 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for straw size &gt; 5 cm. Overall, these results demonstrate that scientifically managed straw return can simultaneously enhance crop productivity and alleviate soil salinization, providing a scientific basis and practical guidelines for improving soil health and food security in saline-alkali agroecosystems under a changing environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"18 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70184","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil salinization threatens global food production and sustainable arable land use. Although straw return is widely considered a resource-friendly technique for alleviating saline-alkali soils, its overall efficiency, dominant controlling factors, and optimal management levels remain unclear at the global scale. A global meta-analysis of 153 studies, 1092 paired observations, combined with machine learning methods, was conducted to quantify the effect of straw return on crop yield and major soil salinity indicators, to identify dominant controlling factors of the variability, and to optimize straw return management practices in saline-alkali soils. The results showed that straw return increased crop yield by 16.2% and reduced soil exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe) by 16.5% and 21.3%, respectively. Response magnitudes varied with climate, soil properties, and agricultural management. Random forest analysis further indicated that agricultural management practices were the most important factors to control changes in the crop yield, ESP, and ECe. Recommended straw return practices varied with return method and straw size: under mulching, approximately 5000–6000 kg·ha−1 for straw size ≤ 5 cm and 9000–10,000 kg·ha−1 for straw size > 5 cm; under incorporation, approximately 4000–5000 kg·ha−1 for straw size ≤ 5 cm and 5000–6000 kg·ha−1 for straw size > 5 cm. Overall, these results demonstrate that scientifically managed straw return can simultaneously enhance crop productivity and alleviate soil salinization, providing a scientific basis and practical guidelines for improving soil health and food security in saline-alkali agroecosystems under a changing environment.

优化秸秆还田措施以改善盐碱地土壤性质和作物产量:一项结合机器学习的全球荟萃分析
土壤盐碱化威胁着全球粮食生产和可持续耕地利用。虽然秸秆还田被广泛认为是缓解盐碱地的资源友好型技术,但其总体效率、主要控制因素和最佳管理水平在全球范围内仍不清楚。通过对153项研究、1092项配对观测数据的荟萃分析,结合机器学习方法,量化秸秆还田对作物产量和主要土壤盐分指标的影响,找出变异的主导控制因素,并优化盐碱地秸秆还田管理实践。结果表明,秸秆还田可使作物产量提高16.2%,土壤交换性钠含量(ESP)和饱和土壤浸出物电导率(ECe)分别降低16.5%和21.3%。响应幅度因气候、土壤性质和农业管理而异。随机森林分析进一步表明,农业管理措施是控制作物产量、ESP和ECe变化的最重要因素。推荐的秸秆还田措施因还田方式和秸秆尺寸而异:覆盖下,秸秆尺寸≤5 cm约为5000-6000 kg·ha - 1,秸秆尺寸>; 5 cm约为9000-10,000 kg·ha - 1;在掺入条件下,≤5厘米的秸秆约为4000-5000 kg·ha - 1,≤5厘米的秸秆约为5000-6000 kg·ha - 1。综上所述,科学管理秸秆还田可以在提高作物生产力的同时缓解土壤盐碱化,为环境变化下改善盐碱农业生态系统土壤健康和粮食安全提供科学依据和实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书