Optimizing Straw Return Practices to Improve Soil Properties and Crop Yield in Saline-Alkali Soils: A Global Meta-Analysis Coupled With Machine Learning
Shihan Lv, Xiaofang Wang, Yingshan Chen, Yan Sha, Mo Li, Aizheng Yang
{"title":"Optimizing Straw Return Practices to Improve Soil Properties and Crop Yield in Saline-Alkali Soils: A Global Meta-Analysis Coupled With Machine Learning","authors":"Shihan Lv, Xiaofang Wang, Yingshan Chen, Yan Sha, Mo Li, Aizheng Yang","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil salinization threatens global food production and sustainable arable land use. Although straw return is widely considered a resource-friendly technique for alleviating saline-alkali soils, its overall efficiency, dominant controlling factors, and optimal management levels remain unclear at the global scale. A global meta-analysis of 153 studies, 1092 paired observations, combined with machine learning methods, was conducted to quantify the effect of straw return on crop yield and major soil salinity indicators, to identify dominant controlling factors of the variability, and to optimize straw return management practices in saline-alkali soils. The results showed that straw return increased crop yield by 16.2% and reduced soil exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe) by 16.5% and 21.3%, respectively. Response magnitudes varied with climate, soil properties, and agricultural management. Random forest analysis further indicated that agricultural management practices were the most important factors to control changes in the crop yield, ESP, and ECe. Recommended straw return practices varied with return method and straw size: under mulching, approximately 5000–6000 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for straw size ≤ 5 cm and 9000–10,000 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for straw size > 5 cm; under incorporation, approximately 4000–5000 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for straw size ≤ 5 cm and 5000–6000 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for straw size > 5 cm. Overall, these results demonstrate that scientifically managed straw return can simultaneously enhance crop productivity and alleviate soil salinization, providing a scientific basis and practical guidelines for improving soil health and food security in saline-alkali agroecosystems under a changing environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"18 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70184","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil salinization threatens global food production and sustainable arable land use. Although straw return is widely considered a resource-friendly technique for alleviating saline-alkali soils, its overall efficiency, dominant controlling factors, and optimal management levels remain unclear at the global scale. A global meta-analysis of 153 studies, 1092 paired observations, combined with machine learning methods, was conducted to quantify the effect of straw return on crop yield and major soil salinity indicators, to identify dominant controlling factors of the variability, and to optimize straw return management practices in saline-alkali soils. The results showed that straw return increased crop yield by 16.2% and reduced soil exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe) by 16.5% and 21.3%, respectively. Response magnitudes varied with climate, soil properties, and agricultural management. Random forest analysis further indicated that agricultural management practices were the most important factors to control changes in the crop yield, ESP, and ECe. Recommended straw return practices varied with return method and straw size: under mulching, approximately 5000–6000 kg·ha−1 for straw size ≤ 5 cm and 9000–10,000 kg·ha−1 for straw size > 5 cm; under incorporation, approximately 4000–5000 kg·ha−1 for straw size ≤ 5 cm and 5000–6000 kg·ha−1 for straw size > 5 cm. Overall, these results demonstrate that scientifically managed straw return can simultaneously enhance crop productivity and alleviate soil salinization, providing a scientific basis and practical guidelines for improving soil health and food security in saline-alkali agroecosystems under a changing environment.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.