Development and Validation of a Standard Area Diagram Set of Leaf Rust Severity in Mulberry (Morus nigra L.)

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
José Henrique Pazutti Magri, Larissa Cavalcante Almeida, Caíque Passos Faria, Jonas Alberto Rios
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Standard Area Diagram Set of Leaf Rust Severity in Mulberry (Morus nigra L.)","authors":"José Henrique Pazutti Magri,&nbsp;Larissa Cavalcante Almeida,&nbsp;Caíque Passos Faria,&nbsp;Jonas Alberto Rios","doi":"10.1111/jph.70407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Standard area diagrams sets (SADS) are useful tools to improve accuracy and reliability of the estimates of disease severity in many pathosystems. This study developed and validated a SADS for quantifying the severity of mulberry leaf rust, caused by <i>Cerotelium fici</i>. The proposed scale is composed of eight images representing increasing levels of severity (1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 25%, 35% and 45%). Twenty raters (10 experienced and 10 inexperienced) evaluated the SADS. The raters estimated the same set of 50 images twice, first without the SADS and then with the use of the SADS. The use of the SADS significantly improved the accuracy of the estimates. The bias correction coefficients (<i>C</i><sub><i>b</i></sub>) were 0.75 and 0.98 for inexperienced raters, and 0.99 in both situations for experienced raters, without and with the use of the SADS, respectively. The correlation coefficients (<i>r</i>) increased from 0.85 to 0.96 among inexperienced raters and from 0.94 to 0.96 among experienced raters. Lin's coefficients of concordance (<i>ρ</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>) increased from 0.64 to 0.94 for inexperienced raters and from 0.93 to 0.95 for experienced raters, also comparing the assessments without and with the use of the SADS, respectively. Without the use of the SADS, experienced raters performed statistically better than inexperienced raters in all variables analysed. However, with the use of the SADS, no significant differences were observed between the groups, demonstrating the potential of the tool to reduce the effect of prior experience on the accuracy of estimates. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) showed a significant increase with the use of the diagrammatic scale in both groups of raters. The SADS validated in this study constitutes a robust, accurate, and accessible tool for quantifying the severity of mulberry leaf rust, contributing to the advancement of epidemiological studies, the selection of resistant genotypes and disease management under field conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"174 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jph.70407","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard area diagrams sets (SADS) are useful tools to improve accuracy and reliability of the estimates of disease severity in many pathosystems. This study developed and validated a SADS for quantifying the severity of mulberry leaf rust, caused by Cerotelium fici. The proposed scale is composed of eight images representing increasing levels of severity (1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 25%, 35% and 45%). Twenty raters (10 experienced and 10 inexperienced) evaluated the SADS. The raters estimated the same set of 50 images twice, first without the SADS and then with the use of the SADS. The use of the SADS significantly improved the accuracy of the estimates. The bias correction coefficients (Cb) were 0.75 and 0.98 for inexperienced raters, and 0.99 in both situations for experienced raters, without and with the use of the SADS, respectively. The correlation coefficients (r) increased from 0.85 to 0.96 among inexperienced raters and from 0.94 to 0.96 among experienced raters. Lin's coefficients of concordance (ρc) increased from 0.64 to 0.94 for inexperienced raters and from 0.93 to 0.95 for experienced raters, also comparing the assessments without and with the use of the SADS, respectively. Without the use of the SADS, experienced raters performed statistically better than inexperienced raters in all variables analysed. However, with the use of the SADS, no significant differences were observed between the groups, demonstrating the potential of the tool to reduce the effect of prior experience on the accuracy of estimates. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (R2) showed a significant increase with the use of the diagrammatic scale in both groups of raters. The SADS validated in this study constitutes a robust, accurate, and accessible tool for quantifying the severity of mulberry leaf rust, contributing to the advancement of epidemiological studies, the selection of resistant genotypes and disease management under field conditions.

桑树叶锈病严重程度标准面积图集的建立与验证
标准面积图集(SADS)是提高许多病理系统中疾病严重程度估计的准确性和可靠性的有用工具。本研究开发并验证了一种量化桑叶锈病严重程度的SADS方法,该方法由Cerotelium fici引起。拟议的量表由8个图像组成,代表严重程度的增加(1%,3%,5%,10%,15%,25%,35%和45%)。20名评分员(10名有经验的和10名没有经验的)评估了SADS。评分者对同一组50张图片进行了两次评估,第一次不使用SADS,然后使用SADS。SADS的使用显著提高了估计的准确性。没有经验的评分者的偏倚校正系数(Cb)分别为0.75和0.98,有经验的评分者在不使用和使用SADS的两种情况下的偏倚校正系数分别为0.99。相关系数(r)在没有经验的评价者中由0.85增加到0.96,在有经验的评价者中由0.94增加到0.96。对于没有经验的评分者,林的一致性系数(ρc)从0.64增加到0.94,对于有经验的评分者,林的一致性系数(ρc)从0.93增加到0.95,也分别比较了不使用和使用SADS的评估。在不使用SADS的情况下,在所有分析的变量中,有经验的评分者比没有经验的评分者表现得更好。然而,在使用SADS时,两组之间没有观察到显着差异,这表明该工具有可能减少先前经验对估计准确性的影响。此外,在两组评价者中,使用图表量表的决定系数(R2)均显着增加。本研究验证的SADS是一种可靠、准确和易于使用的工具,可用于量化桑叶锈病的严重程度,有助于推进流行病学研究、抗性基因型的选择和田间条件下的疾病管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书